model-view-controller

问题 Good day. I got a spring mvc application and 2 controllers inside. First controller (PublicController) can process requests from all users, Second (PrivateController) can only process authorized users. So I implemented two Handler Interceptor`s @Configuration @EnableWebMvc @ComponentScan(basePackages="webapp.base.package") public class WebApplicationConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter { @Override public void addInterceptors(InterceptorRegistry registry) { registry.addInterceptor(new

问题 Is there anything that is different or more powerful with a traditional controller over an express route? If you have an express app and define models, does it become an MVC application, or is there more necessary? I'm just wondering if I'm missing out on extra/easier functionality in my node express apps by not upgrading to a more legitimate 'controller'. If there is such a thing. Thanks! Edit: To clarify, if you use a route like so: // routes/index.js exports.module = function(req, res) { /

问题 Is there anything that is different or more powerful with a traditional controller over an express route? If you have an express app and define models, does it become an MVC application, or is there more necessary? I'm just wondering if I'm missing out on extra/easier functionality in my node express apps by not upgrading to a more legitimate 'controller'. If there is such a thing. Thanks! Edit: To clarify, if you use a route like so: // routes/index.js exports.module = function(req, res) { /

问题 Is there anything that is different or more powerful with a traditional controller over an express route? If you have an express app and define models, does it become an MVC application, or is there more necessary? I'm just wondering if I'm missing out on extra/easier functionality in my node express apps by not upgrading to a more legitimate 'controller'. If there is such a thing. Thanks! Edit: To clarify, if you use a route like so: // routes/index.js exports.module = function(req, res) { /

问题 What is the proper way to start the application that needs 5-10 seconds to retrieve initial data from the database? This is what I got so far but I am not sure that there are no better ways. I would like that GUI and database access would be in different threads so that GUI building would occur concurrently with data retrieval. public static void main(String[] args) { final Controller controller = new Controller(); SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() { public void run() { View frame =

问题 I have made a website with a page that includes a razor form. The user can login on this form and then redirects to a different page. The logging in (and logging out) works with formsauthentication succesfully. However, I can't seem to use HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name to retrieve the stored username (in the formsauthentication cookie). It returns an empty string "". I am using MVC 5 and ASP 4.5 with no standard membership or role providers. Login: [HttpPost] public ActionResult

问题 I have an mvc form with multiple submit buttons - 'Save Draft' and 'Publish'. The objective is to skip both client side(javascript/unobstructive) validation and server side validation when the 'Save Draft' button is clicked and the form is submitted. But I do need to trigger both validation if the 'Publish' button is clicked. My research has led me to few solutions. Client Side -By writing a jquery plugin (function ($) { $.fn.turnOffValidation = function (form) { var settings = form.validate(

问题 I'm loving JavaFX and SceneBuilder, but I just can't figure out how to make SceneBuilder link my FXML views with their Java controllers when they are not in the same folder. I'd just like to have this folder structure: package |-- model |-- view | |--someElementView.fxml | \--anotherElementView.fxml \-- control |--someElementController.java \--anotherElementController.java Instead I can only make SceneBuilder recognise my controllers if I have this folder structure which I'd like to avoid:

问题 I'm using the OutputCache attribute to cache my action's html output at the server-side. Fine, it works, but now I have a situation where the content changes rarely, but when it does, it's critical for the user to see the new data the very next request. So, is there a way to abort the page cache duration programmatically? 回答1: Yes, it is possible using HttpResponse.RemoveOutputCacheItem Method. Check this question: SO - How to programmatically clear outputcache for controller action method

问题 I want to know which php architecture strategies developers use in complex php applications . So far , i know the mvc structure which consists of models, views and controller (and controller plugins which handle with common tasks such as user access controller ). I know some good php frameworks which makes some common stuffs easier .But the problem starts when i thing about huge and complex php applications . because in these applications there are lots of stuff to do or lots of think to