multi-tenant | 易学教程

How can I create and manage a multi-tenant ASP MVC application

阅读更多关于 How can I create and manage a multi-tenant ASP MVC application

I want to create a multi-tenant application that uses the hostname to determine the customer. For example: CustomerOne.myapp.com AnotherCo.myapp.com AndOneMore.myapp.com ... I can do the database and security side with no problems, I can also get the hostname from the URL, but what I am struggling to find out is how to create the basic plumbing that would allow a new customer to sign up online, provide their company name, and for the application to create the new URL, ready to be used straight away. Can anyone help? Thanks, Rob. codeulike I can't answer this exactly, but I can break it down a

Most painless multi-tenancy implementation using ASP.NET, NHibernate / Fluent NHibernate

阅读更多关于 Most painless multi-tenancy implementation using ASP.NET, NHibernate / Fluent NHibernate

I'm trying to implement multi-tenancy in an ASP.NET MVC application I have, that uses NHibernate. Though I have control over the database for multi-tenancy. I'm trying to figure out the best way to filter our database queries using NHibernate. I would like to know if there is a painless way where I can append a condition (something like WHERE InstanceID = 1 ) to every CRUD query to the DB using NHibernate. I looked at global filters. But I wasn't sure if I'm using it the right way. I tried something like this. NHibernateSession.GetDefaultSessionFactory().GetCurrentSession() .EnableFilter(

Dynamic middleware for laravel 5

阅读更多关于 Dynamic middleware for laravel 5

问题 While building multi-tenancy packages for Laravel 5 I had to find out how to add middleware dynamically from code. In comparison to this question on SO I do not want to touch the Http/Kernel definitions. During application initialization I check whether the requested hostname is known in the database and whether this hostname requires a redirect to a primary hostname or ssl. Because you don't want to touch the Http/Kernel as a package, we need to use the service provider. Requirements:

MultiTenancy with Hibernate 4.0 with Separate Schema approach

阅读更多关于 MultiTenancy with Hibernate 4.0 with Separate Schema approach

问题 I am using EJB 3.0 and Hibernate 4 with PostgreSQL as my database server to create a multitenant system where each tenant will have separate but identical schema. I am still in the trial stage where I have 3 schemes public , company1 , company2 all having a single table person. Now what i want to do is change the schema in runtime as per the user so that he can view the data of his/her company only. Here is my sample code: Entity Object: package com.neebal.domain; import java.io.Serializable;

Multi-tenancy: Individual database per tenant

阅读更多关于 Multi-tenancy: Individual database per tenant

We are developing a multi-tenant application. With respect to architecture, we have designed shared middle tier for business logic and one database per tenant for data persistence. Saying that, business tier will establish set of connections (connection pool) with the database server per tenant. That means application maintain separate connection-pool for each tenant. If we expect around 5000 tenants, then this solution needs high resource utilization (connections between app server and database server per tenant), that leads to performance issue. We have resolved that by keeping common

Multi tenancy in Shiro

阅读更多关于 Multi tenancy in Shiro

问题 We are evaluating Shiro for a custom Saas app that we are building. Seems like a great framework does does 90% of what we want, out of the box. My understanding of Shiro is basic, and here is what I am trying to accomplish. We have multiple clients, each with an identical database All authorization (Roles/Permissions) will be configured by the clients within their own dedicated database Each client will have a unique Virtual host eg. client1.mycompany.com, client2.mycompany.com etc Scenario 1

Multi-Tenant Authentication with AWS Cognito

阅读更多关于 Multi-Tenant Authentication with AWS Cognito

问题 My current project is in AWS, using Cognito and microservices with Lambda. We have designed the microservices using DDD and are in the process of implementing basic functionality. However, there is a business need for users of the API to be able to be categorised into the client company that they work for, and only be able to access data for that client company as well as any role-based authentication we will have. This isn't a full multi-tenant solution as every user will be working with the

Multi tenancy support in Java EE 6

阅读更多关于 Multi tenancy support in Java EE 6

I have an existing Java EE 6 application (deployed in Glassfish v 3.1) and want to support multiple tenants. Technologies/APIs I'm currently using in my app are EJB (including the EJB timer service) JPA 2.0 (EclipseLink) JSF 2.0 JMS JAX-RS I plan to use CDI as well As far as I know, adding multi-tenancy support affects only the persistence layer. My question: Has anybody done this before? What are the steps to convert the application? Will this affect other layers other than persistence? There will be a high number of tenants, therefore, all data will reside in the same DB schema. Damo

Mongoose create connection for multi-tenancy support in node.js

阅读更多关于 Mongoose create connection for multi-tenancy support in node.js

问题 I'm researching a good way to implement multiple database for multi-tenant support using node.js + mongoose and mongodb. I've found out that mongoose supports a method called createConnection() and I'm wondering the best practice to use that. Actually I am storing all of those connection in an array, separated by tenant. It'd be like: var connections = [ { tenant: 'TenantA', connection: mongoose.createConnection('tenant-a') }, { tenant: 'TenantB', connection: mongoose.createConnection('tenant

one database per client or all clients in one database. which one should I use for a online application?

阅读更多关于 one database per client or all clients in one database. which one should I use for a online application?

问题 So I have this application that would have multiple modules, from project management to accounting modules. The question is should I have one database per client (company) or one database that holds everything ? 1) which one would be better performance wise? 2) is is going to be a lot harder to manage multiple databases or is these manageable. 3) We are going to have the same application for all users, meaning that the same schema is going to be used no matter the number of databases. 4) some