implicit

Partially applying a function that has an implicit parameter

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-11-30 17:35:35
Can I turn a method which takes an implicit parameter into a function? trait Tx def foo(bar: Any)(implicit tx: Tx) {} foo _ // error: could not find implicit value for parameter tx: Tx I am trying to achieve the following, preferably if I can somehow make it work with the plain call withSelection(deleteObjects) : trait Test { def atomic[A](fun: Tx => A): A def selection: Iterable[Any] def withSelection(fun: Iterable[Any] => Tx => Unit) { val sel = selection if (sel.nonEmpty) atomic { implicit tx => fun(sel)(tx) } } object deleteAction { def apply() { withSelection(deleteObjects) // ! } } def

Type class pattern in Scala doesn't consider inheritance?

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-11-30 16:53:59
问题 I am designing an API using type classes in some cases however I have encountered a problem with implicit resolution. As shown below, if there is an implicit object for type A but an object of type B extends A is passed to the method, then an implicit object cannot be found. Is there a way to make this work or do callers have to put implicit objects into scope for each subclass? Here is an example: class A class B extends A class T[+X] object T { implicit object TA extends T[A] } def call[X:T

Why to Use Explicit Interface Implementation To Invoke a Protected Method?

牧云@^-^@ 提交于 2019-11-30 15:03:38
问题 When browsing ASP.NET MVC source code in codeplex, I found it is common to have a class explicitly implementing interface. The explicitly implemented method/property then invoke another "protected virtual" method/property with same name. For example, public class MvcHandler : IHttpHandler, IRequiresSessionState { protected virtual bool IsReusable { get { return false; } } bool IHttpHandler.IsReusable { get { return IsReusable; } } } I'm now sure what's the benefit of this kind of programming.

Why to Use Explicit Interface Implementation To Invoke a Protected Method?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-11-30 12:42:01
When browsing ASP.NET MVC source code in codeplex , I found it is common to have a class explicitly implementing interface. The explicitly implemented method/property then invoke another "protected virtual" method/property with same name. For example, public class MvcHandler : IHttpHandler, IRequiresSessionState { protected virtual bool IsReusable { get { return false; } } bool IHttpHandler.IsReusable { get { return IsReusable; } } } I'm now sure what's the benefit of this kind of programming. For me, I prefer to just implicitly implement the interface IHttpHandler. I guess the author just don

How to declare traits as taking implicit “constructor parameters”?

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-11-30 10:36:37
问题 I'm designing a class hierarchy, which consists of a base class along with several traits. The base class provides default implementations of several methods, and the traits selectively override certain methods via abstract override , so as to acts as stackable traits/mixins. From a design perspective this works well, and maps to the domain so that I can add a filtering function from here (one trait) with a predicate from here (another trait) etc. However, now I'd like some of my traits to

Implicit parameter resolution for higher kinded types

早过忘川 提交于 2019-11-30 09:12:28
Consider the following code: object foo { trait Bar[Q[_]] implicit object OptionBar extends Bar[Option] def test[T, C[_]](c: C[T])(implicit bar: Bar[C]) = () def main(args: Array[String]) { test(Some(42): Option[Int]) //??? } } This works, but I need to type the Some(42) as Option[Int], else the implicit object OptionBar won't be resolved (because a Bar[Some] is expected instead). Is there a way to avoid the explicit typing, so that I get the implicit OptionBar object in test even if I feed test with a Some or None? [Clarification] I used Option here just as example, it should also work if I

Find root of implicit function in Mathematica

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-11-30 07:47:19
Find root of implicit function in Mathematica I have an implicit function, for example: f(x,y) = x^3 + x*y + y^2 - 36 I want to find the root, ie solutions to the equation f(x,y) = 0 Drawing the solution is easy: ContourPlot[x^3 + x*y + y^2 - 36 == 0, {x, -2 Pi, 2 Pi}, {y, -3 Pi, 3 Pi}] however I would like to have the data that is in the plot and not only the visual plot. So how do I find the data of the plot? tomd I'm not sure if I am interpreting your second question properly, but assuming you require a list of (x,y) points from the generated ContourPlot, one way of doing this might be the

When must we use implicit and explicit operators in C#?

蓝咒 提交于 2019-11-30 05:12:15
问题 What is the usage of these operators? 回答1: Basically when you want to provide conversions between types. LINQ to XML provides good examples... There's an implicit conversion from string to XName, so you can write: XName name = "element"; but there's an explicit conversion from XAttribute to int (and many other types) so you have to include a cast in your code: int value = (int) element.Attribute("age"); Think very carefully before providing implicit conversions - they're rarely a good idea;

Partially applying a function that has an implicit parameter

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-11-30 01:38:44
问题 Can I turn a method which takes an implicit parameter into a function? trait Tx def foo(bar: Any)(implicit tx: Tx) {} foo _ // error: could not find implicit value for parameter tx: Tx I am trying to achieve the following, preferably if I can somehow make it work with the plain call withSelection(deleteObjects) : trait Test { def atomic[A](fun: Tx => A): A def selection: Iterable[Any] def withSelection(fun: Iterable[Any] => Tx => Unit) { val sel = selection if (sel.nonEmpty) atomic { implicit

IdentityServer4 PostLogoutRedirectUri null

心不动则不痛 提交于 2019-11-29 22:58:35
问题 I am attempting to get the implicit flow working for IdentityServer4. Login and logout work correctly, however the PostLogoutRedirectUri is coming back null, despite setting the value where it needs to be set. What I would like is for the logout process to redirect back to my application after the logout is complete. I am getting the logoutId correctly, and Logout calls BuildLoggedOutViewModelAsync: [HttpPost] [ValidateAntiForgeryToken] public async Task<IActionResult> Logout(LogoutInputModel