naming-conventions

Protected properties prefixed with underscores

て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2019-12-07 00:39:24
问题 Like: public $foo = null, $bar = 10; protected $_stuff = null, $_moreStuff = 5; A lot of people seem to do this. Why? Isn't this inconsistent naming (like some PHP functions are :))? 回答1: It really comes down to one thing: personal preference. I, personally, am also one who uses that naming convention. Prefixing anything that is protected or private with an underscore, be it a variable or a function, lets myself and any other programmer who I regularly work with know that that variable is

C# delegates, reference resolution time

混江龙づ霸主 提交于 2019-12-07 00:35:12
问题 I have a simple question about .net delegates. Say I have something like this: public void Invoke(Action<T> action) { Invoke(() => action(this.Value)); } public void Invoke(Action action) { m_TaskQueue.Enqueue(action); } The first function encloses a reference to this.Value . During runtime, when the first, method with generic parameter gets called, it will provide this.Value somehow to the second one, but how? These came into my mind: Call by value (struct) - the current value of this.Value

Fluent NHibernate primary key constraint naming conventions

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2019-12-06 18:29:47
问题 Is there any way to create a naming convention for my primary key constraints in Fluent NHibernate? I know you can name foreign key constraints, but it does not appear possible to name the primary key constraint. 回答1: James Gregory from FNH says... No, that's not supported through NHibernate, so we can't support it either. http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate/browse_thread/thread/9ea7155407d33772 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1358043/fluent-nhibernate-primary-key

Project organization and naming conventions

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-06 16:56:38
This is somewhat a follow-up to Repeating module name for each module component question. We've decided to follow the suggested in Best Practice Recommendations for Angular App Structure blog post angular project organization and naming conventions while building a small internal application for measuring connection quality. And this is what we've got at the moment: $ tree -L 1 . ├── app-config-service.js ├── app-config-service_test.js ├── app-connection-service.js ├── app-connection-service_test.js ├── app-controller.js ├── app-controller_test.js ├── app-countdown-directive.js ├── app

Java add() method convention

匆匆过客 提交于 2019-12-06 15:42:22
So, I'm normally a ruby programmer, so my grasp of Java conventions is shaky at best. If I have a class A and want to define a method to add two instances of that class, what's the convention on the behaviour and return type? public class A { //... public NotSureWhatTypeItShouldReturn add (A that) { /* ... */ } Should I return a boolean indicating success and modify the target, or return a modified copy of the target and throw an exception on error Which fits with the normal Java convention for this kind of method? Everyone here is thinking about Collections.add()-type method; but I doubt that

ExecutorService naming conventions Java

匆匆过客 提交于 2019-12-06 15:32:39
I have recently found myself using some ExecutorServices (SingleThreadScheduledExecutor and newFixedThreadPool) but I don't have any kind of good name for them. Are there any kind of guidelines or conventions about naming these kinds of objects? I have seen names like "workerThread" used for SingleThreadScheduledExecutors, is this correct as they are not exactly threads? Although this is primarily opinion based, I'm using the following conventions in my code: A Field or parameter that references an Executor or an ExecutorService is named executor or executorService . The type of the executor

How can I reduce my Class Name in Zend to call it from any where in application?

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-12-06 14:46:43
I want to follow Zend file naming convention . I have Object.php file with a class and a function in it. MyZendProject->application->models->Test->Object.php class Model_Test_Object { public function test() { echo "Test"; } } Now I want to access above test function in following file but it is not finding it. MyZendProject->application->modules->test->controllers->TestController.php $testModel = new Model_Test_Object(); $testModel->test(); But when I name the class Application_Model_Test_Object in Object.php and call it in TestController like this then it works. $testModel = new Application

Naming conventions for model in multi layer application

天涯浪子 提交于 2019-12-06 14:40:03
I'm a new developer I have never worked in big enterprise company so I have a question about naming conventions in multi-layer application. I have a WPF/MVVM application, with EF data layer. I also want to adjust DDD principles. So, I three models of the same class I would say. I have "model" in MVVM, I have a entity/dto(I don't know?) in EF, I have domain model/POCO in DDD. I have to create all those 3 classes to separate concerns (maybe I could merge MVVM model with POCO. I mean, POCO is kinda model in MVVM). How should I name them? Let's say I have Person POCO. Should it be "Person" or

G++ compiler cannot distinguish variable and function with the same name? [duplicate]

一曲冷凌霜 提交于 2019-12-06 07:10:54
This question already has answers here : Closed 7 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Class method and variable with same name, compile error in C++ not in Java? The G++ compiler would complain when my class member name and member function name are the same. It seems that whenever a variable name happens to be the same as a function name, the compiler would complain. In Java, it is not the case. I just wonder why the G++ compiler cannot distinguish a variable name from a function name since the function name always comes with a pair of parenthesis. struct Callable { void operator()() const { } };

MVC model binding naming convention for child objects?

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-12-06 05:33:12
问题 I'm having trouble with default model binding naming convention when there is a child property. For example: I have a ViewModel which looks something like this: public class UserViewModel { public User BusinessObject { get; set; } } My User class has a property called "NetworkLogin" My View has something like this: <%: Html.LabelFor(model => model.BusinessObject.NetworkLogin)%> <%: Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.BusinessObject.NetworkLogin)%> Auto-Fill And my controller, what I'd like to do,