procedural-programming

How to use append-map in Racket (Scheme)

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-08 19:51:27
问题 I don't fully understand what the append-map command does in racket, nor do I understand how to use it and I'm having a pretty hard time finding some decently understandable documentation online for it. Could someone possibly demonstrate what exactly the command does and how it works? 回答1: The append-map procedure is useful for creating a single list out of a list of sublists after applying a procedure to each sublist. In other words, this code: (append-map proc lst) ... Is semantically

Practical Explanation : Can anyone Explain the difference between POPS and OOPS with Example?

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-12-08 12:06:15
问题 I visited so many sites about the differences between Procedular Oriented Programming and Object Oriented Programming , but I did not get Practical answer . Everyone is saying theoritical answer . Can anyone give Practical Explanation for this ? 回答1: Procedural programming is a list or set of instructions telling a computer what to do step by step and how to perform from the first code to the second code. the best example of a procedural language is C for e.g here is a python code for

Differences in procedural and object-oriented implementations of mysql in php? [closed]

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2019-12-07 18:18:30
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 6 years ago . Is there a significant difference in using an object oriented approach over a procedural approach when implementing mysql in php? On

What GUI libraries are not object-oriented? [closed]

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2019-12-06 06:43:58
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 7 years ago . I have been using C a lot lately, and want to explore programming more than just console applications. However, most GUI libraries are

What GUI libraries are not object-oriented? [closed]

醉酒当歌 提交于 2019-12-04 13:45:42
I have been using C a lot lately, and want to explore programming more than just console applications. However, most GUI libraries are object-oriented, and it is very difficult to program with them in programming languages which are not object-oriented such as C. Even object-oriented GUI libraries such as GTK+ that are designed for C require a lot of boilerplate. Because I am having difficulty with these object-oriented libraries I am wondering what GUI libraries are not object-oriented? I don't know of any modern GUI toolkit that isn't object oriented. OO is simply a very useful programming

How do i get out of the habit of procedural programming and into object oriented programming?

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-12-03 18:26:33
问题 I'm hoping to get some tips to kinda help me break out of what i consider after all these years a bad habit of procedural programming. Every time i attempt to do a project in OOP i end up eventually reverting to procedural. I guess i'm not completely convinced with OOP (even though i think i've heard everything good about it!). So i guess any good practical examples of common programming tasks that i often carry out such as user authentication/management, data parsing, CMS/Blogging/eComs are

Development Cost of Procedural Programming vs. OOP?

可紊 提交于 2019-12-03 12:25:52
问题 I come from a fairly strong OO background, the benefits of OOD & OOP are second nature to me, but recently I've found myself in a development shop tied to a procedural programming habits. The implementation language has some OOP features, they are not used in optimal ways. Update: everyone seems to have an opinion about this topic, as do I, but the question was: Have there been any good comparative studies contrasting the cost of software development using procedural programming languages

Are statistical programming languages like R/SAS considered functional or procedural [closed]

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-12-03 06:21:09
Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post . I still don't understand the difference after reading this So, rather than asking what is the difference between functional vs procedural programming, I thought, maybe a language that I am familiar with can serve as an example. Hence, my questions: Are the languages R/SAS considered procedural or functional? R is primarily a functional programming language. It does have some exceptions

Development Cost of Procedural Programming vs. OOP?

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-03 03:36:25
I come from a fairly strong OO background, the benefits of OOD & OOP are second nature to me, but recently I've found myself in a development shop tied to a procedural programming habits. The implementation language has some OOP features, they are not used in optimal ways. Update: everyone seems to have an opinion about this topic, as do I, but the question was: Have there been any good comparative studies contrasting the cost of software development using procedural programming languages versus Object Oriented languages? Some commenters have pointed out the dubious nature of trying to compare

Does procedural programming have any advantages over OOP?

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2019-12-03 02:38:44
问题 [Edit:] Earlier I asked this as a perhaps poorly-framed question about when to use OOP versus when to use procedural programming - some responses implied I was asking for help understanding OOP. On the contrary, I have used OOP a lot but want to know when to use a procedural approach. Judging by the responses, I take it that there is a fairly strong consensus that OOP is usually a better all-round approach but that a procedural language should be used if the OOP architecture will not provide