geolocation

My application is powered by jquery mobile and uses geolocation. After my application attempts to get the user's location, the (Chrome) browser prompts the user: Example.com wants to track your physical location [allow] [deny] My goal is: If the user clicks "Allow", function 1 is called (location is used by app). If the user clicks "Deny", function 2 is called (address form appears). How can I bind a function to the event that occurs (if any) when the user clicks the "Allow" or "Deny" button? The getCurrentPosition function accepts two function arguments. Heck, the first is executed when you

I am developing a small android application in which I want to find out the user's current location by using the network provider. I tried this in following ways but it's not giving me any output : networklocationManager = (LocationManager) this .getSystemService(Context.LOCATION_SERVICE); // Define a listener that responds to location updates LocationListener networklocationListener = new LocationListener() { public void onLocationChanged(Location location) { Log.i("********************************", "this is my network location " + location); String Location_text = "NETWORK LOCATION latitude

Its seems like in new chrome version on MacOs on Linux Mint and on Windows geolocations doesnt works! Its returns error: "ERROR(2): Network location provider at ' https://www.googleapis.com/ ' : Returned error code 403." Does anyone has same problem? Must be a bug in the latest version of Chrome, also happens in the page of Google Maps API: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/map-geolocation Hopefully it will be fixed fast. Edited: Try now, it works :) Apparently this API has been forbidden access from insecure locations see here I filed a bug ticket here:

I have a problem with onLocationChanged event in Android. Here's the triggering: case R.id.start: { Points.add(overlay.getMyLocation()); // Points' type is ArrayList<GeoPoint> mgr.requestLocationUpdates(best, 0, 3, locationListener); } break; And here's the onLocationChanged method: public void onLocationChanged(Location location) { i++; Points.add(overlay.getMyLocation()); MapOverlay mapOverlay = new MapOverlay(Points.get(i-1), Points.get(i)); map.getOverlays().add(mapOverlay); //does the drawing mMapController.animateTo(Points.get(i)); } So, onLocationChanged is called only once and only

I'm setting up a iPhone tracking system for my friends, so they can submit their location to my website by their iPhone, anywhere, anytime - by WiFi or cellular data. The website will use Google Maps for their coordination's so that my other friends can track where they are, however, it is the accuracy of the IP to coordinates to Google Maps is what I'm concerned about, exactly how accurate is it to use Google Maps that would track down the locations by an IP address? I was thinking about 95%, but this was tested in a village which was quite fairly accurate, but what happens if it was in a

I'm using navigator.geolocation.watchPosition in JavaScript, and I want a way to deal with the possibility that the user might submit a form relying on location before watchPosition has found its location. Ideally the user would see a 'Waiting for location' message periodically until the location was obtained, then the form would submit. However, I'm not sure how to implement this in JavaScript given its lack of a wait function. Current code: var current_latlng = null; function gpsSuccess(pos){ //console.log('gpsSuccess'); if (pos.coords) { lat = pos.coords.latitude; lng = pos.coords.longitude

Apart from setting a cookie the first time round, is there a way of detecting whether a user has already given permission for navigator.geolocation to return the lat/long of the browser? If there is, what is it and is it the same across all browsers or different across all browsers? This subject has been partially answered elsewhere According to GeoLocation API – Chrome / Safari – Permission management and Visual Differences , Chrome asks for a revokable one-time permission. I haven't finished reading the article, but it would seem that storage of permissions is not a purely-Chrome thing to do