multi-tenant

问题 I am trying to create a multitenant Azure website which is a way for people to sign up and get their sub-domains. I have followed the instructions in here (http://www.stratospher.es/blog/post/wildcard-subdomains-in-windows-azure) and manage to get all *.mydomain.com CNAME to mydomain.azurewebsites.net according to (http://www.digwebinterface.com/) Here is the problem if I go to tenant1.mydomain.com I'll get the 404 server error. However if I log in to Azure and go to my website Manage custom

问题 I have a database used by several clients. I don't really want surrogate incremental key values to bleed between clients. I want the numbering to start from 1 and be client specific. I'll use a two-part composite key of the tenant_id as well as an incremental id. What is the best way to create an incremental key per tenant? I am using SQL Server Azure. I'm concerned about locking tables, duplicate keys, etc. I'd typically set the primary key to IDENTITY and move on. Thanks 回答1: Are you

问题 I am currently using an older version of Umbraco (4.03) and I have several basic sites (mostly 1 pagers) running under the same IIS Application. I have a shared hosting account with Winhost.com, which doesn't offer multiple site application roots, just domain pointers, so I'm limited to a single CMS installation that supports multi-tenancy. The Umbraco multi-tenancy setup is a bit hacky and I really need to upgrade. It seems that Orchard is more focused on multi-tenancy support. My Umbraco

问题 In web.php I've switched Postgres schemas in middleware as the subdomain type of HTTP request is made. This way: Route::group( [ 'domain' => '{tenant}.' . config('app.url'), 'middleware' => 'select-schema' ], function () { $this->get('/', 'HomeController@index')->middleware('auth'); } ); In select-schema middleware, I do something like this. This works correctly. (don't worry) DB::select('SET search_path TO ' . {tenant}); My main problem is that: I've different migrations for public schema

问题 I have multiple SQL Server databases (same schema) for different customers. They will be sharing a common ASP.NET web application. If one of these customers wants a customized version of a web page, we will create a new one in his directory (or project). Example: /Main Application/WebPage.aspx /Main Application/WebPage2.aspx /Main Application/Customer 1/WebPage.aspx /Main Application/Customer 2/WebPage.aspx At the moment, I have the following project structure Solution (Main application) ASP

问题 I am migrating my multitenant application from Webapi to aspnet core. In webapi version I was using TenantIdentificationStrategy that identified tenants based on request path on HttpContext . Moving to aspnet core, I am able to wire-up autofac successfully. I am not able to figure out how to wireup the tenant strategy. I tried injecting IHttpContextAccessor in ConfigureServices as services.AddSingleton<IHttpContextAccessor, HttpContextAccessor>(); and my strategy looks like this public class

问题 I want to implement DISCRIMINATOR based Multi-Tenancy solution for Shared Schema Based Multi-Tenancy Model -common database schema for all tenants. Technology stack Hibernate 3 Global filter (I can't use EclipseLink) Spring Data JPA - I want this because we are already using this one and we cant change it. My questions are How to achieve this : Spring Data JPA has no any support for GLOBAL filter so I need to add customize Spring Data JPA repository which can in-turn apply global filter for

问题 I'm trying to implement multi-tenancy architecture in my project. I am referring "http://anakiou.blogspot.com/2015/08/multi-tenant-application-with-spring.html" example. Everything is working fine in this example. But problem in this example is whenever new datasource to be add then we should add it manually. But i want something like adding datasource dynamically without application restart. This is my application.properties spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=none spring.thymeleaf.cache=false

问题 I am organizing a multi tenant application with a single code base/application using subdomains to detect the tenant, then runs a SET SCHEMA on postgres to do the fun stuff. My issue is that certain clients will require various levels of customization to the main codebase. Not a ton, but certainly enough to the point that I wouldn't want to start hacking the main models and controllers by adding a bunch of if statements. Overriding views is easy enough with views load paths... but my question

问题 My company holds a dozen websites and isolated DBs (identical schemas). every customer has its own website (different app pool) and DB. every website has its own configuration, several connection strings, but they all have same schema for configuration. cust1.domain.com cust2.domain.com cust3.domain.com We would like to merge all websites to one (single app pool) and stay with isolated DBs for security and large amount of data reasons. what is the best practice for designing a DAL and