generic-programming

Is there a better way of obtaining an object's field getters other than java reflection api or i am misusing PropertyDescriptor's getReadMethod?

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-02 18:06:25
问题 Context: I am building an Excel document in a generic way with data i receive from a SOAP service endpoint. I receive the data as a List and i have the model (JavaBeans) for every Object i receive according to the method called. So I set the first row of the sheet as the header from the object's fields (getDeclaredFields). Then i go on filling up the column row by row with values from the list of objects. The problem: I haven't found a workable way of getting the object's field values. I have

Generics/templates in python?

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-12-02 14:16:40
How does python handle generic/template type scenarios? Say I want to create an external file "BinaryTree.py" and have it handle binary trees, but for any data type. So I could pass it the type of a custom object and have a binary tree of that object. How is this done in python? Python uses duck typing , so it doesn't need special syntax to handle multiple types. If you're from a C++ background, you'll remember that, as long as the operations used in the template function/class are defined on some type T (at the syntax level), you can use that type T in the template. So, basically, it works

Multiple structs, same fields that need to be accessed in a method

别说谁变了你拦得住时间么 提交于 2019-12-02 10:42:46
I currently try to write some lil literal console game for fun in C. For that, i need to be able to print window-like structures in ... well ... C. I want to use a generic rendering method (lets call it frame_render(...) ) to render all different "ui elements" The problem now is: how to solve this? given the scenario: // Theoretical base struct frame { int x; int y; int width; int height; } struct button { int x; int y; int width; int height; ... } struct whatever { int x; int y; int width; int height; ... } how could i ensure that my x , y , width and height are always in the correct spot

Rationale behind member function swap

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-02 10:17:44
In the standard library, if a class type has a specialized swap algorithm, then it will have a member function swap and a free function swap that simply forwards to the member function. I don't quite get the rationale behind having both of them (and thus code duplication) but not just the free function one. Note that, when I say the free function, I take to mean the specialized free swap function, not the generic std::swap function template. Such a specialized function may have privileged access to the relevant class by being a friend of it. I have two points to support just leaving the free

Is there a better way of obtaining an object's field getters other than java reflection api or i am misusing PropertyDescriptor's getReadMethod?

北战南征 提交于 2019-12-02 10:06:38
Context: I am building an Excel document in a generic way with data i receive from a SOAP service endpoint. I receive the data as a List and i have the model (JavaBeans) for every Object i receive according to the method called. So I set the first row of the sheet as the header from the object's fields (getDeclaredFields). Then i go on filling up the column row by row with values from the list of objects. The problem: I haven't found a workable way of getting the object's field values. I have tried using the getters with the java reflection API with something like this answer's https:/

How to specific a Java Generic class dynamicly

无人久伴 提交于 2019-12-02 07:17:18
If I specific a method which return a generic class,how can I do than I can specific the type of generic class dynamicly ? for example try { Class c =Class.forName(keytype); Class d= Class.forName(valuetype); KafkaConsumer<c,d> consumerconsumer = new KafkaConsumer<c,d>(PropertiesUtil.getPropsObj(configPath)); return consumer ; } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } But the code above is not OK. How can I do than I can achieve that? Generic syntax is good at compile-time only. None of the types in a generic class or method are available at runtime. This is called type

How to use shapeless to convert generic Map[String, Any] to case class inside generic function?

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-12-02 06:12:37
问题 I'm trying to follow the answer here https://stackoverflow.com/a/31641779/1586965 That is, I want to be able to convert (potentially nested) Map[String, Any] to a case class. scalaVersion := "2.11.8" val shapelessV = "2.3.3" If I try to wrap the code in the above answer in another generic function, I can't seem to get it to compile import shapeless._, labelled._ import FromMap._ def usesGenerics[P](map: Map[String, Any]): P = { to[P].from(mp).get } I get the following compile error could not

How can I write this GEq instance?

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-02 04:25:38
问题 I have datatypes Tup2List and GTag (from the answer to How can I produce a Tag type for any datatype for use with DSum, without Template Haskell?) I want to write a GEq instance for GTag t , which I think requires also having one for Tup2List . How can I write this instance? My guess at why it doesn't work is because there's no such thing as a partial Refl - you need to match the whole structure all at once for the compiler to give you the Refl, whereas I'm trying to just unwrap the outermost

Difference between add_lvalue_reference_t<T> and T&

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-12-01 15:20:57
问题 Suppose you have a template argument T . What are the differences between add_cv_t<T> and const volatile T add_const_t<T> and const T add_volatile_t<T> and volatile T add_lvalue_reference_t<T> and T& add_rvalue_reference_t<T> and T&& add_pointer_t<T> and T* ? Why should I use add_rvalue_reference_t<T> instead of T&& for example. Are there any rules when to choose which? 回答1: add_cv_t<T> and const volatile T add_const_t<T> and const T add_volatile_t<T> and volatile T No difference; the

Generic Type Argument checked by Class Parameter can be hacked, any better ways?

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-01 11:07:51
Consider the class: class OnlyIntegerTypeAllowed<T> { OnlyIntegerTypeAllowed(Class<T> clazz) { System.out.println(clazz); if (clazz != Integer.class) throw new RuntimeException(); } } It is designed to accept only Type Arguments of Integer . We have added a if-throw check in its constructor. This is a very common way to check the Type Arguments. However, this checking can be bypassed (hacked, fooled) by: OnlyIntegerTypeAllowed<Integer> normalWay = new OnlyIntegerTypeAllowed<Integer>(Integer.class); OnlyIntegerTypeAllowed<String> hacking = new OnlyIntegerTypeAllowed<String>((Class<String>)