git-cherry-pick

In a Git cherry-pick or rebase merge conflict, how are BASE (aka “the ancestor”), LOCAL, and REMOTE determined?

寵の児 提交于 2019-11-29 20:19:19
In a normal Git merge conflict, the three versions of a file in play for the three-way merge are roughly as follows: LOCAL: the version from my branch REMOTE: the version from the other branch BASE: the version from the common ancestor of the two branches (in particular, the common ancestor of my branch's HEAD and the other branch's HEAD) When a Git cherry-pick generates a merge conflict, there is no common ancestor, properly speaking, so how are these things determined? The same could be asked about rebase. cherry-pick Unless I have misled myself, then if you do "git cherry-pick <commit C>",

How do cherry-pick and revert work?

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-11-29 04:34:06
I am trying to understand what merge and rebase do, in terms of set operations in math. In the following, "-" means diff (similar to taking set difference in math, but "A-B" means those in A but not in B and minus those in B not in A), and "+" means patch (i.e. taking disjoint union in math. I haven't used patch before, so I am not sure). From Version Control with Git, by Loeliger, 2ed The command git cherry-pick commit applies the changes introduced by the named commit on the current branch. It will introduce a new, distinct commit. Strictly speaking, using git cherry-pick doesn’t alter the

force git to accept cherry-pick's changes

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2019-11-28 17:24:32
问题 I did cherry-pick from a gerrit review in my branch. In gerrit code review, I have two patch sets and I cherry-picked patch one before, so now I want to do the second patch set, but there are conflicts, how can I force git to accept all changes? Thanks! 回答1: You can tell it to always prefer the changes of the commit you are cherry-picking: git cherry-pick commitish --strategy-option theirs commitish can be a SHA-1 hash of a commit, or a branch-name for the lastest commit of that branch,

In a Git cherry-pick or rebase merge conflict, how are BASE (aka “the ancestor”), LOCAL, and REMOTE determined?

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-11-28 16:04:47
问题 In a normal Git merge conflict, the three versions of a file in play for the three-way merge are roughly as follows: LOCAL: the version from my branch REMOTE: the version from the other branch BASE: the version from the common ancestor of the two branches (in particular, the common ancestor of my branch's HEAD and the other branch's HEAD) When a Git cherry-pick generates a merge conflict, there is no common ancestor, properly speaking, so how are these things determined? The same could be

What is the difference between git cherry-pick and git format-patch | git am?

空扰寡人 提交于 2019-11-28 13:45:32
I sometimes need to cherry-pick a tag with a certain fix into my branch, and used to do so via git cherry-pick tags/myfix This works, but cherry-picking takes an increasingly long time doing "inexact rename detection". My hunch was that this could be faster with git format-patch -k -1 --stdout tags/myfix | git am -3 -k In fact, this turned out to apply the fix instantly, leaving my branch in exactly the same state as cherry-picking. Now my question is, what exactly does cherry-picking do differently? I thought cherry-picking was basically implemented as exactly this, but I must have been

Why does this cherry-pick have a conflict?

不羁的心 提交于 2019-11-27 21:20:45
I know git cherry-pick is a command that use to apply the changes of specified commit, but I think I just don't really understand the way it works. Let's say a repo act like that: git init echo a>a git add .; git commit -am 'master add line a' git checkout -b dev echo b>>a git commit -am 'dev add line b' echo c>>a git commit -am 'dev add line c' git checkout master git cherry-pick dev I thought cherry-pick command would work well and change file a into: a c but in fact I got the following message: error: could not apply 08e8d3e... dev add line c hint: after resolving the conflicts, mark the

How do cherry-pick and revert work?

一曲冷凌霜 提交于 2019-11-27 18:36:44
问题 I am trying to understand what merge and rebase do, in terms of set operations in math. In the following, "-" means diff (similar to taking set difference in math, but "A-B" means those in A but not in B and minus those in B not in A), and "+" means patch (i.e. taking disjoint union in math. I haven't used patch before, so I am not sure). From Version Control with Git, by Loeliger, 2ed The command git cherry-pick commit applies the changes introduced by the named commit on the current branch.

Merge up to a specific commit

倖福魔咒の 提交于 2019-11-27 16:37:37
I created a new branch named newbranch from the master branch in git. Now I have done some work and want to merge newbranch to master ; however, I have made some extra changes to newbranch and I want to merge newbranch up to the fourth-from-the-last commit to master . I used cherry-pick but it shows the message to use the right options: git checkout master git cherry-pick ^^^^HEAD newbranch Can I use git merge to do it instead? git merge newbranch <commitid> KL-7 Sure, being in master branch all you need to do is: git merge <commit-id> where commit-id is hash of the last commit from newbranch

Merge up to a specific commit

落花浮王杯 提交于 2019-11-27 04:08:53
问题 I created a new branch named newbranch from the master branch in git. Now I have done some work and want to merge newbranch to master ; however, I have made some extra changes to newbranch and I want to merge newbranch up to the fourth-from-the-last commit to master . I used cherry-pick but it shows the message to use the right options: git checkout master git cherry-pick ^^^^HEAD newbranch Can I use git merge to do it instead? git merge newbranch <commitid> 回答1: Sure, being in master branch

Why does this cherry-pick have a conflict?

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-26 20:37:28
问题 I know git cherry-pick is a command that use to apply the changes of specified commit, but I think I just don't really understand the way it works. Let's say a repo act like that: git init echo a>a git add .; git commit -am 'master add line a' git checkout -b dev echo b>>a git commit -am 'dev add line b' echo c>>a git commit -am 'dev add line c' git checkout master git cherry-pick dev I thought cherry-pick command would work well and change file a into: a c but in fact I got the following