network-protocols

When using HTTP/1.1 Pipelining what does the standard say about issuing multiple requests without waiting for each request to complete? What do servers do in practice? I ask because I once tried writing a client which would issue a batch of GET requests for multiple files and remember getting errors. I wasn't sure if it was due to me incorrectly issuing the GET 's or needing to wait for each individual request to finish before issuing the next GET . Pipelining is just that -- having more than one request "in flight" on a single connection. On the open Internet, pipelining isn't very common,

I have written two pair of codes( server.c and client.c ) in Linux. One for UNIX-domain AF_UNIX other for INTERNET-domain AF_INET . Both are working fine! listen() is called for backlog queue length = 3 in both servers listen(sockfd, 3); In UNIX domain (AF_UNIX): While one client is connected with server, If I try to connect more clients to server. Three are kept in queue, and request of fourth is declined. (as I desired - 3 in waiting queue). In INTERNET domain (AF_INET): Request of more than three are kept in a pending queue. Why isn't a request from a fourth client rejected, even when the

I have read that pairing is a must before communicating anything over bluetooth, but I want to know, Can I create an application which would read a text which is broadcasted by another bluetooth App without being paired. Because we can see the names of other bluetooth devices around a device. So can't we set our bluetooth radio to a state that it would read any bluetooth boradcasting text message. Example: there is createInsecureRfcommSocketToServiceRecord() & listenUsingInsecureRfcommWithServiceRecord() in android but aren't there such in C# for windows? Thanks My Ultimate Goal :-) is

Is it possible to import a Python module from over the internet using the http ( s ), ftp , smb or any other protocol? If so, how? If not, why? I guess it's about making Python use more the one protocol(reading the filesystem) and enabling it to use others as well. Yes I agree it would be many folds slower, but some optimization and larger future bandwidths would certainly balance it out. E.g.: import site site.addsitedir("https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/src/e8167548429b9d4937caaa09740ffe9bdab1ef61/lib") import sqlalchemy import sqlalchemy.engine In principle, yes, but all of the tools

I need to write a packet sniffer in Linux that detects HTTPS packet that are sent and save the url from the request. I found code for this in security-freak and ran it. This code runs and only sniffs the received packet but I need to get the sent packet in the sniffer. How do I get the sent packet in this code? I can't use any library like libcap (forbidden). The code is : sniffer.c You should be using ETH_P_ALL instead of ETH_P_IP as the protocol. ETH_P_IP only listens for incoming IP packets. Why can't you use any library? Homework? It's hard to answer without having examples from your code,

What are the best SNMP libraries to use with .NET? Specifically for listening for traps or sending set or get requests. I am using the Sharp SNMP Suite (#SNMP) : LGPL, Mono compatible, developed in C# 3.0, has very good API. Hi as the author of #SNMP, I try my best to be unbiased here :) I have a blog post here which is a simple evaluation report. http://www.lextm.com/index.php/2007/12/product-review-snmp-libraries-for-net-evaluation-report/ In my opinion, PowerSNMP is the leading one which has both complete feature set and simple/natural API. There are many commercial and open source products

I created couple experiments: Setup 1: I created a TCP Sender app and a TCP Receiver app. For this experiment, I started the TCP Sender on an iOS device and the TCP Receiver on another iOS device. And then both are verified to have made connection and sending and received data. I then put the TCP Receiver app into background. The TCP Sender app indicated lost of connection and crashed (yes, I intended that way). Setup 2: I created a UDP Sender app and a UDP Receiver app. Same as above, I started the UDP Sender app on an iOS device and the UDP Receiver app on another iOS device. On the UDP