role-base-authorization

Why ASP.NET MVC app doesn't recognize user role changes right after modification?

阅读更多关于 Why ASP.NET MVC app doesn't recognize user role changes right after modification?

问题 I have an ASP.NET MVC hybrid app which has an ApiController besides the MVC Controllers. I'm using role based authorization attributes within both the MVC Controllers and the ApiController both at the controller level and sometimes on method level. I'm using Entity Framework 6 with Model based design. The Controller level authorizations: [Authorize(Roles = "Administrator,RegularUser")] public class EngineController : ApiController { or [System.Web.Mvc.Authorize(Roles = "Administrator

Keycloak authorization: Adding a Role to a domain object or an entity

阅读更多关于 Keycloak authorization: Adding a Role to a domain object or an entity

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57014159/keycloak-authorization-adding-a-role-to-a-domain-object-or-an-entity

How to make @PreAuthorize having higher precedence than @Valid or @Validated

阅读更多关于 How to make @PreAuthorize having higher precedence than @Valid or @Validated

问题 I am using spring boot, and I have enabled the global method security in WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter by @EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true, order = Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE) And Below is my controller code @PreAuthorize("hasAnyRole('admin') or principal.id == id") @RequestMapping(value = "/{id}", method = RequestMethod.PUT) public User updateUser(@PathVariable("id") String id, @Valid @RequestBody UserDto userDto) { ....} However, when a non-admin user try to do a PUT request

Permissions design pattern that allows date-based access

阅读更多关于 Permissions design pattern that allows date-based access

问题 I am looking at ways to implement an authorization (not authentication) scheme in my app. There are currently two roles in the system: A and B, but there may be more. User's only have one role. Basically, the I have it set up now is with two database tables. One is for role-based permissions on a model, and the other is for specific user-based permissions. I am thinking that this way, users can have a set of default permissions based on their role-based permissions, but then they can also

Suggestion on JSF authorization

阅读更多关于 Suggestion on JSF authorization

问题 I learnt how to use container authentication with JDBC realm. I searched a lot on internet but I couldn't find anything on JSF authorization except the following article. JSF authorization My goal is to avoid access to protected pages using direct links and to show/hide menu items and form components based on the authenticated user privileges. The last part can be implemented using the rendered attribute of JSF tags but before creating my own dirty and high coupled solution I wonder if there

Multiple before_filter statements for correct_user and admin

阅读更多关于 Multiple before_filter statements for correct_user and admin

问题 I have a Group resource that I'm trying to set up with proper authorizations. The authorization logic I'm trying to implement is this: Only group members should be able to view their group. An admin can view any group, as well as take other actions. I'm attempting to do this with the following before_filter statements in the group controller: before_filter :signed_in_user before_filter :correct_user, only: :show before_filter :admin_user, only: [:show, :index, :edit, :update, :destroy]

Multiple before_filter statements for correct_user and admin

阅读更多关于 Multiple before_filter statements for correct_user and admin

Claims without roles?

阅读更多关于 Claims without roles?

问题 I'm trying to understand ASP.NET Identity authentication and authorization mechanics. I understood what's a claim & what's a role. In almost every related blog post, or question on here it's advised to use claims and avoid roles. I'm confused at this point. How can I use claims without roles? (I normally assign roles to users after they are registered. ) Any help is appreciated. Thank you 回答1: Roles are claims too, claims are just more general. In almost every related blog post, or question

Permissions design pattern that allows date-based access

阅读更多关于 Permissions design pattern that allows date-based access

I am looking at ways to implement an authorization (not authentication) scheme in my app. There are currently two roles in the system: A and B, but there may be more. User's only have one role. Basically, the I have it set up now is with two database tables. One is for role-based permissions on a model, and the other is for specific user-based permissions. I am thinking that this way, users can have a set of default permissions based on their role-based permissions, but then they can also have specific permissions granted/revoked. So for example: table: user_permissions columns: user_id: [int]

Claims without roles?

阅读更多关于 Claims without roles?

I'm trying to understand ASP.NET Identity authentication and authorization mechanics. I understood what's a claim & what's a role. In almost every related blog post, or question on here it's advised to use claims and avoid roles. I'm confused at this point. How can I use claims without roles? (I normally assign roles to users after they are registered. ) Any help is appreciated. Thank you Roles are claims too, claims are just more general. In almost every related blog post, or question on here it's advised to use claims and avoid roles. I can only speculate, as you don't show exact links, that