getter-setter

Custom Getter & Setter iOS 5

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-11-27 10:18:07
问题 I want to override the getter and setter in my ObjC class using ARC. .h File @property (retain, nonatomic) Season *season; .m File @synthesize season; - (void)setSeason:(Season *)s { self.season = s; // do some more stuff } - (Season *)season { return self.season; } Am I missing something here? 回答1: Yep, those are infinite recursive loops. That's because self.season = s; is translated by the compiler into [self setSeason:s]; and return self.season; is translated into return [self season]; Get

Property getter/setter have no effect in Python 2

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-11-27 09:28:54
I'm a bit confused about properties in python. Consider the following code class A: @property def N(self): print("A getter") return self._N @N.setter def N(self,v): print("A setter") self._N = v def __init__(self): self._N = 1 class B: @property def N(self): print("B getter") return self.a.N @N.setter def N(self,v): print("B setter") self.a.N = v def __init__(self): self.a = A() if __name__ == '__main__': b=B() b.N = 2 print(b.N, b.a.N) b.N = 3 print(b.N, b.a.N) B should be something like a wrapper for A. It uses getters and setters to map A's properties on itself (of course one could also do

Java Getters and Setters

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2019-11-27 08:48:18
Is there a better standard way to create getters and setters in Java? It is quite verbose to have to explicitly define getters and setters for each variable. Is there a better standard annotations approach? Does Spring have something like this? Even C# has properties. Carl Smotricz I'm not sure if you'd consider it 'standard', but Project Lombok addresses this problem. They use annotations to replace much of the verbosity of Java. Some people are looking at alternative Java sibling languages, such as Groovy or Scala. I'm afraid it will take some years -if at all- before the JSR figures out a

Adding a getter makes using an underscore incorrect syntax

爷,独闯天下 提交于 2019-11-27 08:17:46
问题 I have a class with the following header: #import <Foundation/Foundation.h> @interface CustomClass : NSObject @property (strong, nonatomic) NSString *foo; @end With the following implementation that does not show any errors: #import "CustomClass.h" @implementation CustomClass - (void) setFoo:(NSString *)foo { _foo = foo; } @end Being a complete beginner to Objective-C, I am baffled when I add the following method to the implementation: - (NSString *)foo { return _foo; } because now there is

Python @property decorator not working

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-11-27 07:42:57
问题 Could anyone find a problem with this @property decorator? I cannot seem to get it to assert correctly. I'm sure I'm doing some really simple thing wrong, but can anyone point my tired eyes in the right direction please? class A: def __init__(self): self.a = 0 self._b = 0 @property def b(self): return self.b @b.getter def b(self): if self._b is None: return 0 return self._b @b.setter def b(self, val): self._b = (val * 20) def test_getter_setter(): obj = A() obj.a = 1 #obj.b = 2 print obj.a,

c#: getter/setter

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-11-27 06:56:32
I saw something like the following somewhere, and was wondering what it meant. I know they are getters and setters, but want to know why the string Type is defined like this. Thanks for helping me. public string Type { get; set; } Those are Auto-Implemented Properties (Auto Properties for short). The compiler will auto-generate the equivalent of the following simple implementation: private string _type; public string Type { get { return _type; } set { _type = value; } } That is an auto-property and it is the shorthand notation for this: private string type; public string Type { get { return

C# getters, setters declaration [duplicate]

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-11-27 04:37:24
问题 Possible Duplicates: Why use getters and setters? C# 3.0 Auto-Properties - useful or not? Is there a difference between defining properties the following way - // private, with getter & setter private string fName; public string Name { get { return this.fName } set { this.fName = value } } // define as a Property public string Name { get; set;} As far as I can tell, it only looks like a stylistic preference. Am I missing something? 回答1: Differences: The second form will only compile with a C#

Instance member cannot be used on type

无人久伴 提交于 2019-11-27 04:08:34
I have the following class: class ReportView: NSView { var categoriesPerPage = [[Int]]() var numPages: Int = { return categoriesPerPage.count } } Compilation fails with the message: Instance member 'categoriesPerPage' cannot be used on type 'ReportView' What does this mean? Daniel Krom You just have syntax error when saying = {return self.someValue} . The = isn't needed. Use : var numPages: Int { get{ return categoriesPerPage.count } } if you want get only you can write var numPages: Int { return categoriesPerPage.count } with the first way you can also add observers as set willSet & didSet

Should I or should I not use getter and setter methods? [closed]

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-11-27 03:15:01
问题 Okay, this is really bugging me and I'm starting to think it all comes down to personal choice rather than a particular way of being more efficient or writing better code: Should I or should I not use getter/setter methods within a PHP project? The answers so far that I've read are rather conflicting and not entirely suited towards PHP, which is not a compiled language. For example, take this question on Stack Overflow ("Why use getters and setters?"). There's a number of good reasons

Why would you declare getters and setters method private? [duplicate]

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-11-27 02:33:44
问题 This question already has an answer here: Why use getters and setters/accessors? 38 answers I saw a code where getters and setters methods are declared private. I am trying to figure out the logic behind it, and I am really having hard time to understand why would you declare them as private? That's exactly opposite of what we are trying to achieve through getters and setters. 回答1: I can think of several reasons: you want to prevent future public access. If a different programmer sees your