git-merge-conflict

问题 I'm using Eclipse 2019-12 working with Git using Eclipse UI only If I commit to master before pull previous commits I can't push my commit to server I used Team -> Merge Tool (Merge option was disabled) I merge the changes (shows some files) and then push to upstream Expected: all commits are merged Actual: previous commits weren't added to master Is using Merge tool wrong for conflict? can I use rebase without losing any commits? can't pull previous commits after commit 来源： https:/

问题 For a simple example, let's say we have a repo where an incorrect line was added to a file a . $ git init Initialized empty Git repository in /someplace/.git/ $ echo "a1\nb2" > a $ echo b1 > b $ git add . $ git commit -m init [master (root-commit) 917f3b9] init 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 a create mode 100644 b The branch master then forks off new branch f . $ git branch f In master , we then add another line to the incorrect file. $ echo b3 >> a $ git commit -am

问题 Usually when we merge feature branch with master or any other branch and if same file is modified in different branches but on different lines then GIT does resolve the conflict automatically. We dont want these merge happened automatically and expecting GIT should warn us with list of common files modified in two branches to be merged. e.g. In Master, we have file test1.txt as below AAA BBB Feature branch (feature/test1) created out of master and updated file test1.txt AAA BBB CCC also added

问题 I commited a new feature locally, pulled from remote and got merge conflicts. After resolving them, my feature stopped working. I assumed that I made an error and asked a question about this yesterday. So I did a hard reset to my previous commit, repeated the merge and resolved the conflicts I was shown. But again, my feature stopped working. I looked through the code manually and saw that part of the code of my local commit was changed by the pull but no merge conflict had been displayed for

问题 Q1: How can I reproduce this scenario? (I unsuccessfully tried to reproduce it) Q2: What does this Unmerged paths:... both modified:... state mean? I did a git stash (push) and got into an Unmerged paths: ... both modified: ... state, and I don't know why / what it means. My steps: modified a single file (I may have done a git add -p , and then might have modified the working tree copy (I don't remember)) $ git stash -m 'my message' $ git status Unmerged paths: (use "git restore --staged

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59622140/git-merge-vs-git-rebase-for-merge-conflict-scenarios

问题 I currently have a file named test1 in a branch named branch1 created from master and another file also named test1 in a branch named branch2 also created from master . What's gonna happen to the code written in both files if I merge the 2 branches in master? 回答1: Steps do to probably : Merge branch1 to master . This should go smoothly. Merge master to branch2 . Here you will probably get a merge conflict. Resolve it. Merge branch2 to master . This will make sure your master is never "poluted

问题 I followed the next tutorial https://medium.com/@topspinj/how-to-git-rebase-into-a-forked-repo-c9f05e821c8a this is my actual repo: As you can see there are two commits in my pull request and one commit in the original repository. I want to update my forked repository to bring the changes they made in its last commit before run the git fetch command to bring the changes my git status tell me: $ git status En la rama 13.0 Tu rama está actualizada con 'origin/13.0'. Then I made git remote add

问题 I'm working on a test script and trying to reproduce git merge conflict DD when shown via "git status --short". I've seen this conflict type in the past. DD (unmerged, both deleted) I keep coming up with no conflict with everything I try. What steps do I need to perform to generate "DD" conflict? What does a "DD" conflict mean? I saw this: Git: how to create different unmerged states? But the steps listed there no longer produce any conflicts in later versions of Git. 回答1: Found a link to

问题 We recently switched from SVN to GIT, and I'm having some trouble converting our previous workflow. Mostly everything works, but today I got a weird cherry-pick conflict. I'm able to resolve the conflict, but I would like to know where this came from, because to my understanding there shouldn't be a conflict in this situation. Setup In our repository we have a master branch on which we develop. Four times a year we release a new version. We branch of of master into Release-x and this gets