keyword

R remove multiple text strings in data frame

我的梦境 提交于 2019-11-27 07:11:25
问题 New to R. I am looking to remove certain words from a data frame. Since there are multiple words, I would like to define this list of words as a string, and use gsub to remove. Then convert back to a dataframe and maintain same structure. wordstoremove <- c("ai", "computing", "ulitzer", "ibm", "privacy", "cognitive") a id text time username 1 "ai and x" 10 "me" 2 "and computing" 5 "you" 3 "nothing" 15 "everyone" 4 "ibm privacy" 0 "know" I was thinking something like: a2 <- apply(a, 1, gsub

F# equivalent of `is` keyword in C#?

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-11-27 06:41:29
问题 My first F# day. If I have this: let cat = Animal() Now how do I check at later stage if cat is Animal ? In C# bool b = cat is Animal; In F#? 回答1: @ildjarn deserves the credit here for answering first, but I'm submitting the answer here so it can be accepted. The F# equivalent of the C# is keyword is :? . For example: let cat = Animal() if cat :? Animal then printfn "cat is an animal." else printfn "cat is not an animal." 回答2: For demonstration only (don't define an is function): let is<'T>

Groovy: what's the purpose of “def” in “def x = 0”?

北城余情 提交于 2019-11-27 06:01:17
In the following piece of code (taken from the Groovy Semantics Manual page ), why prefix the assignment with the keyword def ? def x = 0 def y = 5 while ( y-- > 0 ) { println "" + x + " " + y x++ } assert x == 5 The def keyword can be removed, and this snippet would produce the same results. So what's the effect of the keyword def ? It's syntactic sugar for basic scripts. Omitting the "def" keyword puts the variable in the bindings for the current script and groovy treats it (mostly) like a globally scoped variable: x = 1 assert x == 1 assert this.binding.getVariable("x") == 1 Using the def

When must we use extern alias keyword in C#?

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-11-27 05:14:11
When must we use extern alias keyword in C#? Basically you only really need it when you want to use two types with the same fully qualified name (same namespace, same type name) from different assemblies. You declare a different alias for each assembly, so you can then reference them via that alias. Needless to say, you should try to avoid getting into that situation to start with :) It's there to help you hoist yourself out of a really deep hole dug by versioning. Say your first version of your program uses this class using System; namespace Acme.Financial.Banking { [Serializable] public

C# : 'is' keyword and checking for Not

两盒软妹~` 提交于 2019-11-27 05:00:27
问题 This is a silly question, but you can use this code to check if something is a particular type... if (child is IContainer) { //.... Is there a more elegant way to check for the "NOT" instance? if (!(child is IContainer)) { //A little ugly... silly, yes I know... //these don't work :) if (child !is IContainer) { if (child isnt IContainer) { if (child aint IContainer) { if (child isnotafreaking IContainer) { Yes, yes... silly question.... Because there is some question on what the code looks

Equivalent of “continue” in Ruby

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-11-27 04:56:37
问题 In C and many other languages, there is a continue keyword that, when used inside of a loop, jumps to the next iteration of the loop. Is there any equivalent of this continue keyword in Ruby? 回答1: Yes, it's called next . for i in 0..5 if i < 2 next end puts "Value of local variable is #{i}" end This outputs the following: Value of local variable is 2 Value of local variable is 3 Value of local variable is 4 Value of local variable is 5 => 0..5 回答2: next also, look at redo which redoes the

Is there a way to use “type” word as a variable name in Scala?

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2019-11-27 04:49:12
问题 It is frequent in my practice that a variable/argument is to store a type of something (as an enumeration value usually). And it usually makes no sense to specify an entity class in the name (like userType when a function is onlu intended to handle users). Is there a way I can use the "type" word for my needs instead of using scaffolds like "tipe", "kind", "somethingType" instead of it? The actual Scala type keyword is of such a rare use - it would be nice If I could undefine it (as a keyword

Using keywords as identifiers in F#

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-27 04:45:53
In C#, I can do the following: int @private = 15; And in VB.NET, I can do the following: Dim [Private] As Integer = 15 I am wondering if there is a way in F# to use reserved keywords as identifiers, like there is in VB.NET and C#? Jon Skeet Given section 3.4 of the F# 2.0 spec : Identifiers follow the specification below. Any sequence of characters that is enclosed in double-backtick marks (`` ``), excluding newlines, tabs, and double-backtick pairs themselves, is treated as an identifier. I suspect you can put it in backticks: ``private`` I haven't tried it though. 来源: https://stackoverflow

“new” keyword in Scala

心已入冬 提交于 2019-11-27 02:47:00
I have a very simple question - when should we apply the new keyword when creating objects in Scala? Is it when we try to instantiate Java objects only? Use the new keyword when you want to refer to a class 's own constructor: class Foo { } val f = new Foo Omit new if you are referring to the companion object's apply method: class Foo { } object Foo { def apply() = new Foo } // Both of these are legal val f = Foo() val f2 = new Foo If you've made a case class: case class Foo() Scala secretly creates a companion object for you, turning it into this: class Foo { } object Foo { def apply() = new

How to use “raise” keyword in Python [duplicate]

耗尽温柔 提交于 2019-11-27 02:36:09
This question already has an answer here: Manually raising (throwing) an exception in Python 7 answers I have read the official definition of "raise", but I still don't quite understand what it does. In simplest terms, what is "raise"? Example usage would help. Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams It has 2 purposes. yentup has given the first one. It's used for raising your own errors. if something: raise Exception('My error!') The second is to reraise the current exception in an exception handler, so that it can be handled further up the call stack. try: generate_exception() except SomeException as e: if