overriding

Strange behavior when overriding private methods

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-27 18:36:04
Consider the following piece of code: class foo { private function m() { echo 'foo->m() '; } public function call() { $this->m(); } } class bar extends foo { private function m() { echo 'bar->m() '; } public function callbar() { $this->m(); } } $bar = new bar; $bar->call(); $bar->callbar(); Now, changing the visibility of the m() method, I get: ( + for public , - for private ) Visibility bar->call() bar->callbar() ====================================================== -foo->m(), -bar->m() foo->m() bar->m() -foo->m(), +bar->m() foo->m() bar->m() +foo->m(), -bar->m() ERROR ERROR +foo->m(), +bar-

Why isn't my new operator called

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-11-27 18:17:28
问题 I wanted to see that a dynamically loaded library (loaded with dlopen etc.) really uses its own new an delete operators and not these ones defined in the calling program. So I wrote the following library.cpp #include <exception> #include <new> #include <cstdlib> #include <cstdio> #include "base.hpp" void* operator new(size_t size) { std::printf("New of library called\n"); void *p=std::malloc(size); if (p == 0) // did malloc succeed? throw std::bad_alloc(); // ANSI/ISO compliant behavior

Overriding vs Virtual

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-11-27 18:08:00
What is the purpose of using the reserved word virtual in front of functions? If I want a child class to override a parent function, I just declare the same function such as void draw(){} . class Parent { public: void say() { std::cout << "1"; } }; class Child : public Parent { public: void say() { std::cout << "2"; } }; int main() { Child* a = new Child(); a->say(); return 0; } The output is 2. So again, why would the reserved word virtual be necessary in the header of say() ? Thanks a bunch. krolth This is the classic question of how polymorphism works I think. The main idea is that you want

Java - inline class definition

前提是你 提交于 2019-11-27 18:03:22
问题 I've seen a couple of examples similar to this in Java, and am hoping someone can explain what is happening. It seems like a new class can be defined inline, which seems really weird to me. The first printout line is expected, since it is simply the toString. However the 2nd seems like the function can be overriden inline. Is there a technical term for this? Or any documentation which goes into more depth? Thanks! If I have the following code: public class Apple { public String toString() {

Overriding interface's variable?

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-11-27 18:01:53
问题 As I read from various Java book and tutorials, variables declared in a interface are constants and can't be overridden. I made a simple code to test it interface A_INTERFACE { int var=100; } class A_CLASS implements A_INTERFACE { int var=99; //test void printx() { System.out.println("var = " + var); } } class hello { public static void main(String[] args) { new A_CLASS().printx(); } } and it prints out var = 99 Is var get overridden? I am totally confused. Thank you for any suggestions!

how can I override jquery's .serialize to include unchecked checkboxes

…衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2019-11-27 17:45:28
问题 I have read quite a few different methods of having html checkboxes get posted to the server, but I am really looking to do it without modifying anything except for $.serialize. I ideally, I would like checked boxes to be posted as on, and unchecked to be posted as 0, empty, or null. I'm a little confused by jquery's inner-workings, but I've got this so far, but it sets unchecked checkboxes to 'on'... Can anyone tell me how to continue this modification below? $.fn.extend({ serializeArray:

Implementing Comparable, compareTo name clash: “have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other”

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2019-11-27 17:40:55
问题 I'd like to have a compareTo method that takes a Real (a class for working with arbitrarily large and precise real numbers [well, as long as it's less than 2^31 in length at the moment]) and a compareTo method that takes an Object, but Java isn't letting me and I'm not experienced enough to know why. I just tried to modify the class to implement Comparable and I got these error messages below. I don't really understand what the error messages mean but I know it's got something to do with the

What does @Override mean?

心已入冬 提交于 2019-11-27 17:16:46
public class NaiveAlien extends Alien { @Override public void harvest(){} } I was trying to understand my friend's code, and I do not get the syntax, @Override in the code. What does that do and why do we need in coding? Thanks. It's a hint for the compiler to let it know that you're overriding the method of a parent class (or interface in Java 6). If the compiler detects that there IS no function to override, it will warn you (or error). This is extremely useful to quickly identify typos or API changes. Say you're trying to override your parent class' method harvest() but spell it harvset() ,

Override and overload in C++

守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-11-27 16:50:36
Yes, I do understand the difference between them. What I want to know is: why OVERRIDE a method? What is the good in doing it? In case of overload: the only advantage is you haven't to think in different names to functions? Overloading generally means that you have two or more functions in the same scope having the same name. The function that better matches the arguments when a call is made wins and is called. Important to note, as opposed to calling a virtual function, is that the function that's called is selected at compile time. It all depends on the static type of the argument. If you

Polymorphic method in Constructor (Java)

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-11-27 16:18:51
问题 Class A calls the public method f() in the Constructor. Class B overrides method f() with its own implementation. Suppose you intantiate Object B .. method f() of Object B would be called in the Constructor of Object A , although Object B is not fully initialized. Can anyone explain this behavior? EDIT: Yes, it's not recommended practice.. yet i don't understand why Java is not calling the f() implementation of the base-Class A instead of "reaching out" to the f() implementation of the