hamcrest

问题 The test method below appear in a spring-guide tutorial. Is there a less convoluted syntax to write this test or how can I break it apart into smaller chunks? verify(orderService).createOrder( org.mockito.Matchers.<CreateOrderEvent>argThat( allOf( org.hamcrest.Matchers.<CreateOrderEvent> hasProperty("details", hasProperty("dateTimeOfSubmission", notNullValue())), org.hamcrest.Matchers.<CreateOrderEvent>hasProperty("details", hasProperty("name", equalTo(CUSTOMER_NAME))), org.hamcrest.Matchers.

问题 Is there a way to build a combined Hamcrest matcher which tests an object and the property of this object? - pseudo code: both( instanceof(MultipleFailureException.class) ).and( // pseudo code starts adapt( new Adapter<MultipleFailureException, Iterable<Throwable>() { public Iterable<Throwable> getAdapter(MultipleFailureException item) { return item.getFailures(); } }, // pseudo code ends everyItem(instanceOf(IllegalArgumentException.class)) ) ) Background: I have a JUnit test, which iterates

问题 I understand that the solution is to somehow make sure that Junit is loaded after hamcrest. I have an intellij project, in which I setup an external library, which contains both JUnit and JMock and hamcrest. How can I make sure that this error does not show up 回答1: You should make sure the compatibility of libraries(jars). If a class inside jar uses some method from class which is in another jar, and this used method is newly added and you are using old jar then definitely you will get java

问题 I want to use a Hamcrest matcher inside a TestNG test and with a soft assert specifically. How can I do this? I know that I can use Hamcrest's assertions inside a test like: assertThat(actual, containsInAnyOrder(expected)); But I can't understand how can I use TestNG soft assert method like this one: SoftAssert softAssert = new SoftAssert(); together with a Hamcrest matcher. Because I can't invoke the Hamcrest's assertThat on TestNG's softAssert like softAssert.assertThat(...) So, what is the

问题 The matcher IsIterableContainingInAnyOrder has two overloads for the static factory method containsInAnyOrder (both have the return type Matcher<java.lang.Iterable<? extends T>> ): containsInAnyOrder(java.util.Collection<Matcher<? super T>> itemMatchers) containsInAnyOrder(Matcher<? super T>... itemMatchers) Now consider the following program: import static org.hamcrest.collection.IsIterableContainingInAnyOrder.containsInAnyOrder; import static org.hamcrest.core.IsEqual.equalTo; import static

问题 As a follow up question for my question in Dealing arrays with hamcrest and rest assured How can I use hamcrest with restassured so that I can test { "mobilenum": "+6519829340", "firstname": "Allen", "lastname": "Edwards", "location": "Singapore" "outbound": "YES" "count" : 15 }, { "mobilenum": "+6519829340", "firstname": "Allen", "lastname": "Edwards", "location": "Singapore" "outbound": "NO" "count" : 9 } That there exist two types of data, one containing mobilenum, firstname, etc having

问题 I'm attempting to familiarize myself with lambdaj, and am unsure how the best way to solve this problem. Given the following test: @Test public void test() { final List<String> l1 = new ArrayList<>(); final List<String> l2 = new ArrayList<>(); l1.add("same"); l1.add("Upper"); l1.add("lower"); l2.add("same"); l2.add("upper"); l2.add("lower"); l2.add("extra"); final List<String> l3 = Lambda.filter(Matchers.not(Matchers.isIn(l1)), l2); Assert.assertThat("There should be one item in l3", l3.size(

问题 I have an android project, which have an custom object array list, now I want to filter that array list. But always I get zero (size of new array list). public static <T> List<T> filter(Matcher<?> matcher, Iterable<T> iterable) { if (iterable == null) return new LinkedList<T>(); else{ List<T> collected = new LinkedList<T>(); Iterator<T> iterator = iterable.iterator(); if (iterator == null) return collected; while (iterator.hasNext()) { T item = iterator.next(); if (matcher.matches(item))

问题 Having the test case using JUnit 4.12: import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.nullValue; import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat; //... @Test public void testShouldReturnNull() { final Long result = getIdFunction.apply(null); assertThat(result, is(nullValue())); } Sonar says: Add at least one assertion to this test case. Why does Sonar says that there are no assertions and how it can be fixed? SonarQube v6.7 回答1: I've just found a solution for this case: Here should be used assertThat

问题 I have a stupid thing, but I really can´t see what am I missing: I have a test: @Test public void testeBerechneRendite() { get("/rendite?jahresnettomiete=8000&kaufpreis=100000&nebenkosten=500") .then().body(is(closeTo(0.079, 0.01))); } Error is: Response body doesn't match expectation. Expected: is a numeric value within <0.01> of <0.079> Actual: 0.07960199004975124 It seams I don`t understand the closeTo(double, double). From my understanding all numbers between 0.069 and 0.089 should be