contract

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58150954/how-to-force-client-code-to-initialize-all-required-builder-fields-in-kotlin-wit

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58150954/how-to-force-client-code-to-initialize-all-required-builder-fields-in-kotlin-wit

问题 I have written sample Pact test for MessageProvider by referring to sample example given in pact repo. Following is the consumer test which is generating the PACT json file for the message expected from Provider. In case of API, to verify the PACT, I was able to do this using "pact-jvm-provider-maven" plugin. In this case the PACT is verified against the actual hosted API service of Provider. My Question is, how in case of MessageQueue, PACT will be verified? Will a mock Queue gets created?

问题 Question: how can I split swagger definition across files? What are the possibilities in that area? The question details are described below: example of what I want - in RAML I do have experience in RAML and what I do is, for example: /settings: description: | This resource defines application & components configuration get: is: [ includingCustomHeaders ] description: | Fetch entire configuration responses: 200: body: example: !include samples/settings.json schema: !include schemas/settings

问题 I am mapping an idea for a relationship using Core Data. I have an Employer entity who has a many-to-many relationship with Employees . Basically, an employee can work for multiple employers, and an employer can have multiple employees. The problem I'm facing is, I'm not sure how to manage the contracts between employees and employers. As an employee can work for either 1 or many employers, they would naturally have a contract for each employer they work for (complete with salary, duration)

问题 My question is, if an interface that is implemented implicitly by extending a class that already implements it, should be explicitly implemented by the class, if the class wants to advertise the fact, that it fulfills the contract of that interface. For instance, if you want to write a class, that fulfills the contract of the interface java.util.List . You implement this, extending the class java.util.AbstractList , that already implements the interface List . Do you explicitly declare, that

问题 struct buyer{ uint amount; Status status; } mapping(address=>buyer) public buyers; mapping(uint=>address) buyerIndex; uint public buyerNum; //Order a product. function(){ uint doubleValue=value*2; uint amount=msg.value/doubleValue; if(buyers[msg.sender]==null){ //Error in this line buyer abuyer=buyer({amount:amount,status:Status.Created}); //Error in this line buyerNum++; buyerIndex[buyerNum]=msg.sender; buyers[msg.sender]=abuyer; }else{ buyers[msg.sender].amount+=amount; } Order(msg.sender

问题 I am getting an error message saying: The contract attribute is invalid. the value is invalid according to its datatype 'clientcontracttype' Following is the endpoint configuration in web.config of this WCF application. I am using .NET Framework 4.5 and Visual Studio 2012. I have verified the contract OnlineReporting.Core.Contracts.IReportingInternalWcfPortal is already there. <endpoint address="http://localhost:63817/ReportingInternalWcfPortal.svc" binding="basicHttpBinding"

问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 7 years ago . Possible Duplicate: why does my compare method throw exception — Comparison method violates its general contract! I've this code: class TimeComparatorTipo0 implements Comparator { @Override public int compare(Object a, Object b) { String Time1 = ((DataImportedTipo0) a).ora; Long VolTot1 = Long.parseLong(((DataImportedTipo0) a).volume_totale); String Time2 = ((DataImportedTipo0) b).ora; Long VolTot2 = Long.parseLong((

问题 I'm working on writing some constraints for a class method using PyContract (not PyContracts). As a postcondition, I'd like to ensure that the memory address of the instance hasn't changed i.e. id(self) should be the same before and after calling the function. How can I do this with PyContract? I have the following (minimal) code: class Individual: def append(self, chrom): """ post: __old__.self is self len(__old__.self.chromosomes)+1 == len(self.chromosomes) self.chromosomes[-1] == chrom """