diamond-operator

Why doesn't the diamond operator work within a addAll() call in Java 7?

人走茶凉 提交于 2019-12-01 14:26:12
问题 Given this example from the generics tutorial. List<String> list = new ArrayList<>(); list.add("A"); // The following statement should fail since addAll expects // Collection<? extends String> list.addAll(new ArrayList<>()); Why does the last line not compile, when it seems it should compile. The first line uses a very similar construct and compiles without a problem. Please explain elaborately. 回答1: First of all: unless you're using Java 7 all of this will not work, because the diamond <>

Java 7 diamond operator: why was it difficult to implement?

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-12-01 13:53:57
问题 I watched the Oracle OTN Virtual Event: Java SE and JavaFX 2.0 (28 Feb 2012) and while talking about the new diamond operator (that Map<String, List<String>> myMap = new HashMap<>(); thing) the speaker mentioned that it was not as simpleto implement than one might think, as it is not a simple token replacement. My question is why? Why can't be this implemented as simply taking the string from the variable's declaration and put it into the diamond operator? 回答1: I didn't implement it either,

Why Diamond operator was not missed from Right hand side in Java 7?

点点圈 提交于 2019-12-01 09:33:12
问题 Java 7 has improved the diamond operator In Java 6 Map<String, String> myMap = new HashMap<String, String>(); In Java 7 Map<String, String> myMap = new HashMap<>(); In Java 7 Types have been removed from diamond operator on Right hand side(RHS). My question why don't remove complete diamond operate from RHS. I know it will throw the warning, But java 7 could have removed the warning also. - Type safety: The expression of type HashMap needs unchecked conversion to conform to Map<String,String>

Wildcards with diamond operator

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-12-01 02:05:02
问题 If I am trying to do something like this : List<?> unknownList = new ArrayList<>(); then the code compiles and runs fine, but of which type the ArrayList has created? and after this line, If I have done like this : unknownList.add("str"); //compilation error It gives compilation error : error: no suitable method found for add(String) unList.add("str"); ^ method List.add(int,CAP#1) is not applicable (actual and formal argument lists differ in length) method List.add(CAP#1) is not applicable

Why Diamond operator was not missed from Right hand side in Java 7?

别来无恙 提交于 2019-11-30 23:31:56
Java 7 has improved the diamond operator In Java 6 Map<String, String> myMap = new HashMap<String, String>(); In Java 7 Map<String, String> myMap = new HashMap<>(); In Java 7 Types have been removed from diamond operator on Right hand side(RHS). My question why don't remove complete diamond operate from RHS. I know it will throw the warning, But java 7 could have removed the warning also. - Type safety: The expression of type HashMap needs unchecked conversion to conform to Map<String,String> - HashMap is a raw type. References to generic type HashMap<K,V> should be parameterized Logic behind

Why explicit type argument should be replaced by diamond? [duplicate]

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2019-11-30 01:26:43
This question already has an answer here: What is the point of the diamond operator (<>) in Java 7? 7 answers I'm using Android Studio and I write this : List<Button> buttons = new ArrayList<Button>(); I have this message : Explicit type argument Button should be replaced by <> I'm curious, why would it be better to use diamond instead ? List<Button> buttons = new ArrayList<>(); EDIT : I don't agree with the duplicate at all ! I saw that answer before and it compares explicit argument to no argument at all, whereas I compare explicit argument to implicit argument ! It is less verbose, consider

Maven project Error: Diamond/multicatch operator not supported in -source 1.5 [duplicate]

风格不统一 提交于 2019-11-29 18:27:14
问题 This question already has an answer here: Maven Compilation Error: (use -source 7 or higher to enable diamond operator) 4 answers I can't build my maven java web application, because of the following two errors: diamond operator is not supported in -source 1.5 (use -source 7 or higher to enable diamond operator) multi-catch statement is not supported in -source 1.5 (use -source 7 or higher to enable multi-catch statement) I'm confused, because i use java 1.8.0 for my project, i never have

Which file is Perl's diamond operator (null file handle) currently reading from?

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-11-29 17:34:51
问题 I'm using Perl's diamond <> operator to read from files specified on the command line. I'd like to be able to report messages like "Trouble on line $. of file $FILENAME" , but how can I tell which file is currently used by the diamond? 回答1: See perlvar: $ARGV Contains the name of the current file when reading from <> . But also consider $. in perlvar. If you do this with perl -n it might not turn out the way you want it, because the counter is not reset in the perl -n use case. $. Current

Why can't I use the diamond operator with an array in Perl?

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-28 13:23:18
Code $ cat test1 hello i am lazer nananana $ cat 1.pl use strict; use warnings; my @fh; open $fh[0], '<', 'test1', or die $!; my @res1 = <$fh[0]>; # Way1: why does this not work as expected? print @res1."\n"; my $fh2 = $fh[0]; my @res2 = <$fh2>; # Way2: this works! print @res2."\n"; Run $ perl 1.pl 1 5 $ I am not sure why Way1 does not work as expected while Way2 does. Aren't those two methods the same? What is happening here? Because of the dual nature of the <> operator (i.e. is it glob or readline ?), the rules are that to behave as readline, you can only have a bareword or a simple scalar

Why does the diamond operator not work for java.util.Collections methods in Java 7?

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-11-28 07:16:14
问题 In Java 1.7.0_55, if I write this field declaration, I get a compilation error ("incompatible types"): private final Map<String,Object> myMap = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<>()); If I change that to read: private final Map<String,Object> myMap = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<String,Object>()); It compiles fine. (I'm using synchronizedMap as an example here, but the same is true for other Collections methods, unmodifiable*, synchronized*, etc) But why does the diamond