md5

What's faster/better to use: the MySQL or PHP md5 function?

久未见 提交于 2019-12-05 13:34:43
问题 I checked the passwords for the users against the DB. What is faster, the MySQL MD5 function ... pwd = MD5('.$pwd.') OR the PHP MD5 function ... pwd = '.md5($pwd).' What is the right way between the two options? 回答1: If your application is only calcullating md5 when someone registers on your site, or is logging in, own many calls to md5 will you do per hour ? Couple of hundreds ? If so, I don't think the really small difference between PHP and MySQL will be significant at all. The question

Generate An MD5 Hash of An Image Using HTML5 / JavaScript

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-12-05 13:16:50
Using the HTML5 File API and any JavaScript crypto library, how can I generate an MD5 hash of the file? To read the file: var reader = new FileReader(); reader.onload = function(e) { var contents = e.target.result; // What goes here? }; reader.readAsBinaryString(data.files[0]); This goes there: var reader = new FileReader(); reader.onload = function(e) { var contents = e.target.result; // This goes here: var hash = CryptoJS.MD5(CryptoJS.enc.Latin1.parse(contents)); }; Be sure you include the CryptoJS library: <script src="http://crypto-js.googlecode.com/svn/tags/3.1.2/build/rollups/md5.js"><

Changing the hashing function on a pre-existing database

て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2019-12-05 11:11:05
I'm doing a bit of reading on hashing for passwords. I've seen that SHA-256 > MD5. This got me thinking about how an app may deal with changing from one hashing function to another. What happens if someone implements an app that hashes their passwords using MD5. They then decide that SHA-256 is the way to go. But of course the password hashes stored in the database are in MD5. What is the process for migrating the data in the database from one hashing function to another? Thomas Pornin It is not possible to "unhash" passwords (at least not in a general, efficient and reliable way -- you can

How to get md5 iterated md5 sum of every chunk, using blueimp jquery upload plugin

99封情书 提交于 2019-12-05 08:41:26
问题 I need to calculate and send an iterated md5-hash to my upload-api. But I don't know how. I´m using the tutorial found here: http://tutorialzine.com/2013/05/mini-ajax-file-upload-form/ Along with the blueimp jquery upload plugin. For sending only ONE FILE (file size smaller than chunk size), everything is working fine. But if a file is chunked, then I have no idea, how to catch the chunk to get md5 of it. At the end I have to make the md5 iteratively like described here: https://code.google

Will md5(file_contents_as_string) equal md5_file(/path/to/file)?

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-12-05 08:34:54
问题 If I do: <?php echo md5(file_get_contents("/path/to/file")) ?> ...will this always produce the same hash as: <?php echo md5_file("/path/to/file") ?> 回答1: Yes they return the same: var_dump(md5(file_get_contents(__FILE__))); var_dump(md5_file(__FILE__)); which returns this in my case: string(32) "4d2aec3ae83694513cb9bde0617deeea" string(32) "4d2aec3ae83694513cb9bde0617deeea" Edit: Take a look at the source code of both functions: https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/ext/standard/md5.c

How to detect whether two files are identical in Python

我的梦境 提交于 2019-12-05 08:14:37
Is making system call to "md5sum file1" and "md5sum file2" and compare two return values enough in this case? Well, that will tell you whether they're definitely different or probably the same. It's possible for two files to have the same hash but not actually have the same data... just very unlikely. In your situation, what is the impact if you get a false positive (i.e. if you think they're the same, but they're not)? MD5 is probably good enough not to worry about collisions if they would only occur accidentally ... but if you've got security (or money) at stake and someone could plant a

AES encryption & security flaw

二次信任 提交于 2019-12-05 08:05:03
问题 Check update#1 This logic is a candidate for a authentication procedure, done by simple HTTP requests: I'm sending: userName + encrypted_userName (encrypted_userName is actually the encrypted result of userName, done using AES & as key i use the md5 hash of the password). NOTE: I'm not sending the md5 hashed Password. on the server I'm comparing: encrypted_userName with own_encrypted_userName (since on server i have access to full info on user, i calculate own encrypted_userName). Question :

is hashing mechanism really secure?

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-12-05 07:54:04
问题 Well, I have always seen (and following) people saying to use hashing mechanism for storing passwords in database. I am really concerned is it secure? Lets go with example. Let's say I am hacker and I got your database name, id and password. Now I have FULL access to your database. What people say passwords should be hashed because if someone hacks, they are visible to hackers. so If I run query as select id, password FROM userDetails I will get data as below Option 1 : Without hash +++++++++

Compute MD5 digest of file in Haskell

那年仲夏 提交于 2019-12-05 06:55:21
Using Haskell, how can I compute the MD5 digest of a file without using external tools like md5sum ? Note: This question intentionally shows no effort as I answered it right away. One option is to use the pureMD5 package, for example if you want to compute the hash of the file foo.txt : import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as LB import Data.Digest.Pure.MD5 main :: IO () main = do fileContent <- LB.readFile "foo.txt" let md5Digest = md5 fileContent print md5Digest This code prints the the same MD5 sum as md5sum foo.txt . If you prefer a one-liner, you can use this one (the imports are the same

Why is md5 still widely used

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-12-05 06:47:49
First, i should say that I am relatively new to programming so please be gentle with me if this is a naive or dumb question. Ok, so I am in the process of writing a small application, part of which will involve hashing user passwords. After researching the best way to do this, md5 appears as a suggestion, almost as many times as it appears in articles criticizing its use. The alternatives are the likes of SHA-1 etc which are stronger and less likely to be cracked. This makes perfect sense. To get to the point: Why is md5 still widely used for hashing Should I automatically discount md5 for