private-members

I was trying to setup a unit test for a private inner class, but had very little success: namespace Stats.Model { public class DailyStat { private class DailyStatKey // The one to test { private DateTime date; public DateTime Date { get { return date; } set { date = value.Date; } } public StatType Type { get; set; } public override int GetHashCode() { return Date.Year * 1000000 + Date.Month * 10000 + Date.Day * 100 + (int)Type; } public override bool Equals(object obj) { DailyStatKey otherKey = obj as DailyStatKey; if (otherKey == null) return false; return (this.Date == otherKey.Date && this

I've been reading a lot of threads and blog articles about how to implement a singleton in objective-c, several of them maybe being a bit deprecated (year 2010 or earlier), and it seems like people have different opinions regarding this issue... Does Apple have documentation about implementing a singleton? I couldn't find it. If so, could somebody tell me where? I need a singleton for a class that has some both public and private variables. Currently, this is the implementation I have for such class: @interface MySingleton () @property (strong, nonatomic) NSString *state; @end @implementation

We have a Student class in our business model. something struck me as strange, if we are manipulating one student from another student, the students private members are visible... this strikes me as a little indecent :) class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Student s1 = new Student(); Student s2 = new Student(); s1.ExamineStudentsMembers(s2); } } public class Student { private String _studentsPrivateMember; public Student() { _studentsPrivateMember = DateTime.Now.Ticks.ToString(); } public void ExamineStudentsMembers(Student anotherStudent) { //this seems very wrong Console

While I hate to beat a horse to death on this subject (I've read through various articles about this), but would just like to get more opinions on this matter before I create my "own convention" to use from now on while coding in Objective-C. The convention that I want to figure out is ultimately how to (using best coding practices for production level code) use private methods in a class. Coming from a background in C#, when I write classes, usually there is a block of code that is repeated in multiple public methods (such as error checking, or WCF service connection setup). I usually create

What does @ means before a field name in Groovy? For some classes I am able to access private fields that are not directly accessible, let's take ComposedClosure for example: public class Person { private String name } def u = new Person(name:"Ron") println u.@name //Ron println u.name //Ron a = {2} >> {3} println a.@first //first closure object println a.first //runtime error It allows you to override groovy's use of property accessors. If you write: println u.name groovy will invoke the automatically generated getter Person.getName(). If you write: println u.@name it will go directly to the

I was looking at the request parser from the boost::asio example and I was wondering why the private member functions like is_char() are static ? : class request_parser { ... private: static bool is_char(int c); ... }; It is used in the function consume which is not a static function: boost::tribool request_parser::consume(request& req, char input) { switch (state_) { case method_start: if (!is_char(input) || is_ctl(input) || is_tspecial(input)) { return false; } ... Only member functions can call is_char() and no static member function is calling is_char() . So is there a reason why these