processor

问题 I am setting up my InstallShield to install my package as 64 bit (into Program Files not Program Files x86) by. My processor is: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU InstallShield => General Information => Summary Information Stream => Template Summary From Intel32;1033 to Intel64;1033 And it gives me the general error message: This installation package is not supported by this processor Then I set the value to: Amd64;1033 or x64;1033 And it magically work. But weird thing is, my processor is Intel,

问题 The L1/L2 cache are inclusive in Intel and L1 / L2 cache is 8 way associativity, means in a set there are 8 different cache lines exist. The cache lines are operated as a whole, means if I want to remove few bytes from a cache line, the whole cache line will be removed , not the only those bytes which I want to remove. Am I right ? Now, my question is whenever a cache line of a set is removed/evicted from cache, either by some other process or by using clflush(manual eviction of a cache line

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63440762/could-a-processor-be-made-that-supports-multiple-isas-ex-arm-x86

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63440762/could-a-processor-be-made-that-supports-multiple-isas-ex-arm-x86

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63440762/could-a-processor-be-made-that-supports-multiple-isas-ex-arm-x86

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63440762/could-a-processor-be-made-that-supports-multiple-isas-ex-arm-x86

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63440762/could-a-processor-be-made-that-supports-multiple-isas-ex-arm-x86

问题 Is it determined by size of the address buss; if yes then was 8086 a 20-bit processor? If no what is criteria for assigning a bit number like 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit to processor? 回答1: It's not well defined. Broadly, as xtofl points out, it's the size of the atomic unit of computation (in early computers, this wasn't always synonymous with "register"). So the PDP-10 was a 36 bit machine, a 8080 was 8 bit, and a IBM 360 or Intel 80386 is "32 bits". But there are exceptions. The Motorola 68000

问题 Is it determined by size of the address buss; if yes then was 8086 a 20-bit processor? If no what is criteria for assigning a bit number like 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit to processor? 回答1: It's not well defined. Broadly, as xtofl points out, it's the size of the atomic unit of computation (in early computers, this wasn't always synonymous with "register"). So the PDP-10 was a 36 bit machine, a 8080 was 8 bit, and a IBM 360 or Intel 80386 is "32 bits". But there are exceptions. The Motorola 68000

问题 Is it determined by size of the address buss; if yes then was 8086 a 20-bit processor? If no what is criteria for assigning a bit number like 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit to processor? 回答1: It's not well defined. Broadly, as xtofl points out, it's the size of the atomic unit of computation (in early computers, this wasn't always synonymous with "register"). So the PDP-10 was a 36 bit machine, a 8080 was 8 bit, and a IBM 360 or Intel 80386 is "32 bits". But there are exceptions. The Motorola 68000