routes

My URL is: www.foo.com/some-bar-slug-here/page I can't get a route to catch if the string "bar" is found in the slug shown above: Route::any('{myslug}/page/', array('as'=>'bar-page', 'uses'=>'Controllers\MyBar@index')) ->where('myslug','/bar/'); If I use the regex expression [0-9A-Za-z\-]+ it works, but it doesn't work for /bar/ . Any ideas? I got it working with ^([0-9A-Za-z\-]+)?bar([0-9A-Za-z\-]+)? So the updated route code looks like this: Route::any('{myslug}/page/', array('as'=>'bar-page', 'uses'=>'Controllers\MyBar@index')) ->where('myslug','^([0-9A-Za-z\-]+)?bar([0-9A-Za-z\-]+)?');

I have an entity named Agency with following apis GET http://localhost:37331/api/agency?start=1&limit=10&status=1 GET http://localhost:37331/api/agency/2 POST http://localhost:37331/api/agency PUT http://localhost:37331/api/agency DELETE http://localhost:37331/api/agency/4 POST http://localhost:37331/api/agency/activate/3 POST http://localhost:37331/api/agency/deactivate/3 GET http://localhost:37331/api/agency/types The route templates I used are config.Routes.MapHttpRoute( name: "ControllerActionIdApi", routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}", defaults: new { }, constraints: new { id

My route looks like match 'about' => 'company#about' When I set to the url http://localhost:3000/aboutttt , I get the error message No route matches [GET] "/aboutttt" I want to give the user better feedback than that. The best solution by my opinion could be redirect the app back, or on the homepage of the app, but exist in routes any way to set default route, when I get the error above? Run your app with the environment set to production and I think you'll find you'll no longer see this message. It's a convenience for debugging while you're developing. There's a setting in config/environments

I've the following code in my main app. I expect all paths other than the first two to be caught by the last route (/.*). But I get 404 error. What am I missing? import webapp2 from webapp2 import WSGIApplication, Route # ---- main handler class MainPage(webapp2.RequestHandler): def get(self): ret = jinja2render.DoRender(self) return ret routes = [ Route (r'/rpc', handler = 'rpc.RPCHandler'), Route (r'/secured/somesecuredpage', handler = 'secured.securedPageHandler'), Route (r'/.*', handler = MainPage), ] app = WSGIApplication(routes, debug=True) I can change the last route from "/. " to "/<:.

I am new to Rails and normally set up a link_to helper for a normal unnested route like so: link_to "Delete", article_path(article.id), method: :delete, data: {confirm: "Are you sure?"} However I am learning about nested routes and it seems I need to provide the path with two arguments for example: link_to "(Delete)", article_comments_path(comment.article_id, comment.id), method: :delete, data:{comfirm: 'Are you sure?'} However this does not seem to work. I have seen that you can format the link_to like this: link_to 'Destroy Comment', [comment.article, comment], method: :delete, data: {

I have a number of .js files that I would like to be stored in the same directories as their views (they're specific to a view - its simply to keep the javascript separate from the view's HTML) However, adding them to the /Views/ControllerName/ directory wont work because when a request is made to the webserver for the .js file: <script type="text/javascript" src="/Views/ControllerName/myscript.js"></script> It would essentially be directed at the 'Views' controller which obviously doesnt exist. Update From what I have read, adding the following IgnoreRoute in the global.asax.cs RegisterRoutes

This is a newbie question... I am looking at the default asp.net mvc3 project and noticed that there is a controller called: public class AccountController : Controller I looked throughout the code and couldn't find a place that specified AccountController maps to /Account/ for the URL. I discovered that you can change the routing using routes.MapRoute(..) in the Global.asax , but I still don't know where they specified that AccountController maps to /Account/. If it is assumed from the class name, then does that mean all controller classes have to be named xxxxxController? Yes you are right,