port

How to set xampp open localhost:8080 instead of just localhost

谁都会走 提交于 2020-02-18 05:12:17
问题 I use XAMPP 1.7.3. Apache and MySQL installed. Nothing else. Apache installed on default port 80. Clicking on Admin next to Apache opens http://localhost/xampp/ . Which works as expected. I navigated to xampp/apache/conf/httpd.conf and edited it. Set Listen 8080 . Now http://localhost:8080/xampp/ works as expected but the Admin button still opens http://localhost/xampp/ which does not open anything. I have restarted the computer after doing so with no results. How to make XAMPP apache admin

How to set xampp open localhost:8080 instead of just localhost

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2020-02-18 05:11:47
问题 I use XAMPP 1.7.3. Apache and MySQL installed. Nothing else. Apache installed on default port 80. Clicking on Admin next to Apache opens http://localhost/xampp/ . Which works as expected. I navigated to xampp/apache/conf/httpd.conf and edited it. Set Listen 8080 . Now http://localhost:8080/xampp/ works as expected but the Admin button still opens http://localhost/xampp/ which does not open anything. I have restarted the computer after doing so with no results. How to make XAMPP apache admin

Connecting two UDP clients to one port (Send and Receive)

半腔热情 提交于 2020-02-11 04:28:30
问题 I tried the suggestion from this question with very little success. Please... any help will be greatly appreciated! Here is my code: static void Main(string[] args) { IPEndPoint localpt = new IPEndPoint(IPAddress.Any, 6000); UdpClient udpServer = new UdpClient(localpt); udpServer.Client.SetSocketOption( SocketOptionLevel.Socket, SocketOptionName.ReuseAddress, true); UdpClient udpServer2 = new UdpClient(); udpServer2.Client.SetSocketOption( SocketOptionLevel.Socket, SocketOptionName

Connecting two UDP clients to one port (Send and Receive)

徘徊边缘 提交于 2020-02-11 04:26:50
问题 I tried the suggestion from this question with very little success. Please... any help will be greatly appreciated! Here is my code: static void Main(string[] args) { IPEndPoint localpt = new IPEndPoint(IPAddress.Any, 6000); UdpClient udpServer = new UdpClient(localpt); udpServer.Client.SetSocketOption( SocketOptionLevel.Socket, SocketOptionName.ReuseAddress, true); UdpClient udpServer2 = new UdpClient(); udpServer2.Client.SetSocketOption( SocketOptionLevel.Socket, SocketOptionName

Why can a socket connect() to its own ephemeral port?

对着背影说爱祢 提交于 2020-02-03 05:07:26
问题 I can reliably get a Winsock socket to connect() to itself if I connect to localhost with a port in the range of automatically assigned ephemeral ports (5000–65534). Specifically, Windows appears to have a system-wide rolling port number which is the next port that it will try to assign as a local port number for a client socket. If I create sockets until the assigned number is just below my target port number, and then repeatedly create a socket and attempt to connect to that port number, I

Why can a socket connect() to its own ephemeral port?

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2020-02-03 05:07:24
问题 I can reliably get a Winsock socket to connect() to itself if I connect to localhost with a port in the range of automatically assigned ephemeral ports (5000–65534). Specifically, Windows appears to have a system-wide rolling port number which is the next port that it will try to assign as a local port number for a client socket. If I create sockets until the assigned number is just below my target port number, and then repeatedly create a socket and attempt to connect to that port number, I

NGINX not routing to the net core Project (with port other than 80)

谁都会走 提交于 2020-02-03 00:24:06
问题 I have the following in the default config file in the /etc/nginx/sites-available folder server { listen 80; location / { proxy_pass http://10.XX.XX.XX:5000; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection keep-alive; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade; proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; } } server { listen 81; location

Correct way to start docker daemon listening to specific port

扶醉桌前 提交于 2020-02-01 03:42:33
问题 I´m new to docker and want to start it in daemon mode listening to a specific IP-adress and port. In the documentation it is said that this can be done by writing sudo /usr/bin/docker daemon -H 0.0.0.0:5555 . It then says that I can list running containers with this command docker ps . If I try this I get the following message: Get http:///var/run/docker.sock/v1.20/containers/json?all=1: dial unix /var/run/docker.sock: no such file or directory. Are you trying to connect to a TLS-enabled

NGINX - Reverse proxy multiple API on different ports

孤者浪人 提交于 2020-01-31 03:19:25
问题 I have the following API(s): localhost:300/api/customers/ localhost:400/api/customers/:id/billing localhost:500/api/orders I'd like to use NGINX to have them all run under the following location: localhost:443/api/ This seems very difficult because of customers spanning two servers. Here's my failed attempt starting with orders server { listen 443; server_name localhost; location /api/orders { proxy_pass https://localhost:500/api/orders; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X

adb forward remote port to local machine

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2020-01-28 14:11:37
问题 This is a query regarding the usage of adb on android. Is there a way to forward the remote port i.e. port on the android device/emulator to the local machine to which the device is connected? $ adb forward tcp:port1 tcp:port2 # forwards the local port port1 on the machine to port2 on the device. Thanks in advance! 回答1: Recently google updated ADB service. And added reverse command that should do the job. From reverse documentation: This implements the adb reverse feature, i.e. the ability to