overflow

jni table overflow even after deleteLocalRef

由 点点圈 提交于 2019-12-01 04:42:14
When I run the code, I get an error "failed adding to JNI local ref table has 512 entries" This is my code: jstring pJNIData = pJNIEnv->NewStringUTF ( variables[0].GetStringValue() ); pJNIEnv->CallStaticVoidMethod ( pJNIActivityClass, pJNIMethodIDStartTime, pJNIData ) ; pJNIEnv->DeleteLocalRef(pJNIData); I have read several suggestions, but none of them work! In spite of the DeleteLocalRef , it fails to works. The function is used in a profiler that literally calls all the functions... I have seen this when a JNI method called Java code (in my case, the method was not static). As I understand,

微信小程序iOS下拉白屏晃动，坑坑坑

由 本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-12-01 04:34:58
感觉ios的小程序每个页面都可以下拉出现白屏 有时页面带有滑动的属性会跟着晃动，体验不是很好 解决办法： 先禁止页面下拉 <config> { navigationBarTitleText: "购物车", disableScroll:true } </config> 这样的话页面整个都拉不动了，下面溢出的内容就拉不出来了，此时用overflow：scroll间接滑动 .content{ width:100%; height：600rpx； overflow-y: scroll； } 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/ll15888/p/11654288.html

Overflow: auto does not work in Firefox

由 梦想与她 提交于 2019-12-01 04:13:06
I have a table. Its <td> have overflow: auto . The width is set to be 100px. In Firefox only , text that exceeds 100px is not hidden and replaced with a scrollbar. How can I hide content and have a scrollbar when it exceeds the width of its container? http://jsfiddle.net/be6tM/10/ jhunlio this question from here maybe solve your problem nickb answer: "Try wrapping it in a <div> . I'm pretty sure the overflow attribute is not defined for a <td> element, at least in HTML4 it's not." try to put your overflow:auto to the wrapper hope this can help you pre, div { width:100%; overflow: auto

scroll bar on div with overflow:auto and percentage height

由 独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-01 04:08:12
Is it possible to create a div that adjusts to the size of the browser and is also scrollable? I want to use overflow:auto on the div and percentage height of 90% . The structure of the page is <body style="height:100%"> <div id=header style="height:100%">headerinfo</div> <div id=content style="height:100%;overflow:auto">content which is replaced dynamically</div> </body> Will overflow:auto work without a known px height somewhere in the hierarchy? In answer to your question, yes overflow:auto will work, but you will need height: 100% on the HTML tag as well: html,body { height:100%; margin: 0

Strange behavior of “overflow: auto” on Chrome

由 荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-12-01 03:28:56
I'm developing a site with a blog section. I need this section to have a fixed height. In order to be able to see all the posts in the blog I added an overflow: auto so it shows a scrollbar when needed. <div id="container"> <div id="content"> <div class="post"> This is a long post.... </div> <div class="post"> This is a long post.... </div> <div class="post"> This is a long post.... </div> .... .... .... .... </div> </div> #container { overflow: hidden; } #content { height: 200px; overflow: auto; border: 1px solid red; } .post { margin: 20px 0; } I tested this on Chrome, Firefox and IE. The

IE + overflow: hidden

由 会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2019-12-01 03:20:52
I don't know is that an issue or bug, but when I use overflow: hidden , selecting the text and moving the cursor to the page bottom in IE, the page is scrolling (I tried IE9-IE11)! When I use Firefox/Opera/Chrome/Safari the page isn't scrolling... I have to use overflow: hidden , but it has an odd behavior in IE. So, my question is: how can I avoid page scrolling in IE? Use -ms-scroll-limit: 0 0 0 0; to prevent any scrolling whatsoever in IE 10+. For older browsers you can write a workaround using JavaScript. Example of CSS and JavaScript: body { overflow: hidden; -ms-scroll-limit: 0 0 0 0; }

overflow-x: hidden is breaking jquery scroll event

由 若如初见. 提交于 2019-12-01 02:37:26
I am having an issue where setting overflow-x: hidden on the html and body elements is preventing the jquery scroll event from firing. CSS: html, body { overflow-x: hidden; } JS: $(function(){ $(window).on("scroll", function(e){ console.log("scrolling"); }); }); http://jsfiddle.net/r7Fqq/6/ Try it for yourself: Comment out overflow-x: hidden and pop open your console. You should see "scrolling" logged as you scroll up and down the html box. Comment it back in and the scroll event is silent. Does anyone know why this is happening? I'm aware that when you set overflow to hidden it disables

Warning : overflow in implicit constant conversion

由 怎甘沉沦 提交于 2019-12-01 02:35:53
In the following program, the line 5 does give overflow warning as expected, but surprisingly the line 4 doesn't give any warning in GCC: http://www.ideone.com/U0BXn int main() { int i = 256; char c1 = i; //line 4 char c2 = 256; //line 5 return 0; } I was thinking both lines should give overflow warning. Or is there something I'm missing? The topic which led me to do this experiment is this: typedef type checking? There I said the following(which I deleted from my answer, because when I run it, it didn't show up as I had expected): //However, you'll get warning for this case: typedef int T1;

How to prevent hidden element to be shown when focused in Chrome?

由 我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-11-30 22:18:39
I have a strange problem today, in Chrome, when I focus on an element that is absolutely positioned out of its overflow hidden container, it gets visible in Chrome browser (Mac). I've made a fiddle to illustrate the problem : http://jsfiddle.net/GHgtc/ Html <div id="container"> <a id="inner-button" href="#">You can see me !</a> </div> Css #container{ display: block; background: blue; width: 200px; height: 30px; position: relative; overflow: hidden; } #inner-button{ display: block; background: red; width: 20px; height: 20px; position: absolute; top: 5px; right: -20px; } Thanks for your help !

C integer overflow behaviour when assigning to larger-width integers

由 天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-11-30 20:35:49
If I execute the following code in C: #include <stdint.h> uint16_t a = 4000; uint16_t b = 8000; int32_t c = a - b; printf("%d", c); It correctly prints '-4000' as the result. However, I'm a little confused: shouldn't there be an arithmetic overflow when subtracting a larger unsigned integer from the other? What casting rules are at play here? This question seems a bit noobish, so any references would be greatly appreciated. TrayMan The issue is actually somewhat complicated. Operands of arithmetic expressions are converted using specific rules that you can see in Section 3.2.1.5 of the
订阅 overflow