implicit

How does this recursive List flattening work?

假装没事ソ 提交于 2019-11-28 18:27:59
A while back this was asked and answered on the Scala mailing list: Kevin: Given some nested structure: List[List[...List[T]]] what's the best (preferably type-safe) way to flatten it to a List[T] Jesper: A combination of implicits and default arguments works: case class Flat[T, U](fn : T => List[U]) implicit def recFlattenFn[T, U](implicit f : Flat[T, U] = Flat((l : T) => List(l))) = Flat((l : List[T]) => l.flatMap(f.fn)) def recFlatten[T, U](l : List[T])(implicit f : Flat[List[T], U]) = f.fn(l) Examples: scala> recFlatten(List(1, 2, 3)) res0: List[Int] = List(1, 2, 3) scala> recFlatten(List

Does VB.Net's lack of implicit interfaces make what I'm trying to do impossible?

为君一笑 提交于 2019-11-28 10:22:05
问题 I know VB.Net does not allow implicit interface implementation like C#. And thus code like the following has no direct VB.Net correlation: public interface IBackgroundWorkerAdapter { bool IsBusy { get; set; } bool WorkerReportsProgress { get; set; } bool WorkerSupportsCancellation { get; set; } event DoWorkEventHandler DoWork; event ProgressChangedEventHandler ProgressChanged; event RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler RunWorkerCompleted; void RunWorkerAsync(); void CancelAsync(); void

The behavior of a C compiler with old-styled functions without prototypes

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-11-28 04:34:58
问题 When my program consists of two files: main.c #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf("%lf\n",f()); return 0; } func.c double f(int a) { return 1; } compiler do not show any errors. When my program consists of only one file: main.c #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf("%lf\n",f()); return 0; } double f(int a) { return 1; } Visual C++ 2008 compiler show the following error: Error 2 error C2371: 'f' : redefinition; different basic types d:\temp\projects\function1\function1\1.c 8

explicit and implicit c#

三世轮回 提交于 2019-11-28 03:27:05
I'm new to C# and learning new words. I find it difficult to understand what's the meaning of these two words when it comes to programming c#. I looked in the dictionary for the meaning and here's what I got: Implicit "Something that is implicit is expressed in an indirect way." "If a quality or element is implicit in something, it is involved in it or is shown by it;" Explicit "Something that is explicit is expressed or shown clearly and openly, without any attempt to hide anything" "If you are explicit about something, you speak about it very openly and clearly." I would like to understand

How can implicits with multiple inputs be used in Scala?

二次信任 提交于 2019-11-27 23:00:55
For example, how can I write an expression where the following is implicitly applied: implicit def intsToString(x: Int, y: Int) = "test" val s: String = ... //? Thanks Implicit functions of one argument are used to automatically convert values to an expected type. These are known as Implicit Views. With two arguments, it doesn't work or make sense. You could apply an implicit view to a TupleN : implicit def intsToString( xy: (Int, Int)) = "test" val s: String = (1, 2) You can also mark the final parameter list of any function as implicit. def intsToString(implicit x: Int, y: Int) = "test"

Implicit return values in Ruby

杀马特。学长 韩版系。学妹 提交于 2019-11-27 20:37:13
I am somewhat new to Ruby and although I find it to be a very intuitive language I am having some difficulty understanding how implicit return values behave. I am working on a small program to grep Tomcat logs and generate pipe-delimited CSV files from the pertinent data. Here is a simplified example that I'm using to generate the lines from a log entry. class LineMatcher class << self def match(line, regex) output = "" line.scan(regex).each do |matched| output << matched.join("|") << "\n" end return output end end end puts LineMatcher.match("00:00:13,207 06/18 INFO stateLogger -

Scala implicit usage choices

泄露秘密 提交于 2019-11-27 20:31:13
问题 I've been wondering whether transparent implicit conversions are really such a good idea and whether it might actually be better to use implicits more, um, explicitly . For example, suppose I have a method which accepts a Date as a parameter and I have an implicit conversion which turns a String into a Date : implicit def str2date(s: String) : Date = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMdd").parse(s) private def foo(d: Date) Then obviously I can call this with a transparent implicit conversion: foo(

Scala Functional Literals with Implicits

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-11-27 19:05:12
Forgive me if this has already been asked elsewhere. I have a Scala syntax question involving function-values and implicit parameters. I'm comfortable using implicits with Scala's currying feature. For instance if I had a sum function and wanted to make the second argument an implicit: scala> def sum(a: Int)(implicit b: Int) = a + b sum: (a: Int)(implicit b: Int)Int Is there a way to do this using the function-value syntax? Ignoring the implicit for a moment, I typically write curried function-values like this: scala> val sum2 = (a: Int) => (b: Int) => a + b sum: (Int) => (Int) => Int =

Type of a function with Implicit parameters in Scala

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-27 18:26:24
问题 I would like to have a higher order function that takes in parameter a function that accepts a specific implicit parameter. To be more precise, I am trying to make a function that takes a Future creation method that depends on an implicit context and returns a method that doesn't depend on the context. To be more concrete, let's say that I have something like this: def foo(a: Int)(implicit ctx: ExecutionContext): Future[Float] = future { somelongBar... } I would like to do have a method like

popen implicitly declared even though #include <stdio.h> is added

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-11-27 16:02:23
问题 This is tiny snippet of my code. #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <arpa/inet.h> ... FILE * pipe; ... pipe = popen ("ls /tmp -1", "r"); ... pclose(pipe); blarg.c:106: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘popen’ blarg.c:106: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a