multi-tenant

What is the best way to achieve multi-tenancy in neo4j? I have seen Tinkerpop and Spring Data. I'm have multiple clients and I would like to store client info in its own database to ensure security. I do not want to use labels or indexes to solve this problem. stephen mallette You mention that you've "seen TinkerPop" but I couldn't tell if that meant you've seen it, considered it and dismissed it as a solution here, so apologies if that is the case and I'm not answering your question. I've successfully used PartitionStrategy (formerly PartitionGraph ) from TinkerPop to achieve multi-tenancy in

I have a database used by several clients. I don't really want surrogate incremental key values to bleed between clients. I want the numbering to start from 1 and be client specific. I'll use a two-part composite key of the tenant_id as well as an incremental id. What is the best way to create an incremental key per tenant? I am using SQL Server Azure. I'm concerned about locking tables, duplicate keys, etc. I'd typically set the primary key to IDENTITY and move on. Thanks Tim Lentine Are you planning on using SQL Azure Federations in the future? If so, the current version of SQL Azure

I am currently using an older version of Umbraco (4.03) and I have several basic sites (mostly 1 pagers) running under the same IIS Application. I have a shared hosting account with Winhost.com, which doesn't offer multiple site application roots, just domain pointers, so I'm limited to a single CMS installation that supports multi-tenancy. The Umbraco multi-tenancy setup is a bit hacky and I really need to upgrade. It seems that Orchard is more focused on multi-tenancy support. My Umbraco installation has some issues with shared skins, which has always been a little annoying. So, the basic

Is it possible to start up and shut down multiple H2 databases within a JVM? My goal is to support multi-tenancy by giving each user/account their own database. Each account has very little data. Data between the accounts is never accessed together, compared, or grouped; each account is entirely separate from the others. Each account is only accessed briefly once a day or a few times a month. So there are few upsides to housing the data together in a single database, and some serious downsides. So my idea is that when a user logs in for a particular account, that account’s database is loaded.

Hello I'm developing a web application using Vaadin framework, JPA EclipseLink as ORM, MYSQL as database. Currently I'm working to implement Multitenant structure for my app. Here I've to choose TABLE_PER_TENANT with different schema in a shared database strategy as I already have some tenants. Here is an example of my tenant specific entity: @Entity @Multitenant(MultitenantType.TABLE_PER_TENANT) @TenantTableDiscriminator(type = TenantTableDiscriminatorType.SCHEMA, contextProperty = PersistenceUnitProperties.MULTITENANT_PROPERTY_DEFAULT) public class UserAccount implements Serializable { .....

In web.php I've switched Postgres schemas in middleware as the subdomain type of HTTP request is made. This way: Route::group( [ 'domain' => '{tenant}.' . config('app.url'), 'middleware' => 'select-schema' ], function () { $this->get('/', 'HomeController@index')->middleware('auth'); } ); In select-schema middleware, I do something like this. This works correctly. (don't worry) DB::select('SET search_path TO ' . {tenant}); My main problem is that: I've different migrations for public schema and for any individual tenant . In individual tenant I have users table. As soon I'm logged in it pop up

While building multi-tenancy packages for Laravel 5 I had to find out how to make the paths and namespaces dynamic. This would involve: views; adding a template directory dynamically that is available in the root namespace lang; adding a language directory dynamically that is available in the root namespace routes; adding a routes file dynamically config; merging additional configuration files from a dynamic location vendor; allowing custom vendors and packages to be available from a dynamic location views Using a service provider you can use the following in your boot() method for views to be