jit

问题 I'm trying to better understand how does the JIT compiler work for java in respect to volatile variable value caching. Consider the example presented in this question: Infinite loop problem with while loop and threading: boolean loaded = false; // not volatile!!! private boolean loadAsset() { new Thread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // Do something loaded = true; } }).start(); while (!loaded) { System.out.println("Not Loaded"); } System.out.println("Loaded"); return false; }

问题 I am trying to use Numba and access the GPU in order to accelerate the code, but I get the following error: in jit raise NotImplementedError("bounds checking is not supported for CUDA") NotImplementedError: bounds checking is not supported for CUDA I saw that another question was raised, but not completely specified nor answered here. I implemented the 2-for loops when I saw that the vectorized code ( y = corr*x + np.sqrt(1.-corr**2)*z ) did not work (same error). I also tried to play around

问题 I have a simple function to rank poker hands (the hands are strings). I call it with rA,rB = rank(a),rank(b) and here is my implementation. Works well without @jit(nopython=True), but with it, it fails: File "C:/Users/avi_na/Desktop/poker.py", line 190, in <module> rA,rB = rank(a),rank(b) File "C:\Continuum\anaconda3\lib\site-packages\numba\dispatcher.py", line 344, in _compile_for_args reraise(type(e), e, None) File "C:\Continuum\anaconda3\lib\site-packages\numba\six.py", line 658, in

问题 I have a simple function to rank poker hands (the hands are strings). I call it with rA,rB = rank(a),rank(b) and here is my implementation. Works well without @jit(nopython=True), but with it, it fails: File "C:/Users/avi_na/Desktop/poker.py", line 190, in <module> rA,rB = rank(a),rank(b) File "C:\Continuum\anaconda3\lib\site-packages\numba\dispatcher.py", line 344, in _compile_for_args reraise(type(e), e, None) File "C:\Continuum\anaconda3\lib\site-packages\numba\six.py", line 658, in

问题 I read about eval in C, and it makes sense that if you write a C string parser/evaluator, you can just map it to specific functions in your main C program. But it doesn't actually place it into executable memory from what I understand, like a JIT compiler seems to do. I don't fully understand JIT compilers (I never made one) but I get the gist. So what I'm wondering is if you can create sort of a JIT compiler in C without doing too much work of parsing C strings and converting to ASTs and

问题 I read about eval in C, and it makes sense that if you write a C string parser/evaluator, you can just map it to specific functions in your main C program. But it doesn't actually place it into executable memory from what I understand, like a JIT compiler seems to do. I don't fully understand JIT compilers (I never made one) but I get the gist. So what I'm wondering is if you can create sort of a JIT compiler in C without doing too much work of parsing C strings and converting to ASTs and

问题 I read about eval in C, and it makes sense that if you write a C string parser/evaluator, you can just map it to specific functions in your main C program. But it doesn't actually place it into executable memory from what I understand, like a JIT compiler seems to do. I don't fully understand JIT compilers (I never made one) but I get the gist. So what I'm wondering is if you can create sort of a JIT compiler in C without doing too much work of parsing C strings and converting to ASTs and

问题 I read about eval in C, and it makes sense that if you write a C string parser/evaluator, you can just map it to specific functions in your main C program. But it doesn't actually place it into executable memory from what I understand, like a JIT compiler seems to do. I don't fully understand JIT compilers (I never made one) but I get the gist. So what I'm wondering is if you can create sort of a JIT compiler in C without doing too much work of parsing C strings and converting to ASTs and

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64285816/c-sharp-weird-method-inlining-behavior

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60593588/writing-high-performance-javascript-code-without-getting-deoptimised