rebase

问题 We currently have 2 branches: /repo/branch/current_version /repo/branch/next_version current_version is a branch where all developers currently works. We starting a next version and created next_version branch from some point in current_version, while work on current_version is still continuing. In next_version we do some development and in next months the branch will become our main one, where all development will be done. Since there's development on current_branch, we thought periodically

问题 I always use git commit --verbose . Is there an equivalent option/setting that will make git show me the diff when I'm rewording a commit message during git rebase --interactive ? 回答1: According to your answers in the comments, executing git diff HEAD^ will not help you, except you only want to rewored the last commit. But in this case a rebase is the wrong tool anyway. Instead you can simply do git commit --amend --verbose without changes in the index and then edit the commit message, having

问题 I found that when clicking "Submit Patch Set" in the Gerrit web interface, it'll either simply add a commit to that branch, or create a merge commit if another commit was submitted just before. Example that creates 2 commit: The actual commit and a merge commit: User submits patchset A depending on commit O User submits patchset B depending on commit O Submit Patch Set A Submit Patch Set B --> Creates merge commit between O -> A and O -> B There is a "Rebase Change" button which is great but

问题 In my git workflow we have one main repository and one branch, master. Everyone pulls from remote master and everyone pushes to remote master. I want to work in my own branch while I prepare a feature. So far my history is something like this: git pull --rebase git checkout -b new_feature <make some commits> git checkout master git pull --rebase Now I want to merge the branch and here's what I need: No merge commits in my local master branch. All commits made into my new_feature branch merged

问题 I can pull changes using git pull , but it merges my local commits. Is there a git rebase equivalent with which I can pull in remote changes? 回答1: Yes you can git pull --rebase . You can also set that to be the default pull behaviour when you track a branch with git config branch.autosetuprebase always . Replace "always" with "remote" or "local" if you want to do it to those specific types of branches that you're tracking. Now all you have to do is git pull . If for some reason you want to do

问题 We have project (PHP application), but instalation for each client vary, sometimes very little, sometimes more. Still, big part of source code is common. We manage specific installations as parallel branches to master branch and we need to transfer changes from master to other branches. Same situation was solved in Git: how maintain (mostly) parallel branches with only a few difference? The most voted solution was to transfer changes between braches this way: git pull git checkout local git

问题 Has the man page states about git rebase --preserve : Merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to merge commits are not preserved. Is there any good reason for that? 回答1: It would be the same reason for the existence of the command git rerere ( Re use re corded re solution of conflicted merges) See "rerere your boat" and "Fix conflicts only once with git rerere". Git does not record merge conflict resolution for any merge (including the one done again during a rebase -p ) Basically, a

问题 I simply want to speed up my .NET-base client side app and am considering NGEN-ing the code. Jeffery Richter wrote this warning about ngening code: •Inferior Load-Time Performance (Rebasing). When Windows loads an NGend file, it checks to see if the file loads at its preferred base address. If the file cant load at its preferred base address, then Windows relocates the file, fixing-up all of the memory address references. This is extremely time consuming because Windows must load the entire

问题 I simply want to speed up my .NET-base client side app and am considering NGEN-ing the code. Jeffery Richter wrote this warning about ngening code: •Inferior Load-Time Performance (Rebasing). When Windows loads an NGend file, it checks to see if the file loads at its preferred base address. If the file cant load at its preferred base address, then Windows relocates the file, fixing-up all of the memory address references. This is extremely time consuming because Windows must load the entire

问题 I'm in the middle of a rebase of my master to a stage branch git checkout stage git rebase master At some time I deleted two files then modified the two files according to GIT. warning: too many files, skipping inexact rename detection CONFLICT (delete/modify): test-recommendation-result.php deleted in HEAD and modified in [Bug] Fix test recommender. Version [Bug] Fix test recommender of test-recommendation-result.php left in tree. CONFLICT (delete/modify): test-recommendation.php deleted in