osgi

I am trying to use OSGi and maven to develop an standard alone application. I have the following osgi dependency in pom.xml <dependency> <groupId>org.osgi</groupId> <artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId> <version>6.0.0</version> </dependency> I tried the following code import org.osgi.framework.launch.FrameworkFactory; FrameworkFactory frameworkFactory = ServiceLoader.load(FrameworkFactory.class).iterator().next(); and got this error message Exception in thread "main" java.util.ServiceConfigurationError: org.osgi.framework.launch.FrameworkFactory: Provider org.osgi.framework.launch

It's really not funny. There is no information in internet how to run weld-osgi second version (2.1.2.final) in se app. Instructions for ver 1 don't work. Let the developers be ashamed that they didn't provide necessary samples. I wrote them here . So, I have and OSGi activator and I want to get beans from it. In GF4 I used this: private BeanManager getBeanManager() throws NamingException { try{ InitialContext initialContext = new InitialContext(); return (BeanManager) initialContext.lookup("java:comp/BeanManager"); } catch (NamingException e) { System.out.println("Couldn't get BeanManager

I have put a few jars on my Bundle-Classpath. The line below shows the entry in my pom.xml, which uses the Felix plugin to create the manigest.mf for the bundle. <Bundle-ClassPath>.,lib/com.springsource.org.h2-1.0.71.jar,lib/com.springsource.org.apache.lucene-2.3.2.jar,lib/com.springsource.org.apache.lucene.search-2.3.2.jar</Bundle-ClassPath> These jars have classes which import packages, but from what I can see, they all have a MANIFEST.MF, which has it's own (accurate) list of Import-Package statements. However, when I build my project (using Maven and the bundle plugin), it reports an error

How to convert plugin.xml file to manifest.mf file as some tags like: <runtime> <library name="aaa.jar"> <export name="*"/> </library> <runtime> are seems to be ignored. Here is some correspondence in the next document, but far from complete reference. http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/platform-core/runtime/adoption.html Open the file in the plugin.xml editor. On the Overview Tab>Plug-in Content section there should be a link, " ..., create an OSGi manifest " The OSGi manifest is a set of headers describing the bundle, the bundles or packages that are dependencies, and the packages this bundle

1、官网下载 http://felix.apache.org/downloads.cgi ， 当前最新版本6.0.3 运行felix窗口有两种方式 (1) 可以直接下载发布版本 Felix Framework Distribution（ org.apache.felix.main.distribution-6.0.3.zip ） 解压后目录 进入项目目录，命令行下执行 java -jar ./bin/felix.jar felix.jar 默认会在当前运行目录的 bundle 文件夹内加载启动所需的插件jar，config 目录下的 config.propeties 和 system.properties 里面加载环境变量，如果将其他目录作为启动根目录，该目录下不存在 felix 启动所需信息，启动就会有问题。项目第一次启动的时候会在启动目录下创建一个felix-cache的目录，用于存放框架运行过程产生的数据，当然该目录可以在启动的时候配置，使用 java -jar ./bin/felix.jar <felix-dir> 即可。 (2) 源码导入eclipse运行 下载子项目 Main （ org.apache.felix.main-6.0.3-project.zip ） 解压org.apache.felix.main-6.0.3-project.zip，进入目录，命令行下

I'm trying to start a Wicket Application using Felix implementation of OSGi HTTP service, for that I just register the service using WicketServlet with applicationClassName parameter: props.put("applicationClassName", MainApplication.class.getName()); service = (HttpService)context.getService(httpReference); service.registerServlet("/", new WicketServlet(), props, null); I have also tried using Felix Whiteboard implementation and registering the web service as a Servlet one: props.put("alias", "/"); props.put("init.applicationClassName", MainApplication.class.getName()); registration = context

I'm wondering if it's possible to get Android permission dynamically without using AndroidManifest just with some codes, because I've some OSGi bundles running on Android and without Android permission they are restricted in functionality. Thanks for your answers, yes it complicates the user experience and it's also dangerous for the user if that mechanism is provided No this is not possible. You can't alter the contents of an already installed APK. It would be very dangerous to allow such a behavior anyway as the whole permissions system is meant to allow the user to first read what