lxc

2.LXC和namespace介绍

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-12-19 06:25:11
lxc介绍 LXC又名Linux container,是一种虚拟化的解决方案,这种是内核级的虚拟化。(主流的解决方案Xen ,KVM, LXC) Linux Container容器是一种 内核虚拟化技术 ,可以提供轻量级的虚拟化,以便隔离进程和资源。可以最大效率隔离进程和资源。它可以把传统虚拟技术以及后来的Xen、KVM的VM进程像HOST进程一样运行管理, 所以创建和销毁都非常轻。 如果说LXC着眼点在于提供轻量级的虚拟技术,扎根在虚拟机,那Docker则定位于应用。 概述 LXC为Linux Container的简写。可以提供轻量级的虚拟化,以便隔离进程和资源,而且不需要提供指令解释机制以及全虚拟化的其他复杂性。相当于C++中的NameSpace。容器有效地将由单个操作系统管理的资源划分到孤立的组中,以更好地在孤立的组之间平衡有冲突的资源使用需求。与传统虚拟化技术相比,它的优势在于: (1)与宿 主机 使用同一个 内核 ,性能损耗小; (2)不需要指令级模拟; (3)不需要即时(Just-in-time)编译; (4)容器可以在CPU核心的本地 运行指令 ,不需要任何专门的解释机制; (5)避免了准虚拟化和系统调用替换中的复杂性; (6)轻量级隔离,在隔离的同时还提供共享机制,以实现容器与宿主机的资源共享。 总结:Linux Container是一种轻量级的虚拟化的手段。

sudo: effective uid is not 0, is sudo installed setuid root?

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-12-19 05:01:49
问题 I am trying to create deb package from LXC rootfs, and after creating it I want to install that package any computer. Up to this point I achieved packaging and installing deb package, however after installation of LXC package, I cannot be superuser in that lxc. I get this error when I use "sudo" command. sudo: effective uid is not 0, is sudo installed setuid root? thanks in advance. 回答1: I just had this same exact problem on Mac OS after strangely deciding to screw my own system by doing:

Difference between LXC and libcontainer [closed]

梦想与她 提交于 2019-12-18 12:16:24
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 7 months ago . While going through docker docs, I found that docker is now using libcontainer instead of LXC. Has anyone idea about how libcontainer is better ( If so..) than LXC ? 回答1: Linux Containers (LXC) was used before docker 0.9 (On March 13, 2014, with the release of version 0.9, Docker

LXC without chroot

北慕城南 提交于 2019-12-18 11:32:30
问题 Is there any way to use LXC for resource management using process groups without creating containers? I am working on a service that runs arbitrary code inside a sandbox, for which I am only interested in hardware resource management. I don't want any chrooting; I just want these process groups to have access to the main file system. I was told that lxc is light weight, but all the examples that I see create a new container (I.e. a dir with a full OS) for every lxc process. I don't really see

What is the impact of using multiple Base Images in Docker?

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-12-18 10:49:32
问题 I understand that docker containers are portable between docker hosts, but I am confused about the relationship with the Base Image and the host. From the documentation on Images, it appears that you would have a much heavier footprint (akin to multiple VMs) on the host machine if you had a variety of base images running. Is this assumption correct? GOOD : Many containers sharing a single base image. BAD : Many containers running separate/unique base images. I'm sure a lot of this confusion

Get Docker Container CPU Usage as Percentage

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-12-17 23:17:20
问题 Docker provides an interactive stats command, docker stats [cid] which gives up to date information on the CPU usage, like so: CONTAINER CPU % MEM USAGE/LIMIT MEM % NET I/O 36e8a65d 0.03% 4.086 MiB/7.798 GiB 0.05% 281.3 MiB/288.3 MiB I'm trying to get the CPU usage as a percentage in a digestible format to do some analysis. I've seen the stats in /sys/fs which seem to provide similar values as the Docker Remote API which gives me this JSON blob: { "cpu_usage": { "usage_in_usermode":

如何理解LXC与Docker之间的主要区别

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2019-12-17 20:39:55
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 两者的概述 容器技术独立运行并且从主机系统上封装应用程序工作量。把容器想象成可以安装和运行应用程序的主机操作系统里面的操作系统,从实用目的来讲,它就像一个虚拟机。 LXC项目给不同配置和用户空间应用提供最小的容器操作样本来管理容器生命周期, LXC项目的这个特性和Linux内核使模仿机制能够正常启用。 便携性 容器技术将应用从主机操作系统上解耦下来,摘录该程序并且使之在任意支持LXC的系统上都实现轻便化。低调的说法就是:非常好用。用户在这样一个原始和最小库的Linux操作系统上可以在容器里运行任何程序(就像是在容器里运行LAMP堆栈)。 因为应用程序和工作量是相对独立的,所以用户可以运行多版本的语言,比如PHP,Python,Ruby,Apache,这些语言都可以共存,隐藏在容器里。实现云计算,就好比是这些例子和工作量都可以灵活的被移动到别的系统,复制,以及快速配置。 难道虚拟技术就做不到吗? 不不不,虚拟技术也可以做到,但是会有一定程度的性能损失,灵活度也会下降。容器技术不是模仿硬件层次,而是在Linux内核里使用cgroup和namespaces来打造轻便的、将近裸机速度的虚拟技术操作系统环境。因为不是虚拟化存储,所以容器技术不会管底层存储或者文件系统,而是你放哪里,它操作哪里。

Do I need to create multi host network in docker?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-12-13 11:05:07
问题 For the below docker-compose building docker file dynamically: version: '2' volumes: jenkins_home: external: true services: jenkins: build: context: . args: DOCKER_GID: ${DOCKER_GID} DOCKER_ENGINE: ${DOCKER_ENGINE} DOCKER_COMPOSE: ${DOCKER_COMPOSE} volumes: - jenkins_home:/var/jenkins_home - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock ports: - "8080:8080" creates bridge type network ( project1_default ) is created: $ docker network ls NETWORK ID NAME DRIVER SCOPE .... f1b7ca7c6dfe project1

Error creating ubuntu 16 container under arch

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2019-12-13 02:49:35
问题 I am trying to install a Ubuntu container on Archlinux using LXC. I am following this guide:https://gist.github.com/manoj23/8a35849697945896cdaef77927c695a7 After I run this command: lxc-create --name=ubuntu-16 --template=ubuntu -- --release xenial --arch amd64 I get the following error: Bad template: ubuntu Error creating container ubuntu-16 Why is this happening? 回答1: It says in the error. Bad template. You can see that in the current version of lxc there is no ubuntu template. The gist is

how to create multiple bridges of LXC?

寵の児 提交于 2019-12-13 02:03:48
问题 Right now, after installing LXC, you only have one default bridge "lxcbr0" which is used to connect your container to host machine. So through this way, we can create multiple containers and connect them all to the bridge "lxcbr0". My question is: Can I create two bridges "lxcbr0" and "lxcbr1" such that I can divide the multiple containers into two subnetwork, one of which connects to "lxcbr0" and the other one connects to "lxcbr1"? Happy Holidays! Thanks. Deryk 回答1: It's bash code that add