encapsulation

Doctrine2 ORM does not save changes to a DateTime field

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2019-11-27 04:23:55
I have a User entity: use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; /** * ExampleBundle\Entity\User * * @ORM\Entity() */ class User { // ... /** * @ORM\Column(type="service_expires_at", type="date", nullable=true) */ private $service_expires_at; public function getServiceExpiresAt() { return $this->service_expires_at; } public function setServiceExpiresAt(\DateTime $service_expires_at) { $this->service_expires_at = $service_expires_at; } } When i update the User's service_expires_at as following, the updated service_expires_at value is NOT saved back into the database: $date = $user->getServiceExpiresAt();

Java encapsulation [duplicate]

旧时模样 提交于 2019-11-27 04:13:39
问题 This question already has an answer here: Why use getters and setters/accessors? 38 answers We always say that data will be encapsulated if we simply define variables private and define getters setters to access those variables. My question is if we can access the variables (data) though via getters and setters, how come data is hidden or safe? I googled a lot for an explanation, but I found nothing. Every one just said in their blogs and posts that it is a data hiding technique, but it has

Using a strategy pattern and a command pattern

梦想与她 提交于 2019-11-27 04:02:19
问题 Both design patterns encapsulate an algorithm and decouple implementation details from their calling classes. The only difference I can discern is that the Strategy pattern takes in parameters for execution, while the Command pattern doesn't. It seems to me that the command pattern requires all information for execution to be available when it is created, and it is able to delay its calling (perhaps as part of a script). What determinations guide whether to use one pattern or the other? 回答1:

How to hide public methods from intellisense

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-11-27 03:55:03
I want to hide public methods from the intellisense member list. I have created an attribute that when applied to a method will cause the method to be called when its object is constructed. I've done this to better support partial classes. The problem is that in some environments (such as Silverlight), reflection cannot access private members even those of child classes. This is a problem since all of the work is done in a base class. I have to make these methods public, but I want them to be hidden from intellisense, similar to how the Obsolete attribute works. Frankly, because I am anal

Java Encapsulation Concept not clear

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-11-27 03:50:51
This is basic question but still i don't understand encapsulation concept . I did't understand how can we change the properties of class from other class.because whenever we try to set the public instance value of class we have to create object of that class and then set the value.and every object refer to different memory.so even if we change the instance value this will not impact to any other object. Even I try to change using static public instance value also i am not able to change the class property value. Example is given below // Employee class public class Employee { public static int

IEnumerable vs IReadonlyCollection vs ReadonlyCollection for exposing a list member

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-11-27 03:22:49
I have spent quite a few hours pondering the subject of exposing list members. In a similar question to mine, John Skeet gave an excellent answer. Please feel free to have a look. ReadOnlyCollection or IEnumerable for exposing member collections? I am usually quite paranoid to exposing lists, especially if you are developing an API. I have always used IEnumerable for exposing lists, as it is quite safe, and it gives that much flexibility. Let me use an example here public class Activity { private readonly IList<WorkItem> workItems = new List<WorkItem>(); public string Name { get; set; } public

Can I write validation logic in setter methods?

寵の児 提交于 2019-11-27 03:17:13
问题 Are setter methods only used to set the value of attributes as it is passed as argument? Can we write some validation logic before assigning the value to the attributes? 回答1: Yes, validation logic is definitely acceptable. It should be noted though that if you have extensive validation you might want to extract this to a specific validator service. But for simple validations you can safely do this. The entire idea behind using getters & setters is so nobody will have direct access to your

What good are public variables then?

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-11-27 03:02:22
问题 I'm a total newbie with tons of ?'s in my mind and a lot to experience with C++ yet! There's been something which I find really confusing and it's the use of public variables, I've seen tons of code like this: class Foo { private: int m_somePrivateVar; public: void setThatPrivateVar (int const & new_val) { m_somePrivateVar = new_val; } int getThatPrivateVar (void) const { return m_somePrivateVar; } }; Why would anyone hide that variable and implement accessors and mutators when there's

Android - how to add @hide annotation in my project

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-27 02:56:10
问题 I'm developing SDK, and I would like to use @hide annotation for methods/classes which I don't want to be visible for the user who uses my SDK. (same as in Activity implementation - line 3898) I tried just to add @hide annotation but I saw that nothing happens. What should I need to do in order to use @hide annotation/or any other similar solution for encapsulating my internal SDK's classes/methods. 回答1: In Android SDK, the @hide annotation is only used when building the stub version of

What is Encapsulation exactly? [duplicate]

混江龙づ霸主 提交于 2019-11-27 02:45:28
问题 This question already has answers here : Difference between abstraction and encapsulation? (39 answers) Closed 4 years ago . I have got two definitions of encapsulation which could not fit into one definition. Encapsulation is data hiding. With the use of private , protected and public , pack the data into single component. Whatever changes encapsulate it. Protecting anything which is prone to change. How these two definitions are talking about the same concept? 回答1: Encapsulation is probably