Java Double vs double: class type vs primitive type
I was curious to what the performance differences between Java's class and primitive type for double were. So I created a little benchmark and found the class type to be 3x-7x slower than the primitive type. (3x on local machine OSX, 7x on ideone) Here is the test: class Main { public static void main(String args[]) { long bigDTime, littleDTime; { long start = System.nanoTime(); Double d = 0.0; for (Double i = 0.0; i < 1432143.341; i += 0.1) { d += i; } long end = System.nanoTime(); bigDTime = end - start; System.out.println(bigDTime); } { long start = System.nanoTime(); double d = 0.0; for