kill

问题 I often find myself repeatedly yanking something after doing some kills and it becomes a process like: C-y C-y M-y C-y M-y M-y C-y M-y M-y M-y Each time I kill some text it pushes the first kill back in the kill ring so that I need to cycle through all the kills to return to text I want to yank. What I want to do is repeatedly yank the same text while killing text in-between yanks. Is this possible? 回答1: This is a strange hack, but may help. The first time you use M-y you normally get an

问题 As far as I can read, Android may kill my process at any time 1. One might interpret the article [1] such that, at any point, a process must be able to survive a crash. How is that handled? Are there any guarantees of any methods being called if a process is killed this way? The article* doesn't mention it. My question is, how do you guarantee that a force-killed process resumes in some sane way on next start? The only state my process has (assuming no guarantees are made for methods being

问题 i am developing a very simple application for nokia mobile.my task is to find what are all the process currently running ? after that i have to kill(exit that application i.e camera or musicplayer) that process! i have tried to find some simple method in Qprocess but there is no function to listout the current process. is there any possible way in NokiaQT or i have to use symbianC++???? 回答1: Qt does not provide an API to do this. You will need to use the appropriate OS API instead. I'm not

问题 I have some c# code which opens a Powerpoint slide, refreshes the graphs, and then quits. This works fine, unless the user already has a Powerpoint slide open, in which case it will close down their existing session (losing any changes they may have made!) once the exe has run. So, the issue is if you have PPT’s open in the background, run my EXE which runs the below code (opening up a template, refreshing some graphs, saving and closing), upon application exit it disposes of the variable

问题 I have a service listening to some events from server. A service has START_STICKY flag that makes him restart when it's killed by OS. When service receive an event i have two scenarios. First, if activity isn't killed i need to send result to local broadcast receiver and update UI. Second, if it's killed by OS i want to recreate it and send data in bundle. But i don't know how to recognize that android killed my activity. onDestroy activity event doesn't come in this situation. @Override

问题 My main process calls an external library method. This method sometimes hangs. I can not fix the external library because another company is responsible for it. I want to use a Thread for the library calls with a defined execution timer. When the method call takes to long, the Thread with the Runnable in which the method call is placed should stop and the main process should go forward. Main Thread wait Execute Thread start Start timer Thread When timer thread is finished kill Execute Thread

问题 I have a thread that opens a form of type MyMessageAlert. This form is a popup window that is opened when I call it. It has a timer which calls a method CloseWindow() after 30 seconds. m_messagAlert = new MyMessageAlert(); ParameterizedThreadStart thStart = new ParameterizedThreadStart(m_messagAlert.setMessage); Thread thread = new Thread(thStart); thread.Start(strMessage); //at this point, the MyMessageAlert form is opened. I have defined a list of type thread: public List<Thread> m

问题 I have a Bash script (Bash 3.2, Mac OS X 10.8) that invokes multiple Python scripts in parallel in order to better utilize multiple cores. Each Python script takes a really long time to complete. The problem is that if I hit Ctrl+C in the middle of the Bash script, the Python scripts do not actually get killed. How can I write the Bash script so that killing it will also kill all its background children? Here's my original "reduced test case". Unfortunately I seem to have reduced it so much

问题 I have a Bash script (Bash 3.2, Mac OS X 10.8) that invokes multiple Python scripts in parallel in order to better utilize multiple cores. Each Python script takes a really long time to complete. The problem is that if I hit Ctrl+C in the middle of the Bash script, the Python scripts do not actually get killed. How can I write the Bash script so that killing it will also kill all its background children? Here's my original "reduced test case". Unfortunately I seem to have reduced it so much

问题 I have the following code. the build application is myprogram. If I launch myprogram and then killall myprogram and immediately after that I launch again myprogram then myprogram crash. the crash cause is due to that the management thread created by the first launch is not properly cleared before the second launch. so in the second launch whent myprogram try to create thread with the pthread and the old thread management is not removed yet so it causes a crash. Are there a way to kill the