mercurial

问题 We are using a Subversion server at my job for source control. I was thinking that rather than keeping up with my own branch, I would run Mercurial on my workstation, commit locally, and then commit to the Subversion trunk whenever I’m done with whatever feature I’m working on. From my understanding of DVCS this is theoretically possible. Can anyone offer reference to any tutorials on this specific type of integration, or point to any tools that will make such a process as seamless as

问题 I mean something like "hg serve", with HTTP push support. This is probably not supported out of the box due GAE's read-only file system. If you know of any attempts to do it or analysis of what it would take, please share. 回答1: For the sake of closure. Yes, someone did this. Mercurial on App Engine 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/340102/running-mercurial-server-on-google-appengine

问题 I have a commit onto which I have amended some files. Some of these files that were part of the amend I do not want in this commit. Is there a way in Mercurial to remove certain files from the commit without losing the changes I have made to them? Thank you. Steps: Made some changes hg commit -m Made some more changes (some of these file accidentally amended) hg amend 回答1: Try out: hg forget somefile.txt hg commit --amend If the file was new (i.e. you had used hg add). If that file already

问题 I've been reading about hg bisect and its interesting to be able to know which revision introduced a bug, but I'd like to know what people use this information for. The only thing I can think of is trying to narrow down which dates might need a data fix if it's a bug that results in some form of invalid data. update: I think I completely misunderstood the purpose before I posted this. I was thinking that I would do the debugging and find which line(s) introduced the bug and then use bisect.

问题 Until recently we have been using SVN for all projects of our web studio, and there is a very convenient feature present in several clients like Subversive and TortoiseSVN that can extract all files that have been changed in a certain revision. Is there a way to do it in Mercurial? I don't care if it's done via a GUI or a command line, it's just very convenient to have a set of files that have been changed in a certain changeset. P.S. I must have put it wrong the first time. I need more than

问题 I'm searching for info to setup a Mercurial Server for Windows (7 or XP) with an Apache (xampp if it is useful to know it) with the Push Model, just like in this question but my team is composed of 5 to 8 (unsolvent) guys who are each one working in separated places, so I don't think the bitbucket solution or anyother non-private repo out there. I think this post would do the trick, but i haven't experienced anything with cgi before, Has anybody done this before? where can I find a more

问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 9 years ago . Possible Duplicates: Why is git better than Subversion? I've already read a lot (not enough to get the perfect picture though) about versioning systems, and the obvious conclusion is that GIT is simply the best. Or Bazaar maybe. Or Mercurial. But if so it was, then nobody would be using SVN, but they still do. Why? I myself have no own opinion on what v.c.s. is generally the best yet because of lack of experience with them. Could

问题 I've 3 repos, A, B and C, all related to the same project. A is the oldest version of the project, B is an experiment that didn't really go anywhere and C is the latest working version. All these repos have different files - they're different implementations of the same product. I'd like to merge these 3 repos into one keeping their history - this is vital. I guess I want to stack B on top of A and C on top of B but when I checkout the project I only want to get the changes related to repo C.

问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 6 years ago . I've just joined a new company and at the moment we're using Microsoft SourceSafe as our repository. The settings aren't ideal and it

问题 I've 3 repos, A, B and C, all related to the same project. A is the oldest version of the project, B is an experiment that didn't really go anywhere and C is the latest working version. All these repos have different files - they're different implementations of the same product. I'd like to merge these 3 repos into one keeping their history - this is vital. I guess I want to stack B on top of A and C on top of B but when I checkout the project I only want to get the changes related to repo C.