javadoc

Recently I've observed a lot of people still giving links to javadocs of 1.4.2. This is not quite a good practice and I'd like to raise the question. This happens because search engines (Google at least) give the old javadoc if one searches for, let's say, java.lang.String So, how to get the javadoc for the correct (currently 1.6) version of JDK? Bozho In almost all cases, adding the version after the searched class gets the desired result on top. For example: "java.lang.String 6" "java.util.Collection 5" (note - it's not "1.6" - only "6") As they are updated, the tutorials are already

I'm attempting to create a basic maven site using the maven site plugin. So I added this to my pom: <reporting> <plugins> <!--JavaDoc setup--> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.7</version> <configuration> <defaultAuthor>Leon Blakey</defaultAuthor> <defaultVersion>${project.version}</defaultVersion> <links> <link>http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api</link> </links> </configuration> </plugin> </plugins> </reporting> And ran mvn site --errors [INFO] Error stacktraces are turned on. [INFO] Scanning for projects...

Is there an easy way / option of preventing javadoc warnings when building with Maven? We use the soyatec uml plugin for eclipse and it inserts special tags which make our builds throw lots of annoying warnings; I've looked around including on the soyatec site and have come up empty. @uml.property is an unknown tag maba The only answer I could find to this is by Configuring Custom Javadoc Tags . An example could be like this: <build> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.8.1</version> <configuration> <tags> <tag>

Is there a Javadoc for JSON.simple? Alex Jasmin I generated the Javadoc from source and put it online . The project wiki has some interesting pages and version 1.0.2 also had an interesting README . 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2640309/json-simple-api-javadoc

The ampoule project uses some tags in docstring, like the javadoc ones. For example from pool.py line 86: def start(self, ampChild=None): """ Starts the ProcessPool with a given child protocol. @param ampChild: a L{ampoule.child.AMPChild} subclass. @type ampChild: L{ampoule.child.AMPChild} subclass """ What are these tags, which tool uses it. Markup for a documentation tool, probably epydoc . cdleary Just for fun I'll note that the Python standard library is using Sphinx/reStructuredText, whose info field lists are similar. def start(self, ampChild=None): """Starts the ProcessPool with a given

I'm a long-time emacs user, and I'm now working about 1/2 time in Java. What are the best emacs libraries for Debugging Java Code Completion/Intellisense Javadoc browsing ? I've used JDEE on several projects. It handles Code Completion. I've never used it for debugging or browsing docs, but it's a big step up from a basic text editor. For javadoc I found http://javadochelp.sourceforge.net/index.html to be the best. Exuberant ctags is your best friend when it comes to navigation. I've had good success with jdibug for debugging Java code with Emacs. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41056

I implemented my own method defined in an interface. However when I try to add Javadoc to this method Eclipse gave me a comment like this: /* (non-Javadoc) * @see javax.servlet.ServletContextListener#contextInitialized(javax.servlet.ServletContextEvent) */ Actually, I really need to add some comment to this method. What should I do? The idea of adding a non-javadoc comment here is that in the generated javadoc the comment from the inherited method will be copied, which might be enough - and better than if you had an empty /** */ comment. At the same time, you can use the link in the source

Take the following implementation of a array-based stack of chars for example: public char peek() throws Underflow { if (!isEmpty()) { return stack[pos]; } else { throw new Underflow("Peeking at an empty stack."); } } Back when I'm using just a text editor I always use the @exception tag, but now my IDE (Netbeans) used @throws when generating the javadoc. So my question is, what is the difference between the two and when should one be preferred over another (using the above code for example)? There is none, they're synonyms. From the docs : Documenting Exceptions with @throws Tag NOTE - The