equivalent

I've a question (just like me)... but...if I've a choosen algorithm written in C or C++ or whatever code you want...fixed a compiler I can determine the number of instructions but these intructions are different each other: x ADD, y MUL, z MOV, f FADD, t FMUL (F stands for FLOATING)...Is there a methodology or equation or something else that permits to write the number of instructions in number of "Equivalent instruction" to compare different algorith? Is there somebody of you that use this type of metric? is it a rubbish? Thanks Marco Part2: I Know that it dipends on uP and architecture in

I'm making an application in C#, based on Delphi (converting code), but I found a command that I do not recognize (shl), and i want to know if there is any equivalent to C#. Thanks in advance. Shl is left shift . Use << C# operator for the same effect. Example: uint value = 15; // 00001111 uint doubled = value << 1; // Result = 00011110 = 30 uint shiftFour = value << 4; // Result = 11110000 = 240 From Shl Keyword this is a bitwise shift left which from C# Bitwise Shift Operators would be << Shl is the shift left operator, in C# you use << . var a : Word; begin a := $2F; // $2F = 47 decimal a :

Is there a Java equivalent of Python's "construct" library? I want to write "structs" like so: message = Struct("message", UBInt8("protocol"), UBInt16("length"), MetaField("data", lambda ctx: ctx["length"]) ) It doesn't have to specifically be a library with some sort of abstraction using the Java language. I mean, it could be a "portable" format, with an API for parsing the documents. I guess this could work out with XML, but it would be be a lot more ugly. I realize I could just inter-operate with Python, but I don't want to do that. I've looked a lot around and all I could find was Ragel

I would like to know if there is an equivalent of the excellent Java JVisualVM (included with JDK, the command is "jvisualvm") on the DotNet platform ? JVisualVM is a great tool that allows developers and admins to have really useful monitoring on any running Java application, here is some features that it has : Graphical view of the threads status Memory/CPU graphs Live heap dump CPU/Memory profiling Garbage Collector / JIT utilization graphs JMX calls Is there any equivalent on DotNet ? Thank you ! I don't know exactly what JVisualVM does, but it seems you are looking for this http://www.red

In Visual Basic, you can use a module as a place to store 'loose' code which can be methods and variables that are accessible from elsewhere in the application without having to first initialize something, and the variable states can be set or changed and will continue to keep that value throughout. The closest I have found, is static methods in C# as part of a public class, however this has the drawback of variables which are not globally accessible, or internally settable/gettable if the variables are made static. Take for example the following simple code in VB stored in a blank module.

The String.Format in .NET (maybe just VB.NET) convert {0}, {1}, ... into determined String, for example: Dim St As String = "Test: {0}, {1}" Console.WriteLine(String.Format(St, "Text1", "Text2")) I've tried to search in both Google and StackOverflows, but they all return number-string format. The other suggestions are certainly good, but are more in the style of printf and its lineage which are more recent additions to Java. The code you posted looks to be inspired by MessageFormat . String format = "Test: {0}, {1}" System.out.println(MessageFormat.format(format, "Text1", "Text2")) I'm not

the question is simple, there is a functional equivalent of the famous iif in java? For example: IIf (vData = "S", True, False) Thanks in advance. vData.equals("S") ? true : false or in this particular case obviously one could just write vData.equals("S") Yeah, the ternary op ? : vData.equals("S") ? true : false The main difference between the Java ternary operator and IIf is that IIf evaluates both the returned value and the unreturned value, while the ternary operator short-circuits and evaluates only the value returned. If there are side-effects to the evaluation, the two are not equivalent

Greetings Overflowers, I know in C we can define a struct inline with the variable declaration so that the struct type is specific to this variable. This is instead of defining the type alone then declaring the variable to be of that struct type. Is this possible in C#? Thank ! This is not possible in C#, however you can define an instance of an anonymous type like this: var x = new { SomeField = 1, SomeOtherField = "Two" }; This would effectively be the same, giving you an instance of a type that is specific to that variable and cannot used outside the variable's scope. Simple answer: No, it