diff3

VimDiff E93: More than one match for RE

由 本秂侑毒 提交于 2020-08-06 08:11:17
问题 So I am new to using vimdiff, however I feel like there is some error. Whenever I try to choose the changes from the remote repository with the command: :diffg RE I get the error: E93: More than one match for RE Not sure where this is coming from or how to solve it. I was pretty surprised that stack overflow doesn't seem to have this problem posted anywhere. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help :) 回答1: There's probably one of the file paths that match the string "RE". Try :diffget REMOTE

Annotated diff file with “<<<<<<< mine” and “>>>>>>> yours” type markers

由 ╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2019-12-10 14:38:26
问题 I am trying to create a diff file using the Linux diff command that has markers like this (taken from diff3 man page): <<<<<<< mine lines from mine ======= lines from yours >>>>>>> yours This format is very intuitive for me and allows me to easily fix merge conflicts in vim and it works great when I am trying to merge three files (mine, yours and original) using diff3 but I would like the same format from plain diff. I was hoping this would be simple but I have not been able to get it. I have

Doing a three-way compare with Git and KDiff3

由 你。 提交于 2019-12-09 02:51:29
问题 Is it possible to set Git up so that I can use the three-way compare in KDiff3? I have two branches that are far too different to auto-merge them, I simply have to check each merge point and I think the best way would be to check out the branch I want the changes from the other branch and say git difftool HEAD_OF_OTHER_BRANCH -- . And then select Merge File in KDiff3. After having gone through the files I'd just commit. I have set up merge.conflictstyle and diff.conflictstyle to diff3 but

GNU diff3 (three-way merge) gives unexpected result

由 情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-12-01 10:55:05
Assume that files MINE and YOURS are descendants of OLD. FILE_MINE= abc def ghi FILE_OLD= abc jkl ghi FILE_YOURS= abc def ghi Command diff3 -m MIND OLD YOURS gives: abc <<<<<<< OLD jkl ======= def >>>>>>> YOURS ghi diff3 cannot resolve that MINE and YOURS made identical changes. Why? And, is there a way to resolve this issue? Tickle your brain with this: diff OLD MIND and diff OLD YOURS have identical hunks in their output. 2c2 < jkl --- > def Should these hunks not "cancel-out" during the three-way merge? What did you expect to have? As the article describing diff3 utility says: ... This

GNU diff3 (three-way merge) gives unexpected result

由 丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-01 07:32:33
问题 Assume that files MINE and YOURS are descendants of OLD. FILE_MINE= abc def ghi FILE_OLD= abc jkl ghi FILE_YOURS= abc def ghi Command diff3 -m MIND OLD YOURS gives: abc <<<<<<< OLD jkl ======= def >>>>>>> YOURS ghi diff3 cannot resolve that MINE and YOURS made identical changes. Why? And, is there a way to resolve this issue? Tickle your brain with this: diff OLD MIND and diff OLD YOURS have identical hunks in their output. 2c2 < jkl --- > def Should these hunks not "cancel-out" during the

Doing a three-way compare with Git and KDiff3

由 拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-12-01 03:01:37
Is it possible to set Git up so that I can use the three-way compare in KDiff3? I have two branches that are far too different to auto-merge them, I simply have to check each merge point and I think the best way would be to check out the branch I want the changes from the other branch and say git difftool HEAD_OF_OTHER_BRANCH -- . And then select Merge File in KDiff3. After having gone through the files I'd just commit. I have set up merge.conflictstyle and diff.conflictstyle to diff3 but KDiff3 still starts with a two-way diff. Is this possible? I guess if Git also sends the common ancestor's

Should diff3 be default conflictstyle on git?

由 我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-28 19:14:00
Recently I enabled diff3 and it's much easier to resolve conflict now. Previously in some cases I had to check the log to see why people did this and that to do the merge. But with diff3 the information is displayed all in one place <<<<<<< HEAD THIS IS USEFUL ||||||| merged common ancestors This is useful ======= This is really useful >>>>>>> c2392943..... From that we can easily see that the result should be "THIS IS REALLY USEFUL" I wonder if there is any downside to diff3? Why it is not the default behavior of git? For other readers (and from this article ): git has an option to display

Git - diff3 Conflict Style - Temporary merge branch

由 六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-11-28 09:43:33
I am doing a merge with merge.conflictStyle set to diff3 . Normally, this inserts three (3) sections separated by four (4) sets of characters. The Git Documentation for Merge clearly explains what these symbols mean for a simple case (as described below). Regular diff3: Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed. <<<<<<< yours:sample.txt Conflict resolution is hard; let's go shopping. ||||||| Conflict resolution is hard. ======= Git makes conflict resolution easy. >>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt And here is another line that

Should diff3 be default conflictstyle on git?

由 拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-11-27 12:51:08
问题 Recently I enabled diff3 and it's much easier to resolve conflict now. Previously in some cases I had to check the log to see why people did this and that to do the merge. But with diff3 the information is displayed all in one place <<<<<<< HEAD THIS IS USEFUL ||||||| merged common ancestors This is useful ======= This is really useful >>>>>>> c2392943..... From that we can easily see that the result should be "THIS IS REALLY USEFUL" I wonder if there is any downside to diff3? Why it is not

Git - diff3 Conflict Style - Temporary merge branch

由 半腔热情 提交于 2019-11-27 03:09:34
问题 I am doing a merge with merge.conflictStyle set to diff3 . Normally, this inserts three (3) sections separated by four (4) sets of characters. The Git Documentation for Merge clearly explains what these symbols mean for a simple case (as described below). Regular diff3: Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed. <<<<<<< yours:sample.txt Conflict resolution is hard; let's go shopping. ||||||| Conflict resolution is hard
订阅 diff3