complexity-theory

What is the computational complexity of `itertools.combinations` in python?

倖福魔咒の 提交于 2019-12-01 08:03:31
itertools.combinations in python is a powerful tool for finding all combination of r terms, however, I want to know about its computational complexity . Let's say I want to know the complexity in terms of n and r , and certainly it will give me all the r terms combination from a list of n terms. According to the Official document, this is the rough implementation. def combinations(iterable, r): # combinations('ABCD', 2) --> AB AC AD BC BD CD # combinations(range(4), 3) --> 012 013 023 123 pool = tuple(iterable) n = len(pool) if r > n: return indices = list(range(r)) yield tuple(pool[i] for i

What is the computational complexity of `itertools.combinations` in python?

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-01 07:41:09
问题 itertools.combinations in python is a powerful tool for finding all combination of r terms, however, I want to know about its computational complexity . Let's say I want to know the complexity in terms of n and r , and certainly it will give me all the r terms combination from a list of n terms. According to the Official document, this is the rough implementation. def combinations(iterable, r): # combinations('ABCD', 2) --> AB AC AD BC BD CD # combinations(range(4), 3) --> 012 013 023 123

Multiple Array Merge Using Binary Heap

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-01 06:37:45
Given k sorted arrays of integers, each containing an unknown positive number of elements (not necessarily the same number of elements in each array), where the total number of elements in all k arrays is n, give an algorithm for merging the k arrays into a single sorted array, containing all n elements. The algorithm's worst-case time complexity should be O(n∙log k). Name the k-sorted lists 1, ..., k. Let A be the name of the combined sorted array. For each list, i, pop v off of i and push (i, v) into a min-heap. Now the heap will contain pairs of value and list id for the smallest entries in

Complexity for recursive functions - Time and Space

荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-12-01 05:34:05
问题 I was interested in knowing how to calculate the time and space complexity of recursive functions like permutation, fibonacci(described here) In general we can have recursion at many places than just at permutaion or recursion, so I am looking for approach generally followed to calculate tmie ans space complexity Thank you 回答1: Take a look at http://www.cs.duke.edu/~ola/ap/recurrence.html 回答2: Time complexity and space complexity are the two things that characterize the performance of an

Multiple Array Merge Using Binary Heap

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-12-01 04:58:26
问题 Given k sorted arrays of integers, each containing an unknown positive number of elements (not necessarily the same number of elements in each array), where the total number of elements in all k arrays is n, give an algorithm for merging the k arrays into a single sorted array, containing all n elements. The algorithm's worst-case time complexity should be O(n∙log k). 回答1: Name the k-sorted lists 1, ..., k. Let A be the name of the combined sorted array. For each list, i, pop v off of i and

Complexity of the recursion: T(n) = T(n-1) + T(n-2) + C

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-12-01 04:32:58
I want to understand how to arrive at the complexity of the below recurrence relation. T(n) = T(n-1) + T(n-2) + C Given T(1) = C and T(2) = 2C; Generally for equations like T(n) = 2T(n/2) + C (Given T(1) = C), I use the following method. T(n) = 2T(n/2) + C => T(n) = 4T(n/4) + 3C => T(n) = 8T(n/8) + 7C => ... => T(n) = 2^k T (n/2^k) + (2^k - 1) c Now when n/2^k = 1 => K = log (n) (to the base 2) T(n) = n T(1) + (n-1)C = (2n -1) C = O(n) But, I'm not able to come up with similar approach for the problem I have in question. Please correct me if my approach is incorrect. The complexity is related

python: complexity of os.path.exists with a ext4 filesystem?

て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2019-12-01 04:25:27
问题 Does anyone know what the complexity of the os.path.exists function is in python with a ext4 filesystem? 回答1: Underlying directory structure used by Ext4 (and Ext3 ) is exactly the same as in Ext2 . Ext3 adds journaling, Ext4 improves that journaling. Journaling is irrelevant to your question. Originally Ext2 used to store that as list, but that of course was inefficient for large directories. So it's has been changed to tweaked version of B-tree called HTree. Unlike standard B-tree, HTree

Tools for measuring empirical computational complexity of Java codes?

血红的双手。 提交于 2019-12-01 04:17:03
问题 I have a few Java codes for which I wish to measure empirical computational complexity . There is a trend-prof tool which takes as input compiled C/C++ programs . Are there similar tools to the trend-prof that take as an input compiled Java programs ? 回答1: Sonar is commonly used : http://www.sonarsource.org/ Regards. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10007327/tools-for-measuring-empirical-computational-complexity-of-java-codes

Finding 'bottleneck edges' in a graph

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-12-01 04:15:46
Given a random unidirected graph, I must find 'bottleneck edges' to get from one vertex to another. What I call 'bottleneck edges' (there must be a better name for that!) -- suppose I have the following unidirected graph: A / | \ B--C--D | | E--F--G \ | / H To get from A to H independently of the chosen path edges BE and DG must always be traversed, therefore making a 'bottleneck'. Is there a polynomial time algorithm for this? edit: yes, the name is 'minimum cut' for what I meant witch 'bottleneck edges'. Sounds like you need minimum cut, the minimal set of edges removing which will separate

Is time complexity for insertion/deletion in a doubly linked list of order O(n)?

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-01 02:59:56
问题 To insert/delete a node with a particular value in DLL (doubly linked list) entire list need to be traversed to find the location hence these operations should be O(n). If that's the case then how come STL list (most likely implemented using DLL) is able to provide these operations in constant time? Thanks everyone for making it clear to me. 回答1: Insertion and deletion at a known position is O(1). However, finding that position is O(n), unless it is the head or tail of the list. When we talk