integration-testing

问题 Is there a way in which I can test the content of the pseudo CSS class for :before on my element with Cypress? I have seen links documenting: Accessing nth-child pseudo element Accessing the actual content pseudo class of a normal CSS class But I have not found anything for CSS classes using the ::before pseudo class. Imagine the code: .myClass:before { content: "foo-"; } <div> <span class="myClass">Bar</span> </div> How could one test that 'foo-' is present? 回答1: There's a way to assert on

问题 I'm using MongoMemoryServer to write an integration test. I have two integration test files. When I run the IT tests I see the following. I don't understand why. I'm using jestjs test framework. I'm seeing the following error when I have two IT test files MongoError: pool is draining, new operations prohibited 37 | for (const key in collections) { 38 | const collection = collections[key]; > 39 | await collection.deleteMany(); | ^ 40 | } 41 | }; Here is my setup //db-handler.js const mongoose

问题 Rails provides label references for associations in fixtures like this: ### in pirates.yml reginald: name: Reginald the Pirate monkey: george ### in monkeys.yml george: name: George the Monkey pirate: reginald This works great for not-namedspaced models, but I'm using namespaces, and so Rails gets confused, and want to insert the labels instead of the label references. Any workaround or fix known? 回答1: Fixtures.identify seems to be the only solution, not really beautiful but better than ids.

问题 Rails provides label references for associations in fixtures like this: ### in pirates.yml reginald: name: Reginald the Pirate monkey: george ### in monkeys.yml george: name: George the Monkey pirate: reginald This works great for not-namedspaced models, but I'm using namespaces, and so Rails gets confused, and want to insert the labels instead of the label references. Any workaround or fix known? 回答1: Fixtures.identify seems to be the only solution, not really beautiful but better than ids.

问题 I have a model and I'm trying to test validation without invoking the database layer. Rather than describe with words I'll just post up some example code. The issue here is the ForeignKey relationship to Bar, which isn't relevant to what I'm trying to test but is stopping me from running the test that I want. First, myapp/models.py : from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError from django.db import models class BadFooError(ValidationError): pass class Bar(models.Model): description =

问题 I currently use junit5, wiremock and restassured for my integration tests. Karate looks very promising, yet I am struggling with the setup of data-driven tests a bit as I need to prepare a nested data structures which, in the current setup, looks like the following: abstract class StationRequests(val stations: Collection<String>): ArgumentsProvider { override fun provideArguments(context: ExtensionContext): java.util.stream.Stream<out Arguments>{ val now = LocalDateTime.now() val samples =

问题 I currently use junit5, wiremock and restassured for my integration tests. Karate looks very promising, yet I am struggling with the setup of data-driven tests a bit as I need to prepare a nested data structures which, in the current setup, looks like the following: abstract class StationRequests(val stations: Collection<String>): ArgumentsProvider { override fun provideArguments(context: ExtensionContext): java.util.stream.Stream<out Arguments>{ val now = LocalDateTime.now() val samples =

问题 I'm trying to write a test that checks for the existence of a route using Jasmine for Angular application: import { routes } from './app-routing.module'; import { UsersComponent } from './users/users.component'; describe('routes', () => { it('should contain route for /users', () => { const expectedRoute = { path: 'users', component: UsersComponent }; expect(routes).toContain(expectedRoute); }); }); but the test fails (probably because of object equality in Javascript How object equality

问题 My ViewModel has a method which returns a flow of PagingData . In my app, the data is fetched from the remote server, which is then saved to Room (the single source of truth): fun getChocolates(): Flow<PagingData<Chocolate>> { val pagingSourceFactory = { dao().getChocolateListData() } return Pager( config = PagingConfig( pageSize = NETWORK_PAGE_SIZE, maxSize = MAX_MEMORY_SIZE, enablePlaceholders = false ), remoteMediator = ChocolateRemoteMediator( api, dao ), pagingSourceFactory =

问题 Is there a way to specify order of execution inside cucumber? For example, rather than running cucumber feature/foo/foo.feature feature/foo/bar.feature to have those execute in that order... I want to run bundle exec cucumber and run in that specified order. I know that features/scenarios should be independent of each other but for the current tests I'm running it's not practical. If there is no "official way" (which seems to be the case) does anyone recommend a good design to implement such