flush

How to prevent BrokenPipeError when doing a flush in Python?

戏子无情 提交于 2019-11-30 06:01:06
Question: Is there a way to use flush=True for the print() function without getting the BrokenPipeError ? I have a script pipe.py : for i in range(4000): print(i) I call it like this from a Unix command line: python3 pipe.py | head -n3000 And it returns: 0 1 2 So does this script: import sys for i in range(4000): print(i) sys.stdout.flush() However, when I run this script and pipe it to head -n3000 : for i in range(4000): print(i, flush=True) Then I get this error: print(i, flush=True) BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe Exception BrokenPipeError: BrokenPipeError(32, 'Broken pipe') in <_io

How to flush HttpListener response stream?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-30 04:25:30
HttpListener gives you response stream, but calling flush means nothing (and from sources it's clear, because it's actually doing nothing). Digging inside HTTP API shows that this is a limitation of HttpListener itself. Anyone knows exactly how to flush response stream of HttpListener (may be with reflection or additional P/Invokes)? Update: You can't http stream anything if you don't have a flush option or ability to define buffer size. Flush only works in most of the System.Net namespace when Transfer-Encoding is set to Chuncked, else the whole request is returned and Flush really does

How do I flush output to file after each write with a gfortran Fortran 90 program?

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-11-30 03:13:38
问题 I am running a loop in a Fortran 90 program that outputs numerical values to an output file for each iteration of the loop. The problem is that the output is not saved to the file but every so many steps. How do I get it to flush each step? Example code: open(unit=1,file='output') do i = 1, 1000 write(1,*) i end do close(unit=1) Thanks in advance. 回答1: The other way, if gfortran implements it, is to call the non-standard subroutine flush. Not all compilers do implement this. 回答2: You need to

Is it necessary to call a flush() (JPA interface) in this situation?

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-11-30 02:48:50
问题 Because calling a flush() to get every entities persist from memory to database. So if I use call too much unnecessary flush(), it could take much time therefore not a good choice for the performance. Here is a scenario that I don't know when to call a flush()? //Order and Item have Bidirectional Relationships Order ord = New ord("my first order"); Item item = New Item("tv",10); //...process item and ord object em.persist(ord);//em is an instance of EntityManager em.flush();// No.1 flush()

Empty or “flush” a file descriptor without read()?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-30 01:49:35
问题 (Note: This is not a question of how to flush a write() . This is the other end of it, so to speak.) Is it possible to empty a file descriptor that has data to be read in it without having to read() it? You might not be interested in the data, and reading it all would therefore waste space and cycles you might have better uses for. If it is not possible in POSIX, do any operating systems have any non-portable ways to do this? UPDATE: Please note that I'm talking about file descriptors , not

PHP Error: ob_flush() [ref.outcontrol]: failed to flush buffer. No buffer to flush

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-11-30 01:43:41
问题 Could someone please save these 2 files and run them and tell me why I get the error " ob_flush() [ref.outcontrol]: failed to flush buffer. No buffer to flush". I tried googling around and it says that I have to use ob_start(); but when I do then it doesn't print out line by line, but rather returns the whole object from the FOR loop when it has completed. I'm kinda new to PHP so I'm not sure where else to look.. test_process.php // This script will write numbers from 1 to 100 into file //

SQL Server Log File Confusion

假如想象 提交于 2019-11-29 22:40:19
问题 I'm looking for some clarity on the SQL Server log file. I have a largish database (2GB) which lately wasn't backed up for whatever reason. The log file for the database grew to around 11GB which from my understanding is all the transactions and statements that occurred in the database. My questions: What causes the database log file to be flushed? What does "flush" actually mean? What are the consequences of doing a file shrink or database shrink on a large log file? 回答1: Once you backup the

How do I use the unofficial Android Market API?

三世轮回 提交于 2019-11-29 18:28:55
问题 I'm trying the sample code from here. But my app is crashing. I added logging and found out that it's crashing at session.flush(); so I removed that line and it doesn't crash anymore. But it doesn't reach the onResult callback. package com.mytest.app; import com.gc.android.market.api.MarketSession; import com.gc.android.market.api.MarketSession.Callback; import com.gc.android.market.api.model.Market.AppsRequest; import com.gc.android.market.api.model.Market.AppsResponse; import com.gc.android

Why fprintf doesn't write directly into the file unless fflush() is used?

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-11-29 18:14:27
I have written a daemon that writes a value in a file. What I have observed is that when I keep writing on a file, there is nothing visible in the file. in other hand, If I use fflush() method then the characters are visible in the file. Why fflush() makes a difference? Because it's buffered . That means all writes are stored in a buffer in memory until the buffer is flushed. For printf and friends it's when it has either a newline, or you explicitly call fflush , or of course if the buffer becomes full. By default, stdio is fully buffered, unless it's writing to a terminal, in which case it's

The consequences and pros/cons of flushing the stream in c++

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-11-29 16:09:22
问题 I have recently read an article which stated that using \n is preferable to using std::endl because endl also flushes the stream. But when I looked for a bit more information on the topic I found a site which stated: If you are in a situation where you have to avoid buffering, you can use std::endl instead of ‘\n’ Now here comes my question: In which situation is it preferable not to write to the buffer? Because I only saw advantages of that technique. Isn't it also safer to write to the