rebase

问题 we are working on a git repo with several branches. The system only allows to deploy changes onto the live system, if all commits have feature-ids as the beginning of the commit comment that must be approved by the company for this project. We have a typo in one commit that is more than 100 commits back in the past (several people working on this repo), that leads to the feature-id being wrong (and therefore not approved for this project). So now we are not able to push our changes into the

问题 We have 2 teams of developers working on a single system. Team A is working on a 'master' branch (our production branch). They will branch from 'master' to feature or bugfix branches and merge back into 'master' for releasing. Team B is working on an 'upgrade' branch which is branched from 'master'. They follow a similar approach of branching from 'upgrade' to feature or bugfix branches and then merge back into 'upgrade' once their work is done. Eventually the 'upgrade' branch will replace

问题 I want to use git rebase to take a sequence of commits and apply them to a different root commit. For example, git rebase --onto root start finish to get the commits from start to finish based on root . When git cannot apply a commit cleanly, it updates the file to show conflicts like this (example from git manual): Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed. <<<<<<< yours:sample.txt Conflict resolution is hard; let's

问题 I would like to know why the following pattern is not possible. Having created a local feature branch (minor_feature - not intended to be shared with the world) I would like to rebase the work on it on to the tip of a well known branch (stable). However I have discovered that rebase finds nothing to be rebased in the case where stable has not progressed since branching away from it. I appreciate that this breaks the rule that the destination of rebase can not be an ancestor of the source but

问题 It must be very obvious, but I found no way to do it. Every manual describes rebasing onto a top of existing branch or simple interactive rebase and that's all. Suppose, I have a diamond-shaped git history like that: * 949430f Merge commit (D) (HEAD, mybranch) |\ | * e6a2e8b (C) * | 3e653ff (B) |/ * 9c3641f Base commit (A) and i want to archieve history like: * 949430f Combined commit (BCD) | * 9c3641f Base commit (A) Commits B and C may be melted or discarded at all, doesn't matter, I want

问题 I have a number of commits on github that look like this: Is there a way of rebasing so that I can get rid of this and simply have the commit marked as by me? 回答1: First I would check that your git is configured with the correct user information. Run git config --list to verify that everything is correct. You can also try playing with interactive rebasing to edit a commit. Enter interactive rebase git rebase -i <commit ID> Change the commit you want to change to edit , save and exit Recommit

问题 I've somehow got some duplicate commits in a branch, each with the same changes. It's a public branch, merged from several branches by several users. I need to periodically rebase this branch onto the master branch of another repo, and these duplicates make it clumsy. Is there a way to remove these and push them to the public repo w/out making it complicated for other users working from the branch? 回答1: filter-branch is not necessary in this case IMHO and as Jefromi mentioned without making

问题 Since VS2008(Is it right?), MSVC linker option has a Base Address Randomization. What the main purpose of this feature? What I only glad to is, I don't need to rebase my Dlls manually anymore. Is that all? Was it their purpose? Is there any other benefit else. 回答1: I believe you'll find that the idea is to change the entry points making it harder to exploit them - ie now an attacker not only needs to be able get executable code into memory but also work out which addresses it should be

问题 I've often heard it said that using git rebase reduces the number of merge conflicts as opposed to git merge, but I've never found an explanation of why this is the case. Simply replaying one set of changes on top of another set of changes doesn't magically dispel the inherent conflict when two people both modify the same line of code, so what makes rebase better? Can anyone provide a simple example where a merge would have conflicts but a rebase doesn't? UPDATE: After 3 additional years of

问题 I'm trying to rebase -i a few commits that occurred a while back in my history. Say I have a log like this: * 5e32fb0 (HEAD -> master) Add latest feature * 106c31a Add new feature * 2bdac33 Add great feature ...100 other commits... * 64bd9e7 Add test 3 * 3e1066e Add test 2 * 26c612d Add test 1 * 694bdda Initialize repo and I want to squash the 3 test commits. In these circumstances, git rebase -i HEAD~106 isn't very practical. What I'm looking for instead is something like git rebase -i