finalizer

Static Finalizer

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-11-28 04:39:34
What is the right way to perform some static finallization? There is no static destructor. The AppDomain.DomainUnload event is not raised in the default domain. The AppDomain.ProcessExit event shares the total time of the three seconds (default settings) between all event handlers, so it's not really usable. Basically, you can't. Design your way around it to the fullest extent possible. Don't forget that a program can always terminate abruptly anyway - someone pulling out the power being the obvious example. So anything you do has to be "best effort" - in which case I'd certainly hope that

Should Java 9 Cleaner be preferred to finalization?

感情迁移 提交于 2019-11-27 21:42:12
问题 In Java, overriding the finalize method gets a bad rap, although I don't understand why. Classes like FileInputStream use it to ensure close gets called, in both Java 8 and Java 10. Nevertheless, Java 9 introduced java.lang.ref.Cleaner which uses the PhantomReference mechanism instead of GC finalization. At first, I thought it was just a way add finalization to third-party classes. However, the example given in its javadoc shows a use-case that can easily be rewritten with a finalizer. Should

GC.Collect() and Finalize

不想你离开。 提交于 2019-11-27 19:36:25
Ok, it's known that GC implicitly calls Finalize methods on objects when it identifies that object as garbage. But what happens if I do a GC.Collect() ? Are the finalizers still executed? A stupid question maybe, but someone asked me this and I answered a "Yes" and then I thought: " Was that fully correct? " Ok, it's known that GC implicitly calls Finalize methods on objects when it identifies that object as garbage. No no no. That is not known because in order to be knowledge a statement must be true . That statement is false . The garbage collector does not run finalizers as it traces ,

Why should we call SuppressFinalize when we don't have a destructor

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-11-27 19:22:31
I have few Question for which I am not able to get a proper answer . 1) Why should we call SuppressFinalize in the Dispose function when we don't have a destructor . 2) Dispose and finalize are used for freeing resources before the object is garbage collected. Whether it is managed or unmanaged resource we need to free it , then why we need a condition inside the dispose function , saying pass 'true' when we call this overridden function from IDisposable:Dispose and pass false when called from a finalize. See the below code I copied from net. class Test : IDisposable { private bool isDisposed

GC.Collect() not collecting immediately?

你。 提交于 2019-11-27 16:15:16
In the course of a discussion in chat, I wrote this console application. Code: using System; class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { CreateClass(); Console.Write("Collecting... "); GC.Collect(); Console.WriteLine("Done"); } static void CreateClass() { SomeClass c = new SomeClass(); } } class SomeClass { ~SomeClass() { throw new Exception(); } } Result: Collecting... Done Unhandled Exception: System.Exception: Exception of type 'System.Exception' was thrown. at SomeClass.Finalize() I would have expected the app to crash before Done was printed. I don't care much about how to make it.

Will SqlConnection get disposed by GC?

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-11-27 14:50:27
问题 Disclaimer: I know IDisposable should be implemented when dealing with unmanaged resources. The rest of the code should be deterministic and do using (...) { } (equivalent of try {} finally { Dispose(); } ) to guarantee a cleanup as soon as possible. Also, the GC will not call Dispose(), so the recommended pattern is to override the Finalize() method (in C# using the destructor syntax) which then calls Dispose() . The GC will usually call Finalize() (unless GC.SuppressFinalize() has been

Finalizer and IDisposable

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-11-27 14:47:51
Based on the documentation (MSDN: link ), it is clear that one should use the IDisposable pattern when implementing a finalizer. But do you need to implement a finalizer if you implement IDisposable (so as to provide a deterministic way of disposing the object), and you dont have any unmanaged resources to clean up? As I see it, if the class has only managed resources and if you dont call Dispose, the managed resources will automatically get cleaned up by the GC and hence no need to implement the finalizer. Am I wrong? Also, what if I am using my Dispose method to clean up event handlers. As

How is an object marked as finalized in Java (so that the finalize method wouldn't be called the second time)?

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-27 13:32:42
问题 The main question is in the topic but let me show my vision of finalization proccess in Java so that I can ask you a little more. Well the gc starts garbage collection by marking all live objects. When all reachable objects are marked as "live". All other objects are unreachable. The next step is to check every unreachable object and determine whether it can be sweeped right now or it should be finalized at first. The gc thinks the next way if the object's finalize method has a body then this

Why do finalizers have a “severe performance penalty”?

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-27 13:32:35
Effective Java says : There is a severe performance penalty for using finalizers. Why is it slower to destroy an object using the finalizers? Because of the way the garbage collector works. For performance, most Java GCs use a copying collector, where short-lived objects are allocated into an "eden" block of memory, and when the it's time for that generation of objects to be collected, the GC just needs to copy the objects that are still "alive" to a more permanent storage space, and then it can wipe (free) the entire "eden" memory block at once. This is efficient because most Java code will

Can a simple difference in Python3 variable names alter the way code runs? [duplicate]

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-11-27 13:24:02
问题 This question already has an answer here: Python attributeError on __del__ 1 answer This code... class Person: num_of_people = 0 def __init__(self, name): self.name = name Person.num_of_people += 1 def __del__(self): Person.num_of_people -= 1 def __str__(self): return 'Hello, my name is ' + self.name cb = Person('Corey') kb = Person('Katie') v = Person('Val') Produces the following error... Exception AttributeError: "'NoneType' object has no attribute 'num_of_people'" in <bound method Person.