rebase

问题 I have a two branches that I keep on top of upstream/master. One branch has the other as an ancestor so they form a line. U1 (upstream/master) \ A -- B (fixes) \ C -- D (features) Later, upstream/master moves forward... U1 -- U2 (upstream/master) \ A -- B (fixes) \ C -- D (features) ... and I want to rebase both branches on top. U1 -- U2 (upstream/master) \ A' -- B' (fixes) \ C' -- D' (features) I know two ways to do it, each with drawbacks. git rebase upstream/master fixes git rebase fixes

问题 There seem to be some similar questions already, but none of them are exactly what I want. Let's say I have commit history like this * xxxxxxxH (HEAD -> B) Latest commit * (more commits) * xxxxxxxG (B) More commits * xxxxxxxF Merge branch 'master' into B |\ | * xxxxxxxE (master) Another commit on master | * (more commits here) | * xxxxxxxD Commit on master * | xxxxxxxC Another commit * | (more commits here) * | xxxxxxxB First commit on branch A |/ * xxxxxxxA (master) some commit Now I want to

问题 Does anyone know what is the difference? Seems to me, it is the same. But when I run it, it didn't do the same thing: git rebase origin/branch - ok rebases from remote branch git rebase origin branch - makes conflicts 回答1: git rebase <upstream> <branch> is equal to git checkout <branch> git rebase <upstream> By default <branch> is HEAD . [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-rebase.html 回答2: @Mar's answer is right and perfectly solved this question, just add one comment. if

问题 (This seems like it should be very easy to do, yet I'm coming up empty on searches so far.) I have a body of code from an upstream source, with various versions tagged in it on various branches. I am working on my "develop" branch which was based on tag "v1.0". many versions have come out since then, but while "v2.0" is interesting, I want to rebase my develop branch to "v1.5" and continue working there (assume I don't plan to feed that back upstream). Maybe later I'll rebase it again to "v2

问题 I'm wondering if there's an upper limit to the number of commits that a git repository can handle. In a solo project I'm working on right now, I've been coding locally, committing/pushing changes in git, then pulling the changes on my development server. I treat this as an easier alternative to working locally and uploading changes via FTP... Fortunately/Unfortunately it's such an easy workflow that I sometimes go through many edit/commit/push/pull/browser-refresh cycles while coding. I'm

问题 Imagine a scenario where a project has an existing git tree you're 100% satisfied with. Now you discover some ancient source code predating migration to git and would like to make it a part of git history. There are many ways how to achieve this but to my knowledge it always ends up with a new git tree, i.e. where all the existing commits have different IDs. In this specific case it doesn't seem to be necessary, I'm not changing anything but the first commit's parent. Is there a way to do

问题 Here's a rather advanced question for true ClearCase experts: I frequently perform a rebase on a ClearCase snapshot view that has just a very limited number of small changes in few files (e.g. file1.c, file2.c, file3.c). I do it with the following on the UNIX command line: cleartool rebase -recommended -complete Sometimes, while this command runs, out of the blue, and for no exlained reasons (yet), I get prompted for manual input to solve some "merge" conflicts. But they make no sense to me,

问题 I have rep1 repository with two commits on master branch. These commits have file.txt with the following content: line1 line2 I clone rep1 into rep2 and checkout remote branch as tracking: git checkout --track rep1/master Then in this repository I modify first line of file.txt to be: line1-modified-rep2 line2 Make commit. Then modify its second line to be line1-modified-rep2 line2-modified-rep2 Make commit. So, here in the rep2 I have added two commits to master branch that tracks remote rep1

问题 because I did something really bad in the past, I have to insert an empty commit at beginning for a rebase. When doing the described steps of the solution (found here Insert a commit before the root commit in Git?) I struggle at the rebase command because of many merge-conflicts. Some are so complicated that it is almost impossible for me to solve them. Most of them have following structure: --A---B---C-- B changes file 'foo.txt' \ / D and E change file 'file.txt' D---E git rebase tries to

问题 I just tried to rebase one of my feature-branches and something went wrong - now i am trying to figure out how to undo this. Being on my feature-branch i simply did a: git rebase develop after committing a bugfix on develop which i wanted in the feature-branch as well. This gave me: $ git rebase develop First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Rename from '.git/HEAD.lock' to '.git/HEAD' failed. Should I try again? (y/n)? n error: Couldn't set HEAD fatal: Cannot update the ref