pre-increment

c++ spaces in operators , what are the rules

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-12-13 13:52:58
问题 Does spaces have any meaning in these expressions: assume: int a = 1; int b = 2; 1) int c = a++ +b; Or, 2) int c = a+ ++b; When I run these two in visual studio, I get different results. Is that the correct behavior, and what does the spec says? In general, what should be evaluated first, post-increment or pre-increment? Edit: I should say that c =a+++b; Does not compile on visual studio. But I think it should. The postfix++ seems to be evaluated first. 回答1: Is that the correct behavior Yes,

'In any case, follow the guideline “prefer ++i over i++” and you won't go wrong.' What is the reason behind this in C?

空扰寡人 提交于 2019-12-13 09:35:18
问题 I had come across this answer to this question. In one of the line, the author mention's: In any case, follow the guideline "prefer ++i over i++ " and you won't go wrong. I know that ++i is slightly faster than i++ , but thought that there is no reason for them to go wrong. I searched for a while, and the closest I could get to was this. It explained clearly that why is it preferred to use ++i , but not still how could you go wrong using i++ . So can anyone tell me how can i++ go wrong? NOTE:

unexpected behaviour of pre and post increment in c language gcc compiler [duplicate]

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-12-13 09:17:25
问题 This question already has answers here : Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior? (14 answers) printf(“%d %d %d\n”,++a, a++,a) output [duplicate] (3 answers) Closed 2 years ago . If n has the value 5 then output: printf("%d %d", n++, ++n); //should be 5 and 7 But I get as output 6 and 7. 回答1: Multiple unsequenced modifications result to such kind of Undefined Behavior . There are tons of results if you search for it, e.g. this question. Next time compile with

Why does post increment operator not work although preincrement does work in this code?

谁都会走 提交于 2019-12-13 03:38:36
问题 I am really new to programming (I'm an electronics and comm. engineer) and I am not able to figure out why one program works and the other one doesn't. I'd like to get a good understanding of recursive functions before going any further with my learning. I would appreciate any help regarding this. I know the difference between the x++ and --x. But in this context of this program, I thought both of these programs should run the same way. But they don't. void rec(int x) { if(x>0) rec(x--);

K&R seems to prefer pre-increment

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-12-12 20:06:35
问题 I'm working through K&R and am presently on Exercise 1-16. It occurs to me that thus far only pre-increment has been used in the book. Most other tutorial books and indeed source code I've seen tend to favour post-increment, except where there is an obvious affect such as in while loops etc. Is this a stylistic or technical consideration on the part of K&R? Or do I just need to be further through the book to get my answer?! 回答1: There are several aspects to this. Semantics The semantics of

Pre and post increment in a for loop [duplicate]

我的梦境 提交于 2019-12-12 05:27:38
问题 This question already has answers here : Is ++i really faster than i++ in for-loops in java? (11 answers) Closed 6 years ago . Is it more performant to do a pre-increment vs a post-increment in a for loop in java ? Sample code : for (int i=0; i<10; i++) and for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) I notice that when i do a pre-increment, the execution time is lesser that when i do the post-increment. Any suggestions on why this might be the case ? thanks. 回答1: I compiled a minimal example (Oracle jdk1.7.0_07

Increment, preincrement and postincrement

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-12-11 05:17:08
问题 Help me to resolve this please. The steps that follows that expressions are: //Expression offSpring1[m1++] = temp1; //Steps: 1.- increment m1 2.- assign temp1 to offSpring I have always thought that the expression inside the brackets was the first to be done. But now I am confuse. So if a write this: //Expression offSpring1[++m1] = temp1; //Steps would be: 1.- assign temp1 to offSpring 2.- increment m1 If the steps would be the same as first ones, what is the difference between i++ and ++i?

Why java statement evaluation is happening like these ?

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-11 01:11:34
问题 int z = 1; System.out.println(z++ == ++z); System.out.println(++z == z++); the output will be: false true and I don't get why, please explain this to me. 回答1: First You Should Clear About Pre Increment & Post Increment Lets Have A Look int i=1; int j=i++; int k=++i; here in the value of j will be 1 and k will be 3 why means in i++ first store the value i into j and after which increments the value of i so j=1,i=2 ok :) now in the case of ++i where first increment the value and after that

Post-Incrementing/decrementing in recursive method calls (Java)

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-12-10 20:02:17
问题 Say you have a recursive method, and you post-increment/decrement a value in the recursive call. Why will this result in a stack overflow exception when a pre-increment/decrement will not? Ex. numberCount(currentNumber++); //Stack overflow exception numberCount(++currentNumber); //No stack overflow exception Thanks in advance for any clarification. 回答1: The first numberCount(currentNumber++); //Stack overflow exception is equivalent to: numberCount(currentNumber); currentNumber += 1; while

Pre increment and post increment

梦想与她 提交于 2019-12-10 10:35:23
问题 I'm having trouble understanding how Post Increment ( ++ ), Pre Increment ( -- ) and addition/subtraction work together in an example. x++ means add 1 to the variable. x-- means subtract 1 from the variable. But I am confused with this example: int x = 2, y = 3, z = 1;` y++ + z-- + x++; I assume this means 3(+1) + 1(-1) + 2(+1) Which means the result should be 7. But when I compile it, I get 6 . I don't understand. int main() { int x=2, y=3, z=1; int result; result = y++ + z-- + x++; //this