javadoc

I documented with Javadoc before and used the tags @see , @link or {@see foo} and {link foo} in my description to link to other classes. Now I tried doxygen and it seems that these tags are incompatible. If I run doxygen the complete tags are simply be interpreted as normal text. Are there any alternative tags which I can use to get the same features? Chris To link to other classes you should use the ref command. You can use the \link command, but you must end your link text with the \endlink command, which I suspect is your problem (although without example documentation I can't be sure).

I'm interested in changing the standard JavaDoc Doclet to generate some additional documentation before the normal output of tags. Looking at the code (using a decompiler) I can see that my only real option is to download the source for HtmlDoclet and friends and make a few modifications ... but the only source that's available is for the 1.3 version of the code, which doesn't understand recent updates such as annotations and so forth. FrVaBe Here you will find a hint to The Source for the Standard Doclet and a note that The source files are located in the directory src/share/classes/com/sun

Is there a standard or best practice for writing javadocs for Java/JVM language methods which contain side effects? I have a void method defined, which modifies one of the method parameters, but do not know how to document the actual return value (since there is no actual return). /** * @param obj - reference object * @return obj - obj.name is changed to 'hello' //TODO figure out javadoc annotation */ void methodName(Object obj) { if (obj != null) { obj.name = "hello"; } } It just seems that there is no good way to tag the side effects on the object, since the @param and @return annotations do

In my Gradle script, I have created a Javadoc task that generates documentation for my java files and for the auto-generated R.java, so that it creates links for my XML resources. I am using Doclava and even the @attr works as expected when referencing XML resources. However, when I add comments in my original XML files in order to document them, they are lost in the process of generating the R.java file and they are replaced by the default documentation. Is there a way to document my XML resources and make the documentation appear in the resulting javadoc? 来源： https://stackoverflow.com

As I know, @Documented annotation is used only by javadoc generator to generate javadocs from sources. So retention type should be SOURCE , but it's RUNTIME . Why? @Documented @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Target(ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE) public @interface Documented { } IMO that does not explain why @Documented needs runtime retention Yes, it does. Lets say I ship a jar file without the sources. A user can build a proper javadoc using only information from classfiles the the reason that classfile have proper annotations is becase they are RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME. 来源： https:/

Does anyone has an example how to use the sourceFileExcludes element in the Maven Javadoc Plugin ? I've tried the following, but cannot get it to work: <sourceFileExcludes> <sourceFileExclude>**/internal/*</sourceFileExclude> <sourceFileExclude>**/Model/*</sourceFileExclude> </sourceFileExcludes> Have you specified excludePackageNames , cause based on the docs you should use them instead of what you've written. <excludePackageNames>*.internal:org.acme.exclude1.*:org.acme.exclude2</excludePackageNames> which seemed to be more approriate. It might just not be working at the moment. There is bug

Suppose I have two classes: abstract class GenericA<E> { public void go(E e) {...} } public class IntegerA extends GenericA<Integer> { } Note that GenericA is package-private and generic, and IntegerA is public and not generic. Now, when I generate the public Javadoc (using Eclipse), I see the following in the IntegerA methods section: public void go(E e) The problem is that a reader of that Javadoc has no idea what E is; i.e., that E represents Integer . I would rather have the Javadoc say public void go(Integer e) Is there a way to make Javadoc behave the way I want it to? Only way I know is

I am trying to create javadoc for my client library. In MyOtherClass, I put the the below @see , and get warnings. MyOtherClass and MyClass both are in different packages, in the same project. @see MyClass#Constructor(Type1 param1, Type2 param2) warning - Tag @see: reference not found: MyClass#Constructor(Type1 param1, Type2 param2) Then I tried @see MyClass#MyClass(Type1 param1, Type2 param2) warning - Tag @see: reference not found: MyClass#MyClass(Type1 param1, Type2 param2) Also tried @see #MyClass(Type1 param1, Type2 param2) warning - Tag @see: reference not found: MyOtherClass#MyClass