rebase

问题 I'm trying to rebase a commit. However, any time I run git rebase -i f83eff3ffc8 , for example, a MacVim window opens, that's empty (there is no information in the file). Then once I write and close the file (even though it's empty), I get a Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/clicktocall-hotfix message. The file name is .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo . I also tried running it with sudo but this didn't make a difference. What could be the problem? I've never successfully completed

问题 When I do a git svn rebase, it tells me that it had a CONFLICT (add/add) in a file that's not even in the SVN repository, I added it after my initial git clone. When I fire up meld, my favorite merge tool, I see two versions of the file, one more recent than the other. So I resolve the merge conflict by taking all the changes for the more recent version, and do a 'git add' on the file. Git status does not show the change staged for commit, and git rebase --continue says: No changes - did you

问题 We forked and opensource project and developed features on top of that. These features are in particular branch Now I am trying to rebase our code with new upstream branch. The rebase fails many conflicts in error messages. I wish to override all the error messages with incoming commits but I could not find how to do that. From what I found, the following command would override all conflicts with upstream code git rebase -Xours upstream/branch But I wish to very specifically override those

问题 Suppose we have the following revision graph: A-B (master) \ C (feature-a) \ D (feature-b) [depends on feature a] \ E (feature-c) [depends on feature b] And master is then modified to follow with commit F . Is there any simple way to rebase E onto F (master) so that branches feature-a , feature-b and feature-c all end up as follows: A-B-F (master) \ C' (feature-a) \ D' (feature-b) \ E' (feature-c) ? In real world situations there are obviously multiple patches between each feature so re

问题 I encountered a strange situation with git in which I had a feature branch that modified some files and deleted one file "foo.js". When I rebased onto master via "git rebase master feature", I encountered the following type of conflict: CONFLICT (rename/delete): src/main/resources/com/blah/bar.js deleted in Change some js and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of src/main/resources/com/blah/bar.js left in tree. The odd thing is that neither neither the master branch nor the feature branch had even

问题 In the process of moving to use git we have taken a production version of a solution and committed it as master . Then we took a development version and made an orphan branch called develop . (Background: why we are getting a bit tangled up here is that the there was not a clean evolution from the development version to the production version. Plus there is a complexity to assembling the solutions involved that makes us want to avoid scrapping the repo and trying again. In the end, we just

问题 Is it correct that a git merge will succeed with no conflicts if and only if the corresponding git rebase will succeed with no conflicts? 回答1: No, and in fact there's a trivial case where merge works fine but rebase doesn't: ...--o--A <-- mainline \ B--C--!C <-- branch where C is a commit that conflicts with A , and !C is its reversion. Merging branch back into mainline is equivalent in source-tree effect to merging commit B back into mainline, while rebasing copies both C (which conflicts

问题 Can I squash a range of commits for a local feature/topic branch using rebase that does not include the most recent commit? This is for commits that I want to prepare before they get merged and pushed to a public repo. I was working quickly and made a bunch of minor changes with poor titles and descriptions that I want to squash into two or three separate logical commits with a great comments. Can I select a range of commits between 329aed9 and af39283 that could be at any point in this

问题 I apologize in advance. I am very new to git and I just took over a project that is stored in git. Here is my situation - The project I took over has a directory structure that isn't standard in my organization. I created new branches with the new dir structure, I used git mv. I need to make the branch names standard. There is already a branch with a standard name but with the wrong dir structure. I am working on a branch named "develop", it has the dir structure we want. I mostly understand

问题 I have a local git repository and I run the following: git.exe pull -v --no-rebase --progress "origin" // pull 1 (make a few local commits) git.exe pull -v --no-rebase --progress "origin" // pull 2 git log --pretty=format:"%h - %an : %s" // log 1 git rebase -i HEAD~4 (move local commit 1 down 2 positions) git log --pretty=format:"%h - %an : %s" // log 2 git.exe pull -v --no-rebase --progress "origin" // pull 3 git log --pretty=format:"%h - %an : %s" // log 3 After doing this all commits to