overriding

Overriding methods in Javascript

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-28 10:00:53
I would like to know what is the difference between overriding methods with prototypes and without prototypes. Consider: Example 1: function Animal() { this.sleep = function () { alert("animal sleeping"); }; this.eat = function () { alert("animal eating"); }; } function Dog() { this.eat = function () { alert("Dog eating"); }; } Dog.prototype = new Animal; var dog = new Dog; dog.eat(); Example 2: function Animal() { } function Dog() { } Animal.prototype.sleep = function () { alert("animal sleeping"); }; Animal.prototype.eat = function () { alert("animal eating"); }; Dog.prototype = new Animal;

What does @AttributeOverride mean?

安稳与你 提交于 2019-11-28 09:37:22
I'm currently coming (back) up to speed with EJB and while I was away it changed drastically (so far for the better). However, I've come across a concept that I am struggling with and would like to understand better as it seems to be used in our (where I work, not me and all the voices in my head) code quite a bit. Here's the example I've found in a book. It's part of an example showing how to use the @EmbeddedId annotation: @Entity public class Employee implements java.io.Serializable { @EmbeddedId @AttributeOverrides({ @AttributeOverride(name="lastName", column=@Column(name="LAST_NAME"),

Why does non-const method hide const overload?

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-11-28 09:18:17
问题 Given the code below: class A { public: A(): value( 0 ) {} int* get() { return &value; } const int& get() const { return value; } private: int value; }; int main() { A a; const int& ref_value = a.get(); } results in the following compilation error: prog.cpp: In function 'int main()': prog.cpp:23:35: error: invalid conversion from 'int*' to 'int' const int& ref_value = a.get(); ^ It seems that the overloaded get() method with const modifier does get ignored completely and the compiler sees

Override rails helpers with access to original

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-11-28 09:00:48
I want to use rails' familiar helpers, but with slightly altered functionality. The way I see it, I want to be able to do something like: module AwesomeHelper #... create alias of stylesheet_link_tag to old_stylesheet_link_tag def stylesheet_link_tag(*args) if @be_awesome awesome_stylesheet_link_tag *args else old_stylesheet_link_tag *args end end end The way I see it, I have three options: Monkey patching: Reopening the rails helper module. If the rails team ever change the name of their helper module, my code becomes a source of brittleness. Not insurmountable, but not ideal. Use different

Magento - overriding Adminhtml block

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-11-28 08:58:41
问题 I've spent hours trying to override the Magento block for the "Add store" and "Edit store" pages in an extension, to add another text box to it. After Going through books and Googling, I've found several solutions which people say are working, however not for me. One recommendation was this one. I've copied the supposedly correct solution from Lee Saferite which works for the original poster but not for me. Of course, I changed the values to the class I'm overriding and the new modified class

Strange case of static method override in java

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-11-28 08:49:18
问题 It is written everywhere that static method cannot be overriden, but when I try to reduce the access specifier say from public to protected it gives an error. for example public class StaticOverrideFunda { public static void foo(){ System.out.println("Parent Foo"); } } public class B extends StaticOverrideFunda{ protected static void foo(){ System.out.println("Child Foo"); } /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub B.foo(); } } It says

override existing onkeydown function

爱⌒轻易说出口 提交于 2019-11-28 08:39:42
问题 My extensions go through every input entered on an on any website that is loaded. What I do is I consider every onkeydown and manipulate it if it has some value. my background js file contains the following: document.onkeydown = returnKey; function returnKey(evt) { var evt = (evt) ? evt : ((event) ? event : null); var node = (evt.target) ? evt.target : ((evt.srcElement) ? evt.srcElement : null); if ( node.value == 'fi' ) { evt.srcElement.value = "??"; } } My problem is when I have websites

Method overriding in Java throwing exceptions

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-11-28 08:21:52
问题 I am trying to understand Object Casting and Method Overriding. I have a piece of code: public class ExceptionClass{ void m() throws SQLException{} } class A extends ExceptionClass{ void m() throws Exception{} } This gives an error "Exception Exception is not compatible with throws clause in ExceptionClass.m()". The same if I write as : public class ExceptionClass{ void m() throws SQLException{} } class A extends ExceptionClass{ void m() throws RuntimeException{} } This doesnt give any error

Is there a way to prevent a method from being overridden in subclasses?

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-11-28 08:06:39
Is anyone aware of a language feature or technique in C++ to prevent a child class from over riding a particular method in the parent class? class Base { public: bool someGuaranteedResult() { return true; } }; class Child : public Base { public: bool someGuaranteedResult() { return false; /* Haha I broke things! */ } }; Even though it's not virtual, this is still allowed (at least in the Metrowerks compiler I'm using), all you get is a compile time warning about hiding non-virtual inherited function X. A couple of ideas: Make your function private. Do not make your function virtual. This doesn

How does equals() method work in Java [duplicate]

寵の児 提交于 2019-11-28 08:06:03
问题 This question already has an answer here: What is the difference between == and equals() in Java? 23 answers The equals method compares whether two object values are equal or not. My question is how it compares the two objects? How can it tell the two objects are equal or not? I want to know based on what it compares the two objects. I am not including the hashCode method. 回答1: The default implementation, the one of the class java.lang.Object , simply tests the references are to the same