documentation

I have a C project which contains two functions with the same name, but each is within a different group/module ( @defgroup ). These functions each compile into a different binary, but I need the documentation to be closely cross-referenced, so I need to refer ( @ref ) to these functions (among other places) from each other's module. When I do simple @ref name-of-the-function , it always links to the one which resides in file which is earlier in the file tree. How can I link to the other one? sleske As far as I can see: doxygen's autolinking does not support having multiple functions with the

After Node.js v0.12 release the official documentation now does not allow us to browse node v0.10 docs anymore. Is there online node.js documentation for v0.10 (not the latest one)? Thank you Jonathan Possible duplicate of Where can I find the doc for a specific API version? ? Here you go: http://nodejs.org/docs/ Or more specifically, for 0.10.0: http://nodejs.org/docs/v0.10.0/api/ 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28446064/node-js-0-10-online-documentation

I'm struggling to figure out how to place the documentation for specific members of my Python class in specific sections of my Sphinx documentation, ideally while auto-documenting the rest in another section. I have a Python class class MyClass(object): def funky(self, arg): """Some docs.""" ... defined in my/module.py which works as expected and I can document without issues using *************************** MyModule - :mod:`my.module` *************************** .. automodule:: my.module .. autoclass:: MyClass :members: :undoc-members: :show-inheritance: But when I try to get more control

I'm writing a library which contains private structs and methods: /// Constructs a new `Object` /// /// Internal API /// /// # Example /// ```rust /// use lib::object::Object; /// /// let tn = Object::new(); /// ``` When I run cargo test , the doctest fails because Object is a private struct. Is it possible to make it compile and run ? I don't think it is possible if you want the test to compile and run, see this related question . I you only want to include the code as a sample in the documentation, without trying to compile and run it, you can exclude it from the tests by adding the ignore