javadoc | 易学教程

How should one distribute the Javadoc for a Library?

阅读更多关于 How should one distribute the Javadoc for a Library?

问题 I am writing a custom library. It's build into a .jar archive. I am fully able to generate the javadoc, but I don't know how I should distribute it? Put it in the same .jar with the library Put it in a different .jar Some other way? And how to include the javadoc in another project that uses my lib? If I had put it in the same .jar, should I have written something in the manifest? If it's in a separate .jar, is including it in the project enough? I am using NetBeans 9.1. 回答1: I'd include the

How to automatically generate comments for getter/setter based on field comments in Eclipse?

阅读更多关于 How to automatically generate comments for getter/setter based on field comments in Eclipse?

I want Eclipse to automatically generate Javadoc comments for my getter and setter methods based on the previously defined comments for the fields. How can I achieve this? Background: A policy in our company is to comment every method and field (even if they have self-explanatory names). So I have to do redundant work by describing the fields and describing the getters / setters again. Example: /** * name of the dynamic strategy */ private String dynName; /** * get the name of the dynamic strategy * @return */ public String getDynName() { return dynName; } Searching the web showed that I'm not

Maven 3: Generate Javadoc for defined artifacts

阅读更多关于 Maven 3: Generate Javadoc for defined artifacts

I want to generate javadocs only for certain artifacts of my project from within a dedicated docs-project. That means that I would like to have an independent project called "docs" for example. In the docs/pom.xml I would like to define the artifacts that should be included in the generated javadocs. So far I learned that I have to generate a separate sources.jar for the projects I want to include. But I can't figure out how to go on from there. For now I can only imagine two approaches: Get the artifacts (sources.jar) I want to include, unpack them and somehow point the Javadoc plugin to the

enum.valueOf(String name) missing from Javadoc 1.5 and 1.6

阅读更多关于 enum.valueOf(String name) missing from Javadoc 1.5 and 1.6

问题 This is probably a stupid question, but I'm using the method enum.valueOf(String name) . No problem there, except that when I was checking the javadoc to find out more about this method, I couldn't find it. There is javadoc for valueOf(Class<T> enumType, String name) but none for enum.valueOf(String name) (which would suggest that a method with this signature doesn't exist - but clearly it does). Am I missing something here, or is this an oversight in the javadoc for the API? Thanks 回答1:

Eclipse formatter adds space in empty comment lines

阅读更多关于 Eclipse formatter adds space in empty comment lines

问题 The eclipse code formatter adds a trailing space in each empty Javadoc comment line (see screenshot). The formatter of a colleague is always removing those spaces (and thus producing annoying SVN diffs). He is claiming to use the same formatter settings (XML file). Nevertheless, I tried all the options in the comments tab of the formatter settings page - without success. Can it be a difference between eclipse versions? (I am using Springsource Tool Suite 2.7.1, which is based on Helios, I

How to create multiple levels of indentation in Javadoc?

阅读更多关于 How to create multiple levels of indentation in Javadoc?

问题 Suppose, that as part of documenting your code (Javadoc) you want to indicate that the relationships between elements using deep indentation. How can I create a nested list as: some element some other element yet some other element 回答1: <ul> <li>Element</li> <ul> <li>Subelement...</li> You can pretty freely use HTML inside javadoc comments. Update: Because it came up, I tried <ul> <li>one</li> <ul> <li>one point one</li> </ul> </ul> and get one one point one I agree proper nesting is better.

Linking to javadoc.io using Javadoc -link option

阅读更多关于 Linking to javadoc.io using Javadoc -link option

I am trying to link into some Javadocs hosted at javadoc.io (specifically, PowerMock's Javadocs) using the @link option. I have tried to add the URL to PowerMock's Javadocs to my -link flag, but can't get Javadoc to recognize it. I am using external links to other Javadocs just fine (e.g. Guava, Java SE 7) with Gradle as my build system. I have tried the following options: -link http://static.javadoc.io/org.powermock/powermock-core/1.6.3/ ^ I have confirmed that there is a package-list file in this directory -link http://static.javadoc.io/org.powermock/powermock-core/ -link http://javadoc.io

How to turn off the Javadoc hover in Eclipse (or selectively enable it)?

阅读更多关于 How to turn off the Javadoc hover in Eclipse (or selectively enable it)?

A fellow developer dislikes the Eclipse hovering Javadoc and would like to disable it (one option), or, better yet, only selectively enable it (other option). He's using Eclipse 3.3. Is this possible? ChssPly76 Not sure what you mean by "selectively" enabling it. Based on what? Directions below are for 3.5, I don't have 3.3 lying around to check but I'm pretty sure same settings were available. Go to Window - Preferences; select Java -> Editor -> Hovers on left hand side. You'll have to uncheck the Combined Hover option on the right; you can then either uncheck Javadoc option or check it but

Can't link to JDK10 in Javadoc comments

阅读更多关于 Can't link to JDK10 in Javadoc comments

问题 After upgrading from Java 9 to 10, links to the JDK no longer work when generating documentation with the Javadoc tool (e.g., for a file importing java.util.Optional , {@link Optional} renders as Optional instead of as Optional; same issue with @see , @param , @return , and anywhere else you normally see Javadoc links). I have a simple modularized project, and I'm using Maven with the Javadoc plugin ( source and target options set to 10 in the configuration section for the compiler plugin).

How can weakCompareAndSet fail spuriously if it is implemented exactly like compareAndSet?

阅读更多关于 How can weakCompareAndSet fail spuriously if it is implemented exactly like compareAndSet?

问题 (note that this question is not about CAS, it's about the "May fail spuriously" Javadoc). The only difference in the Javadoc between these two methods from the AtomicInteger class is that the weakCompareAndSet contains the comment: "May fail spuriously" . Now unless my eyes are cheated by some spell, both method do look to be doing exactly the same: public final boolean compareAndSet(int expect, int update) { return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(this, valueOffset, expect, update); } /* ... * May