interrupt

I have a thread in Java which calls t.interrupt(); making t (a different thread) be interrupted. I want the "t" thread to then catch an InterruptedException but Eclipse won't let me put an InterruptedException in saying it's not thrown in the try body. How can I get the InterruptedException to be called? Am I using t.interrupt() wrong? While the other answers are correct, a fuller explanation is appropriate. A thread can be safely interrupted (in the general sense of the word) only at specific points in its execution. In particular, it can be interrupted safely when it has issued a wait() call

Suppose an external interrupt request is made to 8086. Processor will handle the interrupt after completing the current instruction being executed (if any). Before handling of the interrupt, the state of the program will also be saved (PSW flag, registers etc.) by pushing data onto the stack segment. Now, most tutorials/documents describe that instruction pointer is also pushed onto the stack segment, which is okay because it was pointing to the next byte of instruction in the code segment (just before interrupt request was made). But what happens to the instruction queue? Is it also pushed

I am using stm32f0 MCU. I would like to transmit every single byte received from the uart out of the uart. I am enabling an interrupt on every byte received from uart. My code is quite simple. uint8_t Rx_data[5]; //Interrupt callback routine void HAL_UART_RxCpltCallback(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart) { if (huart->Instance == USART1) //current UART { HAL_UART_Transmit(&huart1, &Rx_data[0], 1, 100); HAL_UART_Receive_IT(&huart1, Rx_data, 1); //activate UART receive interrupt every time on receiving 1 byte } } My PC transmits ASCII 12345678 to stm32. If things work as expected, the PC should be

I have an http server (launched using http.Handle ) and I would like to do some operations. How can I do that (on linux) ? Is it possible to do those operations in case of a ctrl-C ? I'm not familiar with unix signals so the answer may be trivial. You can subscribe to the TERM and INT signals using the signal package. But note that these signals are only sent when the process is killed explicitly; normal exit (initiated by the process itself) does not involve any sort of signals. I think for normal exit just do something in the main routine (which supposedly should spawn worker goroutines and

Inspired by this question How can I force GDB to disassemble? I wondered about the INT 21h as a concept. Now, I have some very rusty knowledge of the internals, but not so many details. I remember that in C64 you had regular Interrupts and Non Maskable Interrupts, but my knowledge stops here. Could you please give me some clue ? Is it a DOS related strategy ? From here : A multipurpose DOS interrupt used for various functions including reading the keyboard and writing to the console and printer. It was also used to read and write disks using the earlier File Control Block (FCB) method. DOS can

I have a long running task, something like: public void myCancellableTask() { while ( someCondition ) { checkIfCancelRequested(); doSomeWork(); } } The task can be cancelled (a cancel is requested and checkIfCancelRequested() checks the cancel flag). Generally when I write cancellable loops like this, I use a flag to indicate that a cancel has been requested. But, I know I could also use Thread.interrupt and check if the thread has been interrupted. I'm not sure which would be the preferred approach and why, thoughts? thanks, Jeff bmargulies Interrupt will blast the thread out of a list of

I have used a static global variable and a static volatile variable in file scope, both are updated by an ISR and a main loop and main loop checks the value of the variable. here during optimization neither the global variable nor the volatile variable are optimized. So instead of using a volatile variable a global variable solves the problem. So is it good to use global variable instead of volatile? Any specific reason to use static volatile?? Any example program would be appreciable. Thanks in advance.. They are different things. I'm not an expert in volatile semantics. But i think it makes